You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
45 points

I am begging automakers to stop putting classic sports car names on gigantic electric SUVs. Use literally any other names.

permalink
report
reply
22 points
*

The “mustang mach E” - while by all accounts a great car - is just an absolutely catastrophic branding decision imo.

A Mustang is a sports car. A Mustang is not an SUV.

Honestly, it’s just so dumb. They could have picked another horse-oriented name if they really wanted to, but this is like calling an electrified Blazer a “Camaro” (to GM: please… don’t…)

Edit:

Good horse names instead of “mustang mach e”:

  • Clydesdale (honestly, this seems like a slam dunk. The car is heavy, but very powerful, and will likely be used by families as a “workhorse” car)
  • Andalusian
  • Appaloosa
  • Percheron
  • Shire
  • Ardennais

And this way, instead of the inevitable profusion of suffixes that special and sporty editions will create, you can clearly differentiate between the “sports car” line and the “electric sporty SUV” line. And do not try to fucking tell me “it’s an electric sports car!” It is not. You are lying to me and you are lying to yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Or just stick the electric transaxle in an actual Mustang.

Btw, any car guys here should know you can just buy the mustang transaxle as a “crate motor” from Ford and drop it in what you want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Right?

I want to emphasize: my issue is NOT that it’s electric.

My issue is that Mustang != SUV.

Also SUVs are fucking stupid, but I digress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I have one and I just call it a Mach e.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

What’s really stupid is that like you said, it’s actually a great car. It could have stood on its own! Instead, it got a bunch of backlash hate. I wouldn’t even look at it for a long time because of the name. After I finally did, I was pretty impressed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Absolutely agree. It’s actually a great vehicle, and the various trim levels actually seem very sensible. But the fact that it’s a “mustang” just kills it for me as a car enthusiast. I’d never be able to own one and look at it without thinking “fuck I am such a poseur for buying an electric mustang SUV 🤦‍♂️”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Ford had been annoying people with this stuff for like 40 years. The 90’s and 00’s were full of cars brands that were slapped on random things that didn’t look or feel anything like their predecessor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think this is mainly a ford thing, isn’t it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Ford is the worst offender (and more specifically the one who does electric SUVs) but the Mitsubishi Eclipse and Dodge Hornet are gas/hybrid SUVs that reused nameplates from sportier coupes on an SUV. I suspect the Honda Prologue might’ve been the Prelude at some point but that’s just a guess. At least that one didn’t get a reused name.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Honda is releasing a new Prelude soon too, so probably was Prologue all along

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

They’re still have the same issue but it is not just the EV SUVs. They did the same with their ICE Mustang & Challenger. Although the latter felt marginally better than the former. Almost all cars nowadays have the same issue of looking like chubby babies with fat rolls.

permalink
report
parent
reply

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

!evs@lemmy.world

Create post

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

Community stats

  • 2.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 806

    Posts

  • 4.1K

    Comments