If you are willing to set it up, yes try it.

AI stuff is banned in this community.

It tastes like dirt.

Both Firefox and Chromium support native Wayland.

Also, this might lead you in the right direction for remote Wayland apps: https://github.com/wayland-transpositor/wprs

You could set up Wayland probably. Just make sure you use GNOME (Mutter) since it is the only Wayland DE that protects the screencopy API.

Docker guest still shares a kernel with host. Use a custom OCI runtimes like kata-containers (VM) or gVisor/sydbox-oci (unprivileged application kernel) to reduce the kernel attack surface and protect against privelege escalation.

Yes

I am not a troll. You don’t need to be an ass.

Just because a system doesnt have a CVE doesn’t make it secure. It needs proper exploit mitigations. Read why Linux isn’t secure here.. The article is written by the lead developer of Whonix OS (Security hardened Debian with a focus on anonymity). If you had checked out any of the references from my previous comments you would have learned more about why I have this opinion.

Kali isn’t any more secure than regular Debian, while also having a larger attack surface, and no kernel hardening, protecting of GUI, or application isolation. What makes it “secure”?

My point exactly. A large attack surface means less secure. My point was that Kali isn’t focused on being a secure OS. It is all about the tools. Even without a vulnerability, a secure OS should protect against unknowns.

Ubuntu font. Idk why but I like it.