erin (she/her)
TTRPG enthusiast and lifelong DM. Very gay đłď¸âđ.
âYes, yes. Aim for the sun. That way if you miss, at least your arrow will fall far away, and the person it kills will likely be someone you donât know.â
- Hoid
On the contrary, since growing my nails out my nails have been way more clean. There is an awkward period between no nails and long nails where stuff gets caught underneath, but once you grow them out (only two weeks or so), theyâre perfectly clean because thereâs just more space underneath and nowhere for gunk to get caught as the angle is wider.
The parent comment doesnât appear to be copaganda, or even have a stance one way or the other. The comment is context, which is important for discussing the issue at hand. Because of the context, we should not be discussing police brutality or excessive use of force in this case, we should be discussing the immorality of a justice system which allows someone to be charged with felony murder in the case of an accomplice.
To clarify, if this group of teens broke into a home and shot the homeowner, that would be a justified charge of felony murder for all the accomplices. However, their friend chose to essentially commit suicide by cops, and the convicted was running away at the time. Again, the parent comment did not make any qualifiers on the actions of the cops or anyone else present, they posted context with which other commenters can frame their discussion. Nowhere in their other comments could I discern a pro-cop stance, reading with an objective eye. Reactionary pointing of fingers just discourages future posters from providing context.
Before you accuse me of copaganda as well, ACAB, systemic racism is a huge problem in the US, and our justice system is rigged against the most vulnerable.
I feel no need to be protected in my day to day life. My partner provides love, companionship, empathy, and a listening ear. Sure, some women might care about protection and toughness or whatever youâre on about, but attraction varies from person to person. Most other women I know want to be heard and loved. People are allowed to want to fuck âfragileâ men. They can be hot without needing to be âmanly.â Youâre putting so much stock in traditional gender norms, not realizing that itâs not women that actually care about those. Itâs the men that are trying to be that. Some women will, of course, but women arenât a monolith. Want an example? Timothy Chalamet is very commonly considered to be an extremely attractive actor, and heâs far more androgynous and âfragile,â as you put it, than your traditional masculine ideal. Just as many women might be attracted to any number of different appearances, because people are different! The days of needing a strong man to support us frail women are over. Your insecurities and ideas of masculinity are clouding your judgment.
To answer your question succinctly: No, they arenât fragile looking, theyâre just slim. No, they donât look âdehumanized,â they look like people. The dehumanization happens in industry, not with their faces. I know people that look similar. Some women find them hot, and want to fuck them, and idolize them, because they are hot! Theyâre very attractive people, if that aesthetic is what youâre into! If your only metric is how likely they are to win a fight, sure, they probably arenât at the top of the scale, but the vast majority of people DONâT CARE.
They told you to look into therapy because you have an unhealthy idea of what women are attracted to and what masculinity should be. They called you insecure because you sound insecure (why do women like the weak little boys and not big manly men :(( they look so frail and weak, donât women know they canât protect them??). Whether or not thatâs how youâre actually thinking, itâs how it comes across. Instead of realizing that some people do like strong men, you took it to a place of jealousy and defensiveness.
TLDR: Different strokes for different folks. Donât obsess over people you donât find attractive still being attractive to others, as it isnât good for your mental health and isnât a good look.
The Barnsley Fern was constructed specifically to resemble the species of fern that it does. There are versions of it that have been modified to resemble other ferns. The fractal isnât some secret mathematical code for why ferns look like they do, itâs more like a drawing of a fern. If someone made a fractal to look like another leaf, it would be just that, not an advancement into the secrets of botany.
The short answer: no. The two do not connect beyond the fact that ferns have a design reminiscent of a fractal, which is likely what inspired the fractalâs creation.
How ârealâ is it? It is a real set of functions, but if I design a set of functions to look like William Dafoe, it doesnât mean Iâve cracked the matrix code into his genetics.
Every vegan
Factually incorrect and anecdotal
the concept of death doesnât even exist in most animal minds
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8602129/
Good read, though anyone thatâs seen a pet mourn their owner or their friend knows thatâs not true already.
canât take you seriously anymore
Itâs a portmanteau of debater and statist. Frankly, I donât care what you think about me. Youâre clearly biased beyond any reason as to the motives of others, to the point of making false blanket statements about entire groups. Any time someone says âall _____ are _____,â there is a problem and they should be questioned. Did the vegans you approach solicit your question? If they did not, then mind your own business. If they did, and âflip their shit,â (X to doubt on the reliability of this narrator) then that one person had an issue. The sheer fact that you can easily find very chill vegans online or irl without much effort means youâre a statistical anomaly, an asshole, or misrepresenting the truth.
The premise of your previous comment was that regardless of the health effects (ie: if vegan cat food is healthy), the cats didnât consent to it. That argument doesnât make any sense. I donât disagree that cats need proper nutrition, again, I feed my cat meat. I just think your argument based on consent is not well founded and there are better ways to argue your point without making a strange implication about ignoring consent. I donât think forcing a cat to be vegan is okay, unless that diet is properly supplemented with all the nutrients the cat needs, which may or may not be possible. I donât know. Again, Iâm not arguing for cats to be fed vegan. Iâm arguing against using consent as the angle against veganism, because that opens up a whole can of worms as to hypocrisy. Iâm not vegan, and there are perfectly good reasons to be or not be vegan, but animal consent definitely isnât an argument to be made against veganism unless you want to confront the issues with animals just as intelligent as cats, or more, being consumed as food.