PepeLivesMatter
Zwei Emojis im Titel, ist das legal?
Women asked for this. No, they demanded it. Even if it came at the cost of making it harder for men to find jobs.
If you aren’t upset, why spend all this time and effort trying to make me regret what I said instead of simply proving me wrong?
If what I said was baseless and nonsensical, it would be easier and more effective to just disprove it rather than coming up with more and more insults to my intelligence instead.
Other people have at least managed to point out that they found it inappropriate because the OP wasn’t blaming men for her situation, to which I have agreed. Yet here you are still heaping abuse over my head and trying to convince me you’re not upset.
Sorry, but I’m not buying it.
No, I do understand that nuance, and I appreciate your ability to explain it without resorting to name calling or insults.
You and others are upset not because what I said wasn’t true (it was), but because it’s something you’d rather not talk or even think about. Okay. Point taken. She did indeed not blame men for her situation, at least not directly, I will admit that. Although I’m sure there’s already a feminist somewhere waiting to explain to me how shareholder value is a tool of the patriarchy that was designed for no other purpose than to oppress women.
Eine Steuer, die Geld spart? Was kommt als nächstes, eine Inflation, die die Preise senkt?
Wieso haben die keine Rücklagen für sowas? Vielleicht sollte die Bundesregierung einfach mal weniger Avocadotoast essen als mehr Schulden aufzufahren.
