🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
196 points

To be brief, it’s propaganda designed to keep rural voters red. Ie- “those big city folk don’t care about you.”

permalink
report
reply
80 points

Partly…

But also that the Dem party today is significantly more “conservative” economically than we used to be, as the article points out:

In 1910, Teddy Roosevelt thundered his warning that “a small class of enormously wealthy and economically powerful men, whose chief object is to hold and increase their power” could destroy US democracy. Roosevelt’s answer was to tax wealth. The estate tax was eventually enacted in 1916, and the capital gains tax in 1922.

In the 1912 presidential campaign, Woodrow Wilson promised “a crusade against powers that have governed us … that have limited our development … that have determined our lives … that have set us in a straitjacket to do as they please”. The struggle to break up the giant trusts would be, in Wilson’s words, a “second struggle for emancipation”.

Wilson signed into law the Clayton Antitrust Act, which strengthened antitrust laws and protected unions. He also established the Federal Trade Commission to root out “unfair acts and practices in commerce”, and created the first permanent national income tax.

Years later, Teddy Roosevelt’s fifth-cousin, Franklin D Roosevelt, attacked corporate and financial power by giving workers the right to unionize, the 40-hour workweek, unemployment insurance, and social security. FDR instituted a high marginal income tax on the wealthy – those making more than $5m a year were taxed up to 75% – and he regulated finance.

Plus, Teddy was the first presidential platform that used universal healthcare…

So part of it is that Republicans lie and propaganda

But if the modern Dem party didn’t think the Dem party platform from a fucking century ago wasnt “too extreme” the modern Dem party would be as popular as it was with FDR.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

I think that’s more of a symptom than a root cause. republicans’ goal since the 70’s has been to pull the lower and middle classes to them with wedge identity issues like abortion. the whole “elitism” thing is a part of that too. So now the parties are competing on those wedge issues and identity more than economic progress, as they were in FDR’s time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Like, you understand that if the Dem party wanted to, they could still be that economically progressive, right?

And that in doing so it mitigate Republicans lying?

The Dem party becoming more economically conservative is solely the fault of the people choosing to do what donors want over what Dem voters want…

Both parties focusing on the “wedge issues” is by design, that way the wealthy who donate to both parties always win…

The only people who control the Dem.platform is Dem party leadership, them choosing wealthy donors over voters is literally no one’s fault except the people running the party who keep repeatedly making that choice.

I get wanting to blame Republicans, but we can’t on this one.

It’s literally as easy as Kamala deciding to do so at this point, it’s a month from election and she’s the candidate. But she’s not, instead she keeps moving to the right economically the closer we get to the election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I also wish the Dems would promote more progressive policies. At the same time, the media does not celebrate the wins for Dems, such as the creation of the CFPB that Elizabeth Warren established. They don’t celebrate the response to oligopoly through review of mergers and acquisitions by the FTC under Lina Kahn. They don’t celebrate the reduced child poverty rate under the expanded child tax credit. Positive progress doesn’t make it to mass media even when it does happen, which isn’t often enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

By the same token, they report everything trump says…

The report everything Vance says, but also Biden and Kamala too.

If Biden and Kamala talked about those things, then the media would too.

Kamala just went on an interview blitz, I watched some of it, didn’t see her being up anything you mentioned. Did she in any of the recent interviews you e seen?

She was just on Colbert, he’d have let her say anything she wanted to…

Do you remember what she choose to discuss?

Edit:

Walz just talked about ending the Electoral college, and the media reported on it.

But they also reported on Kamala distancing herself from it.

That’s an example from like today of what I’m talking about. All it takes for the media to report on something is a high ranking politician saying it. There’s so many and so desperate for ad revenue they will cover anything that comes out of someone’s mouth if they’re on the presidential ticket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Stop blaming the Dem leadership and look at the facts.

The voters heard Donald Trump say that he liked grabbing the pussy and that he didn’t like soldiers who got captured.

People are choosing garbage because they’d happily eat a ton of manure if it meant they could blow stink in a Libs face.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Death had to take him sleeping. For if Roosevelt had been awake, there would have been a fight.

