134 points

These protests need to start happening outside of these reps’ offices.

permalink
report
reply
123 points

Reps need to be taking part in the protests. Preferably Korean-style.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

You mean the US representatives that won’t set term limits? The US representatives that won’t vote to outlaw insider trading? The US representatives who own businesses that benefit from their legislation? Those people? Just gotta be clear here. Because I’m feeling a little uncertain about their loyalties at the moment. At least towards their voters… To their donors, I’m rock solid on where they owe their fealty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Term limits(for congress) aren’t an issue. It’s outright good to have a portion of reps with institutional knowledge on how to run a government, and extremely helpful in diplomacy with other countries as well.

Age limits are the real issue to push, because geriatric fucks being in charge is the real danger.

Everything else, I wholly and completely agree with you on

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

AOC ain’t that sorry

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

God that photo goes hard on so many levels

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There were multiple US House Representatives as the protest in DC on Saturday. Several spoke on the stage and others were out in the crowd.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

*houses

They just don’t go to their offices or close them or ban protests.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I saw someone call for protesting on golf courses, might be even better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And federal buildings in democratic areas… unfortunately status quo democrats aren’t going to be the champions of this - they will just use it to fund raise more

permalink
report
parent
reply
-122 points

It’d be nice if all of these protesters had bothered to vote and not with protest votes.

permalink
report
reply
78 points

I think these people are the ones to have voted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

In the US system it doesn’t matter how you vote except in like 7 states.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Well, that wouldn’t be true if everyone voted, but it does bring up the point that winner take all is just a bad representative system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

There is no such thing as a good “representative” system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

What makes you think they didn’t?

75 million people voted for Harris. We likely won’t know the count of today’s protests, but I feel safe saying it was far fewer than 75 million.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The estimate was 5 million people across 1300 cities.

A lot of people complaining about these protests seem to think that level of coordinated protesting isn’t impressive.

Those numbers alone should make anyone stop and think about what’s going on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It’s going to get bigger as people’s 401Ks evaporate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

More astroturfing

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

“proper action wasn’t taken in the past therfore I won’t accept any action being taken in the future.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Oh look, another liberal blaming eveybody and anybody except the traish-tier Democrat platform/candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hey if they had 4 more years they sure would have at least thought about punishing the insurrections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

It would be nice if there had been non-fascist duopoly candidates to vote for. But here we are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Let’s not forget that there are more than two choices. I understand there is certainly a duopoly, but that only continues as long as we continue voting for only one or the other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-141 points

it’s everywhere

And they are doing what that is useful? The amount of people in any of these pictures could easily enter the White House and unseat Trump, yet here we they are, performativelizing.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

I do agree that the resistance needs to become more radical, but you don’t just enter the seat of power and unseat the democratically elected president. Like it or not he still has a popular mandate and that needs to be destroyed first; that’s ultimately what civic resistance is all about. Also he has armed security, which can just shoot any intruders in part because of said popular mandate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Like it or not he still has a popular mandate and that needs to be destroyed first;

Okay, then how? Because from what I have seen pretty much every official in a position of civil service just resigns to let Trump do as he pleases, so there’s not much of a resistance. Who in civil service is supposed to unseat Trump? DOGE is certainly not gonna do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Who in civil service is supposed to unseat Trump?

Absolutely nobody. Trump’s mandate has to be destroyed by widespread popular resistance. Think what Ukraine and Tunisia did and Turkey is doing right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

What popular mandate? The guy won the same amount of votes as last time. Stop with this mandate shit, it’s bullcrap.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

It’s performative.

It’s the same reason sports games have hype crews in the form of bands or a cheer squad. It livens the audience up.

In politics it also sends a message to their reps that they could/should be a little bit more aggressive in promoting what their people are saying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Attack the head of the snake and chances are you’ll get bit. He’ll be in a chopper before a window gets broken and the National Guard will be there in minutes.

The GOP are getting cold feet, Musk is close to leaving, and Trump is starting to throw his appointees under the bus. Sorry you probably won’t get to see Trump tied up and crowd surfed into a van to never be seen again but this is the process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

“Gaddafi!” Sorry, it just popped into my head when I read "crowd surfed ".

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points

Sorry you probably won’t get to see Trump tied up and crowd surfed into a van to never be seen again but this is the process.

Sure, whatever process that works works. My point is I’m not seeing a process - I’m no seeing progress. Just complaining, which is something the elites can already and have always burrowed their heads in the sand at.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The process is broken because the people in charge of the processes hadn’t had a reminder that the American people wants them to perform their job. This is that reminder. In order for the reminder to be more effective, we need more people to join in, not more people trying to douse cold water on the movement just to promote more drastic actions that lacks the foundation to do anything effective. You want people to be able to drag fascists out of the White House if the situation calls for it? Then, you need more people that is able to fight against fascism. Easiest method to do that is to protest together and show more people that there is enough people fighting against it for them to come out fighting as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Classic astroturfing right here. “let’s bitch about people getting involved but not yet murdering people!” cut this shit out. And get involved!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

Also classic astroturfing is complaining about astroturfing. Fact is you never know who posts a comment. But mostly, I agree with your sentiment here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I refuse to get that meta 🤣

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Doesn’t look like that. I skimmed the profile very briefly, and it looks like a bad take on an otherwise active and normal account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

And they are doing what that is useful?

Protesting, making their voices heard. Showing the world that not all Americans are fascists.

The amount of people in any of these pictures could easily enter the White House and unseat Trump

You clearly don’t have any idea how overzealous the security in and around the white house is.

Even IF they somehow got to the oval office after suffering hundreds if not thousands of casualties, the Mango Mussolini would have long since been whisked into a bunker and secret service and the military would arrest or kill all of them.

yet here we they are, performativelizing

The first person part was correct, the plural wasn’t. What’s performative is your insistence that the obviously impossible is easy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Honestly though. I thought it would take hundreds of casualties to get into the capital building. And really, is trump actually in the white house much? Golf ain’t going to play itself. But these protests build up the confidence of people who want to do more. It makes them feel like the people are behind them. So maybe these are warm ups for taking the white house.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If there is a warmup, I think the Mar-a-Lago would be a good place to make things toasty. It makes it clear what waits for Trump if he continues to use the Oval Office as a toilet bowl.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I thought it would take hundreds of casualties to get into the capital building

It would have if they hadn’t been almost exclusively white members of the MAGA cult. One reason why there were so few cops hindering them was that Trump ordered a standdown, and another was the fact that there were more cops participating in the coup attempt than resisting it.

If it had been a diverse leftist group, you better believe there’d be both cops and military shooting to kill rather than the suspiciously restrained tactics employed that day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Would it even get that far? Gathering that many people in one spot, at the same time, with a coherent plan would take… a lot of communication. And we know for a fact that the spooks are listening in.

But, hell, @veniasilente@lemm.ee, start organizing people. I’m interested in seeing how far it gets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

You want the people to “Maga hat” riot the white house? You think that’s the plan?

Were you dropped on your head as a baby?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Good to see more young people.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

I’m so happy to see this, finally some good news from the us.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 316K

    Comments