8 points

How much a bump did Trump get after getting his ear pierced?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

He has to be losing his shit right now. The attention from a near miss isn’t doing a damn thing compared to this lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I’m so grateful Democratic leaders actually responded to organic pressures. It was close and almost cast off as “elitism,” but by golly they did it. I and many others made the case for this EXACT scenario — that Biden stepping down and endorsing Harris would steal all thunder from Trump’s past weeks of victories and attention. So far it’s playing out flawlessly.

Well done to all my fellow advocates who weathered bedwetter accusations or that we were playing Fantasy Football or watched too much West Wing lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s a bit early, but it looks as if it didn’t have much of a positive effect on his approval.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/favorability/donald-trump/

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

It happened last week, so no numbers have been required to be released yet.

I expect it wasent that much, or else they would be touting it themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I guess Biden wasn’t exaggerating when he complained about elites wanting him out.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Elites and almost everyone else wanted him out. Polls had 80% of democrats wanting him out.

Biden had an “emperor has no clothes” moment on live TV for 90 minutes. Everyone saw it. Everyone saw a man that didn’t have what it would take to beat Trump again.

Cut this “it’s what the elites wanted” shit. It just doesn’t comport with reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I was being sarcastic while also pointing out the truth in his statement. I’ve been accused of supporting Trump for calling for a better candidate quite a lot. I’m satisfied with Harris so long as she does a good job on the campaign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Platform Main article: Political positions of Kamala Harris Domestic issues Abortion Harris supports national protections for abortion, which were reversed after Roe v. Wade (1973) was overturned by Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022). Under the Biden administration, she prominently campaigned for abortion rights.[20]

Climate change Harris is an advocate for environmental justice to address the impact of climate change on lower-income areas and people of color. Under Biden, she supported his climate legislation.[20]

Immigration As vice president, Harris invested US$950 million into Central American companies to address the causes of mass migration, such as poverty. She supported a proposed bill which would close the border if too crowded and fund border patrol agents. She believes the immigration system is “broken” and needs to be fixed, and she says most Americans believe this.[20]

Foreign policy NATO and Ukraine Harris is expected and has signaled to generally follow Biden’s foreign policy on NATO and Ukraine, supporting both in the aftermath of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.[20][21]

Israel–Hamas war Harris is noted to have tougher positions on Israel than Biden. She supported Israel’s offensive against Hamas in the aftermath of its attack on Israel, but criticized it throughout the war because of the Gaza humanitarian crisis. She also has been noted to be more allied to progressive Democrats who oppose Israel.[20][21][22] Under the Biden administration, she called for a ceasefire and pushed for more humanitarian aid.[23] Reports have said she is more sympathetic to Palestinians than Biden, though it is disputed whether she would immediately change policy.[24][25]

China Like Biden’s administration officials, Harris has advocated for “de-risking” from Beijing, a policy that encourages reducing the economic dependence on China.[26] She also raises the issues of Hong Kong, Xinjiang, Tibet, Taiwan, etc., just like any other Democrat government, with the intention of curbing China’s rising power both economically and militarily.[27] Chinese social media does not look favorably on her candidacy,[28] and is more familiar with other candidates, such as Antony Blinken.[29] Chinese public opinion believes that she will lose to Trump.[29]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris_2024_presidential_campaign

https://www.politico.com/interactives/2024/kamala-harris-joe-biden-platforms/

get she is not Trump but what does she bring to the table fair question

permalink
report
reply
19 points

That’s a persuasive list and I like it. I like it more than Biden’s history at least where Israel & Palestine are concerned.

Dunno what issue you have with it, but if you’re going to reply directly TWICE to the main thread… Then it clearly bothers you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points
*

it does bother me

feel Trump is bad enough not to need comments he does it himself but the democrats act like sitting back and giving lip service is enough

get progress takes time but it has been time a long time ago

and that list is it and she has not even posted anything her website

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

“Trump is bad, but I won’t vote for Harris”.

Ok smoothbrain.

“She hasn’t even posted on her website”.
Lmao that’s you’re qualifying action for candidates?

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

LOL, what a world. Just let that sink in that donnie being a convicted felon meant more donations. The right sure do have their kink.

permalink
report
reply
100 points

After years of disappointment and abject apathy… what is this feeling I’m feeling? Hopeful?

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Do you remember the feeling of hope frodo?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Po-ta-toe

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a styew!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The temerity to believe?

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Some Black guy in a tan suit had a word for it in the past.

Hope? I think it was Hope. But I can’t be sure, it’s been so long.

Perhaps this is a “New Hope”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The Audacity of Hope.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

But he was wearing a tan suit and that’s just sacrilegious.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 189K

    Comments