Wouldn’t you want 5 more chairs, so the parents could sit too?

‘we let’ women have rights? Women fought tooth and nail for years to get those rights, and assholes are still trying to claw them away; fuck, there’s places in the US right now where women are dying because their access to healthcare has been sabotaged by a supreme court that reinterpreted the constitution to remove their rights.

She got 60% of young woman voters, but the enthusiasm was much less. Fewer than 20% of democrats said they were enthusiastic to vote for Hillary.

Who numbered this, Hideaki Anno?

Well we didn’t see that enthusiasm for Hillary so I have no idea what you’re on about.

Also, and I wasn’t expecting I’d have to say this today, women aren’t horses. Additionally, horses are actually pretty egalitarian with their leadership; that’s why they’re such good allies for humans, they don’t mind being led by a person instead of a horse.

Tl;Dr: every part of your comment is wrong.

Also there’s no laws being passed to make it illegal.

Hmm. I see the argument, but it seems to be more like an issue with pricing than a flaw with HSR. Once high speed track is in service it should be able to run plenty of trains all around the clock, I can see how it could make low speed rail seem redundant.

I’d think it would make more sense to keep the low speed tracks and use them for freight, and also make high speed rail cheaper to ride.

At least that’s what the juice jackers want us to think.

Anyone else see the back of the chair as the person’s hair in the first two panels?