You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
121 points

permalink
report
reply
-37 points
*

This is misleading because being higher up you can see much better further ahead, and over obstacles and barriers. Your special awareness is much better at distances that are relevant for avoiding collisions. If something is 1.5m away its too late anyway.

The angle is also incorrect because they are putting the eyes of the driver straight in line with the hood, which is not how its been in any vehicle I’ve ever driven, the head should be higher or further forward.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

The origin of the line is at head height…

Also these vehicles gain in distant visibility at the expense of everyone else on the road, blocking their views.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

The best way to avoid getting into an accident is to see it long before you get there. But situational awareness is not something the vast majority of drivers actually practice or have…

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Also, an astounding proportion of fatal pedestrian collisions happen at low-speed, close to home where these sightlines explicitly matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

You don’t want to see “over” obstacles close to your vehicle when said obstacles are in fact human beings standing in front of your car.

At parking lot speeds, 1.5 meters is also not “too late,” and it certainly isn’t when you are at a standstill but need to determine if it is safe to move or if there is a small person in front of your vehicle, i.e. in the school pickup line, or in a parking lot, or your own driveway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Ooo ooo we can do it like buses do. We’ll put a bar on the front that folds out. 3 year olds totally know what that is right? They’ll just get out of the way!

(/s)

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I will gladly trade my SUV in for a gently used M1

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Only 20 gallons to the mile, not bad

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Absolutely nobody will cut you off in traffic, though. At least nobody who wants to see the next sunrise…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

what if the M1 doesn’t have a touch screen though

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

good
touchscreens should be banned from vehicles

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Touch targeting

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It actually does, but it’s a hundred times more useful. It helps make things go boom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

This is actually a good point. And here’s a video discussing the issue.

https://youtu.be/YpuX-5E7xoU?si=cmwWAFTUyAFt40mL

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

The whole chart is rather fascinating and eye opening: Vehicle visibility

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’d be curious to see that chart for a Toyota Yaris. I drove one for a few years and it was almost unnerving how little hood it had.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Same here. Going from a 1990 VW Passat to a 2009 Yaris was wild.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Astounding. Hummer H2 beating the Sierra by 3m is incredible. A truck designed almost exclusively to express how selfish you are and it has better viability.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This chart is eye-opening…I always thought Hummers were made by…Hummer…

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

Thanks, embedding:

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

An articulated quarry hauler is barely worse than a pick-up truck

‘murca

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

That’s not to mention the optics.

https://www.quora.com/Where-does-the-M1-Abrams-have-the-optics-of-its-main-cannon-I-dont-know-anything-about-tanks

#4 is the optic for the RWS. This cannot be used to aim the main gun, but it can be used as an alternate form of CITV, especially since it’s so damned high off the ground, it may be able to see over obstacles. Not as good as CITV in the thermal range, though.

That being said, some civilian vehicles are gonna have their own camera systems too, so…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Civilian vehicles should all have thermals and a night driving HUD. If I’m paying 30,000 dollars then they can damn well put some actual stuff in there. Headlights being weaponized isn’t something we have to tolerate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sorry, no can do, also cupholders are extra, best we can do is plastic hubcaps and a 10,000/6 month warranty.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 197K

    Comments