81 points

The folks in this thread are misinterpreting the comment. It’s not that someone from 1970 wouldn’t understand the concept; it’s that they would rightfully think that it’s stupid and judge you for putting up with it.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

The 70s might not want to throw shade…

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

This is the food equivalent of a liminal space, I do not like it and I wish to shed blood over it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Did anyone ever actually eat this sort of thing, or was it just the recipe book equivalent of a fashion show? Or perhaps it’s just regional. I sure as hell never ate that in the 70s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Apparently my grandparents did in the 70s and thought themselves very futuristic for it. That being said my grandma is well known as the worst cook in the family and my grandpa was known for mixing all his food together “because it’s all going to the same place anyway”…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It was ‘subtle’ punishment for abusive husbands.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Normally these aspic dishes look vile but I might be able to get down with this one, provided the contents were cooked well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points


That’s twice I’ve posted that this week.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That was just hold over food from the 50s. They were obsessed with gelatin back then, and plenty of them were still traumatizing us at family gatherings through the 80s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What’s holding it together?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Can confirm, have boomer parents who wonder wtf is wrong with everyone just freely giving up all their personal data to the people they spent 15 years being drilled not to give their information to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

On the other hand;

“I don’t care because I have nothing to hide.” - My mother, born 1961, when told she should stop using Chrome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Neither do I. But why give up something I don’t have to? If it’s valuable to someone else, I should at least get some compensation for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Even in the early 00s it was already hard to grasp for some folks. I had friends who called me a liar for claiming that I could charge my mp3 music player by slotting it in the USB port of my tower as opposed to swapping out AAA batteries

permalink
report
reply
25 points

When “Lithium Ion” sounded like something from Star Trek.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

In the early 2000s??? Are you sure they weren’t just messing with you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I’m not sure about the timeline on portable mp3 player development and popularity, but this was 2002 or 2003 and I was the only one in my friend group who had one with a li-ion battery as opposed to AAA-batteries.

“USB doesn’t deliver power, it’s for file transfer!” I was told. Some of my friends were also really stupid, though. That could have contributed to this wonder of technology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Fair enough!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

loll

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Well, I realize that 1970s sounds like an age of dinosaurs to some people… But, people back then weren’t cavemen. They had electricity, batteries, video cameras, telephones.

The concept of an electric outlet in a couch is easy - not sure, but they might even had such things back then. Like to feed a lamp or something. USB is just low voltage and different connector, from the power transmission perspective.

The concept of a speakerphone with video signal is also easy. The only thing to grasp is that the devices and batteries became that miniature and efficient. Oh, and wireless.

Explaining that all video and voice recordings from all these neat devices are actually stored by a gigantic corporation, processed with voice and face recognition algorithms, and used to enrich personal profiles collected on all parties of the conversation to boost profits of said corporations, and many people even pay for this - THAT I would find complicated to explain.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Mobile phones wouldnt be strange by the 70’s. Two way handheld radios and car phones been around since the 40’s and the first cellphone was demonstrated in 1973.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
8 points

:D

FediMirror’d (MirrorIverse’d)

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

XLR connectors and related systems have been around since the 50s. The precursors to USB, like ADB and PS/2, were being released commercially by the mid 80s. I agree that the concept would not have been mind blowing in the 70s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yep, it’s the IoT aspect that would make their heads spin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah that part that’s hard to explain to them is something I think many people don’t understand now. It’s very abstract.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s not that they would be dumbfounded like a caveman, it’s that there would instantly be a lot of weird questions.

Why do you bother to have electricity coming out of your couch? Why is a “doorbell” on battery, those are just buttons wired to a chime? Why did you call it a doorbell if it’s an intercom with camera? What do you mean you answer the doorbell using your phone? Why do you call it a phone when it’s a computer that you barely use to talk on it?

Yes you could explain things and they would catch on, but the sentence would be odd, and not likely a trajectory for terminology and applications of technology they would have naturally expected.

All sorts of times I reflect on how much I’d have to explain odd sentences to even how things were 30 years ago. Like using your phone to turn off the lights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
3 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Because you like toxins that give a strange high?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Toxins?

… strange?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Wait, you have to charge those Spyware doorbells?

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Only if they’re not hardwired in - lots of people where I live just stick them to their doors so there’s no wires.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Tfw the bell is stolen

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There were a bunch of videos posted of people stealing them when they first came out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If it’s hardwired in, it’s not significantly harder to steal than otherwise. Clipping a couple of wires connected to a doorbell transformer is significantly easier than dealing with whatever mechanism is used to release the doorbell from it’s attachment.

Also, you would be stealing a camera that will film it’s own theft and upload the footage on it’s way out.

Additionally, these devices aren’t exactly expensive anymore, not a whole lot of value in stealing them. Even if stolen, not a huge setback to buy another one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There’s a security screw.

permalink
report
parent
reply

People Twitter

!whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Create post

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it’s a major figure or a politician.

Community stats

  • 9.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 33K

    Comments