Damn I miss Teddy. One of the last presidents to truly give a fuck and put the actions behind it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

He really wasn’t one of the last tho…

Not by a longshot, hell, Ike was the last good Republican and he was long after Teddy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidents_of_the_United_States

Things were going pretty fucking great till the original “October surprise”

According to the allegation, on top of the Carter administration’s agreement to unfreeze Iranian assets in U.S. banks in exchange for the release of the embassy hostages, the Reagan administration’s practice of covertly supplying Iran with weapons via Israel likely originated as a further quid pro quo for having delayed the release until after Reagan’s inauguration, setting a precedent for covert U.S.-Iran arms deals that would feature heavily in the subsequent Iran–Contra affair.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1980_October_Surprise_theory

Which is why I’m so fucking nervous hearing right wingers start using that phrase lately.

They might not know where it comes from, but somewhere the person coming up with their talking points does. They just don’t spontaneously come up with shit, they parrot the phrases they’ve heard.

But anyways, on the timeline of our country things have only been getting worse since we stopped running progressives and started Bill Clinton and the neoliberals.

We had a brief respite with Obama, but when you compare Obama and Carter and remember there was 27 years between them…

Obama wasn’t anywhere near as progressive as we should have been.

“Moderate” democrats is not a successful strategy, we have all this freaking data and history to support it, but we just fucking ignore and keep letting the wealthy run shit cuz it’s easy.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Plus, Teddy was the first presidential platform that used universal healthcare…
So part of it is that Republicans lie and propaganda

Ironic considering that Teddy was a Republican.

But also that the Dem party today is significantly more “conservative” economically than we used to be

But that’s the contradiction. The GOP is even further along this scale, so how can the GOP be seen as the party of the people while the Dems are elitists?

Partly…

I think mainly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

We need to bring back the Bull Moose Party (at the local level, not the Russian-backed spoiler effect garbage like the Green Party is debasing itself at).

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

A better idea is to do to the Democratic Party what the Tea Party and MAGA did to the Republicans.

Primary out corporate candidates and push for progressive ones at every level. President, congressional rep, school board trustee, dog-catcher: it doesn’t matter.

The problem progressive voters have is that they don’t show up, and the especially don’t show up during off years, in primaries and in down-ballot races. The polticial right, by comparison, has been getting people in place on small races for years.

Sanders did more for progressivism by enthusing Democratic members to vote in primaries and down-ballot races than Stein or any third party has ever done, and we’re seeing results. It needs to continue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I can see the reasoning that the presidency is the biggest office and gets people talking about third parties the most…

But the reason the Green Party is obviously a grift is they focus on battleground states for those presidential runs.

If they were doing what they said they’re trying to do, they’d focus on states like Cali where they can get the media attention and votes while not handing the presidency to Republicans.

Like everything in American politics, it all depends on what state something is happening in

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

You wouldn’t bring up the shortcomings of First Past The Post voting and then do nothing to change the voting system… would you?

So glad to hear of your public promise to work towards pass electoral reform in your state. Wishing you and your people the best of luck in this campaign you just signed up for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Propaganda makes you believe that one of the two party is your fiend. Meanwhile for the past century both the red and blue party has served elites interests and fuck over everyone else (including the planet). The proof is that you are a peasants and it would take you a couple of minutes just to visualize how much a billion is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

The system is working as intended. A country created by the wealthy, for the wealthy, and controlled by the wealthy.

Having said that the two sides of the same coin is a bunch of bullshit when you see 60+ years of hate and fear propaganda conducted by conservatives.

Making every modern amenity a partisan issue and is also no mistake. It is very clear one side is keeping us from free education, free/cheap healthcare, equality, and a living wage. It is even clearer when they are pushing for more child labor, pollution, racism, and sexism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You are contradicting yourself.

The system is working as intended. A country created by the wealthy, for the wealthy, and controlled by the wealthy.

It’s not hard to understand, in such a system you don’t make it to the top unless you belong to the wealthy

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

To be fair, there is a kernel of truth there.

https://www.cracked.com/blog/6-reasons-trumps-rise-that-no-one-talks-about

The rural folk with the Trump signs in their yards say their way of life is dying, and you smirk and say what they really mean is that blacks and gays are finally getting equal rights and they hate it. But I’m telling you, they say their way of life is dying because their way of life is dying. It’s not their imagination. No movie about the future portrays it as being full of traditional families, hunters, and coal mines. Well, except for Hunger Games, and that was depicted as an apocalypse.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 189K

    Comments