You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
115 points

This will probably be taken down, but psychology is what I do so here it is. This is not endorsement this is an explanation as to why there’s different sentiment for this shooting.

This was stated in Trevor Noah’s latest podcast in open discussion. Josh Johnson raises the point. Most gun violence stories on the news, people personally feel threatened. Outraged that they or theirs could be at a music festival, a movie, at school. Most assholes with a gun are killing innocent people, never mind all the other bits. And most are clearly a little “crazy.”

This was targeted, killer on killer, no collateral (death/injury) damage. The CEO had kids that’s the collateral damage. There’s even a lady with coffee who walks on scene then nopes out unharmed.

This isn’t endorsement. This WHY the public as a whole doesn’t seem to mind. The guy who died killed thousands. That solves the innocent part. The killer doesn’t feel threatening to any of us. Because he’s not. That solves the threat. As for sanity, gun arguments aside, the manifesto isn’t unhinged.

And so we find ourselves in an unusual space. Understandably so. This is new.

No I didn’t read the article.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

The CEO had kids that’s the collateral damage.

Given his falling out with his ex-wife and penchant for alcoholism, they’re arguably better off without him, assuming he wasn’t already a deadbeat dad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sure. Can you explain why this guy gets charged with terrorism, but school shooters and Jan 6ers don’t?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Perception management, probably. I thought terrorism applied to upsetting state entities not private ones. How, by any stretch of the imagination, is a private health insurance company part of the United States government? It’s bizarre. Jan 6 would fall under that umbrella for sure.

What do you think?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My thoughts is they’re making an example of him because he went after the true ruling class - CEOs. And the Jan 6 ers went after “the help” so the cops don’t care. Just like when the children of the masses are gunned down in schools. Get a school shooter at the private academy the president’s kids all attend and suddenly the ruling class will care.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

As for sanity, gun arguments aside, the manifesto isn’t unhinged.

Just curious, what do you mean by “gun arguments aside”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’m a gun owner. There is a subset of people who think that alone makes you unhinged as a human being.

Luigi is just crazy enough to do what he did (allegedly). Probably not even a gun owner beyond an engineer guy makes this tool/thing on his printer and then learns how to become proficient using that tool/thing. I don’t think Luigi was LARPing training exercises with an AK, with friends, in the northern MI woods. I think he probably approached it the same way the rest of us would approach learning Linux for our next PC build.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I see, thanks for the clarification! I thought you were referring to the actual manifesto, and I was going to point out that the supposed real one didn’t mention guns at all, but if I recall correctly the fake one did. So never mind me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-98 points
*

The killer is not threatening to you until semeone decides that you deserve to be killed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

I would say that if you find this particular killer’s motives personally threatening, you should probably resign from your day job and move into your bunker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Have you killed thousands of people through insurance denials to make a quick buck? No?

Then you’re fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Yes, exactly. I don’t think there is anyone in the world who knows me and believes that I, specifically, deserve to be killed. I think almost every person feels the same way. The rare exception being someone who has intentionally profoundly harmed or killed people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

semeone decides

I would simply not deny Luigi his health care. And I’d sleep easy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Someone else may decide to kill you for a different reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Someone, maybe, a fair point. It will probably happen at work if at all given the boring, “helper” life I lead.

But not this guy. That’s the salient point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

That’s the point. “WHY” did they decide it had to be you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I haven’t killed tens of thousands of sick people so I’m safe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Someone might decide that something else you did is wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

You mean someone like Brian Thompson?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You mean Brian Robert Thompson?

It’s a long standing tradition to refer to serial killers by their full name. Think John Wayne Gacy. It seems appropriate here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You watch yourself on that slippery slope now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Found the CEO!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I see you getting downvoted but a lot of doctors get death threats too, and while everyone seems to have a horror story about a doctor they didn’t like, I’m pretty sure most are the scapegoats of a broken system. So yeah, while Luigi’s target was well-chosen, I don’t trust every vigilante to be as smart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

a lot of doctors get death threats too

I gotta wonder at the folks who have bombed (or threatened to bomb) abortion clinics and been lionized by pro-Life advocates. Even granted clemency by ultra-right wing Republican governors.

None of them seem particularly enthusiastic about this slaying, though.

So yeah, while Luigi’s target was well-chosen, I don’t trust every vigilante to be as smart.

The starkest comparison I’ve seen is Daniel Perry - who strangled a man to death on the subway - getting box seats with the President/VP and a full throated cheer from folks on the right.

Meanwhile, Luigi has enormous mainstream appeal, but enjoys virtually no positive coverage among liberals on the left.

The division is stark. It’s very obvious that vigilantism is encouraged by the state when it targets certain people. CEOs just aren’t on the approved list.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If the person you’re replying to was a health insurance CEO I would be extremely supportive of that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Uplifting News

!upliftingnews@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today’s news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity’s capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else’s big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

Community stats

  • 3.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 336

    Posts

  • 3.4K

    Comments