Scranulum

Some are affected significantly by it. I would say that in my experience, most aren’t. Most would work a messy suicide with open cranial trauma and then go eat a big plate of spaghetti after turning the scene over to the coroner.

Dead human flesh smells like most raw meat does. Pork isn’t any more similar than beef as far as the aroma is concerned. Rotting human flesh smells pretty similar to most other rotting meats. A lot of times, it smells worse because most people’s experience with rotting meat is a few ounces, maybe a few pounds, that they left in their refrigerator or something of that nature. 200 pounds of it marinating inside a dank bathroom with poor ventilation, exposed subflooring, and a space heater that’s been running for two weeks is gonna smell a lot worse.

But everyone’s different and has their things. I know a guy who can handle everything except when someone vomits. He will spew every time without question. Some people can’t handle feces well. Some people can’t handle mucus plugs from a tracheostomy tube that hasn’t been suctioned in far too long. Some people can’t handle bile mixed with chicken noodle soup that fountains out of a cardiac arrest on the first chest compression. Some people really do perceive burning human flesh as having its own distinct and repulsive smell. A lot of people would say that, actually. To me, it just smelled like burnt meat.

The rotting flesh or dead flesh itself is unfortunately far from the nastiest thing you encounter, usually.

I don’t see

Finally, we agree on something. Cheers.

If you believe that hateful, harmful ideas shouldn’t be challenged and should be allowed to stand on their own as long as the person spewing them is sufficienly annoying, sure, mate. Unfair characterization.

Or maybe you just said even dumber shit in response and they changed their mind. Even the brightest among us may never know. Truly confounding.

You have now retreated to “but they promised they would stop talking,” btw. Just keeping you aware of the scoreboard here, so to speak.

“Oh, I’m spreading rhetoric that hurts people? Why are you even responding to it, then?”

Your entire edit is actually a perfect microcosm of the victim blaming mentality, but (poorly) disguised as a virtue signal about victim blaming. Well done mate. Despicable.

Misandry is when someone says men who believe women shouldn’t be allowed to vote are abusive.

Thank you for that elevated, nuanced take, king.

When you lie under oath as a defense attorney, witness, or defendant versus the state, it is called “perjury.”

When you lie under oath as a prosecutor, solicitor, district attorney, or cop, it’s called “Tuesday.”

Yes

God, it upsets me so much when other people talk about things I already know. UGH. I should make a post about this. My feelings are more relevant than world news.

At this point, it just feels like I’m punching down. So I’m gonna go ahead and stop, because you clearly are not equipped to meet me where I am.

Please continue spamming the same link with the same commentary. They are sure to listen to you if you just scream louder. You aren’t swinging at ghosts at all. :)

“Old” is subjective, and I’d still say they’re old and have been repeated ad nauseum, but you definitely left out the context that would cast doubt on your initial message. This is intellectually dishonest.

I wish you’d quote what I said about the thesaurus and take that into consideration, too. There are other words besides “internally appointed CEO” and “cult.” It’s literally just spam for spam’s sake. We get it dude, you’re mad at the church. Go be mad at it someplace other than a news thread.

You don’t come across as someone who cares about these issues or the people who have been hurt by the church. You come across as someone exploiting death for the sake of argument, which makes you no better than the Catholic church by your own admission.

Now fuck off back to r/atheism and quit spamming lemmy news threads with edgy drivel.