Bypass paywall: https://archive.ph/Kz2Sp

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
47 points

Sorry, no. Fuck SpaceX. They are helping destroy everything.

https://www.independent.co.uk/space/elon-musk-spacex-starlink-internet-b2567423.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Well, this was actually fkning concerning. Ofk is not like other Company aren’t playing to launch thousand of satellites too. There should be a serious regulation and some heavy changes in the metal alloy used at very least. I’m sure that Trump already has a plan about it…

… ofk i’m fking kidding. Vote [everyone else] x president .

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

So we’re starting to look at aluminum debris in the upper atmosphere, when are we going to look at carbon fibre debris? Or rocket fuel in the upper atmosphere? We dont know what any of that shit does. Im going to hazard a guess that it does nothing good.

If you were to light ten thousand Starlink satellites on fire in a bonfire on the ground people would put you in jail. When it happens in the upper atmosphere its called progress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Completely stopping the launch of new satellites will simply not happen. The only realistic response is to face the problem and improve the technology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Rocket fuel? You mean that stuff that makes water?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Type of metal doesn’t matter, it’s any particle that leftover CFCs from the 1970s can stick to and make it more likely for them to react and destroy ozone. The ozone hole is over Antarctica and changes size seasonally because high altitude ice clouds do the same thing, smoke from forest fires also does it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You can criticise them for that while being glad they are a reliable astronaut transport, unlike Boeing. The world is not black and white.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I am glad of that, but this is what I responded to:

SpaceX is nailing it. I just hope that the future will remember the terrific work that Gwynne Shotwell and many others did while “someone else” where busy tossing money away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Fair enough!

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Aluminum is a major element of the 5200 tons of stardust per year. Sadly found no numbers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Ehhh needs more study. Aluminum oxides in the atmosphere actually provide a cooling effect. That being said, we don’t know much about the health implications yet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

If you read the article the hazard is the Aluminum Oxide could deplete the Ozone layer. So a disruption to a different ecological process rather than the Greenhouse effect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Right on. The “cooling effect” will hopefully offset all the kerosene and methane they’re injecting into the upper atmosphere and oceans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

They’re injecting water vapor and carbon dioxide, as well as soot (not kerosene or methane). I don’t mean to imply that it’s not an issue, but that more study is warranted (the article says the same thing).

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh boy, you’d better not look at the cattle industry then.

Every rocket launch ever done in history doesn’t make even a blip on the graph for human-related carbon emissions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.8K

    Posts

  • 118K

    Comments