You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
40 points

As much as I hate it, I think there too much subconscious misogyny to try it. It’s a recipe for failure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

And racism. Can’t forget the racism!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Well as a European, I’m going to give the US some credit: voters did elect a black, ‘possibly-Muslim’ guy with a name that sounds vaguely like a well-known terrorist. And they elected him twice.

Besides, the democrats really appear to be in a situation where they’ll vote for a proverbial ham sandwich if it stops Trump from getting the presidency.

Are there racist voters who hate women? Obviously. But it’s not like it’s an immediate disqualification.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Make it a real ham sandwich instead of a proverbial one, and you’ve got a deal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The ham sandwich has my vote since its not Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I think that would work for her. There’s way more minorities and centrists that would come out to vote for her because of Obama’s legacy than racists that would stay home out of spite IMO. I certainly don’t think she’ll be anything like Obama, but one could hope.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Though racism is a factor, that doesn’t mean she isn’t also a bad candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Aren’t all of the misogynists already voting for Trump? I think just being a younger woman candidate could energize the younger voting base.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Especially with bodily autonomy being a live issue

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah it will energize, and they’ll be really confused on voting day when they find out they needed to register to vote.

I think voting should be mandatory, easier, and have an abstain option for those people who don’t want to choose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I’m afraid a lot of older Dems just wouldn’t vote, it’s a low turnout that could be killer.

I don’t know if she really resonated with the younger voters that much, not like AOC for instance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

All the right wingers who wanted Trump are going to vote for him and all the Republicans that wanted someone else rallied behind a woman during their primaries. I think people are blowing up an issue thats less impactful than they make it out to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m sure there’s plenty of misogyny and racism to put people off, but don’t underestimate “being another bland candidate who won’t get people excited enough to vote”.

It wasn’t just women haters that made Trump beat Clinton.

People’s lives are shit, and while Trump will for sure make them even shittier, “things will be mostly the same as they are now, with some baby steps towards things you’ve wanted for decades” isn’t exactly a rallying cry for the ages.

The Democrats were never going to let Sanders have anything, but AOC? Maybe? She at least makes the news when she says things. And unlike Republicans, they’re not horrible things.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 8.9K

    Posts

  • 162K

    Comments