98 points

Honestly. I don’t give a fuck at this point. Just give me a D who can get to 270. Fuck the republican traitor filth.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

People are begging for that D. Just give them the D!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

What’s 270?

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

The number of electoral votes needed to win the presidency

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Electoral college minimum majority to win the election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The only number that matters. Unfortunately, the number of people that want a President doesn’t matter in our goofy, slave-era Electoral College.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The number of electoral college votes to win. Each state has a number of votes based on the census population data.

270 is half the EC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It’s the amount of people the U.S who want to vote for Kamala Harris.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s sort of the whole deal - we’re all looking for who can get us there the best (at least those of us arguing in good faith)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

They Harris Trump wins she is a fucking horrible choice. Yall forget how many independents are sitting on the fence. Which means a lot of them still can’t choose (which should say a lot) No way she can beat Trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I still can’t fathom how the fuck anyone is an independent anymore. Too lazy to vote, yes. Have no idea who your party’s candidate is? Sure. Don’t know which party to vote for? No way in hell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Looking at voting data, almost no one is really independent. The vast majority of people who register independent almost always vote down party lines for one party, and they just don’t want to label themselves democrat or republican.

permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
61 points
*

In the thumbnail… is she wearing a tan suit?

Oh yes.
This would be awesome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

It was a white suit that she spilled Dijon mustard on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You can already smell the indignation Fox News is cooking up

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Was she doing a latte salute at the time?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Imagine if she ran with aoc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Would be cool, but 1) doubt they would do a ticket with two women, unfortunately. This is already a massive gambit, they will need to do everything they can to keep/get more votes, and imo, that means a man (preferably with name recognition) for VP pick.

And, 2) VP is a toothless, essentially useless position. I think it would be a mistake to take AOC away from her home district for 4 to 8 years just for her to do nothing meaningful. We need her in our legislative branch right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

AOC’s district is dark blue. It won’t effect the votes much. It would raise AOCs profile if she has ambitions for POTUS but that’s so many hypotheticals.

The most immediate impact is that it would motivate the base. Dems need voter turnout to win. 2 women lashing the Republicans over abortion rights is a winner imo on top of AOCs popularity with the base. There are sound reasons for it. Not saying I think it’s a good idea though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Trump is elected: we descend into a fascist hellhole. A woman of color is elected, they probably start a civil war. We are fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

A woman of color is elected, they probably start a civil war. We are fucked.

I’m not scared of Y’all Qaeda. Let them fucking try.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Nah. Those greasy fucks would get obliterated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

You sure about that when a metric shitton of cops and military support Trump?

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

Is it sad that to be a “good” president, all one has to do is beat trump at the polls (ok the electoral college), and then do nothing else?

A great president would beat trump then roll back the immunity ruling (somehow ;) ) codify roe v Wade, and resign.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Why would they resign and present an undue opportunity for the far right to come to power again?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Would make the vice the president, who then could/would pardon the resignee, making anything the resignee did an official act, and if not then the pardon is the official act.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah… you’re right. I’m an exhausted idiot who is too tired to think straight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

What are you on about ?

Why are you dragging the goalposts down the field ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I kinda wanna see someone paint the White House in tie dye. White is so…. Boring.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Why the fuck would or should anyone who could achieve those things resign?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Is it sad that to be a “good” president, all one has to do is beat trump at the polls (ok the electoral college), and then do nothing else?

Democrats barely even have that much ambition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Can these fucking articles actually link to the data? I appreciate including the sampling information but right now I really want to see the actual questions being asked because push-polling absolutely has been used by some of the other outlets.

permalink
report
reply
22 points
*

Okay I found the poll and it’s fucking awful…

https://apnorc.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/July-2024-W1-topline.pdf

For Approve, Disapprove, Undecided, Null they have:

Harris: 30, 49, 20, 1

Newsom: 17, 31, 51, 1

Whitmer: 15, 21, 64, 1

Harris clearly has the best name recognition but 49% disapproval is insanely high. And they didn’t include any other potential candidates like AOC, Warren, or Whitehouse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How the hell is 30% a majority

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Isn’t AOC too young anyway?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Nope, she’ll be old enough for the inauguration and that’s all that matters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

A new poll from the AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that about 6 in 10 Democrats believe Kamala Harris would do a good job in the top slot. About 2 in 10 Democrats don’t believe she would, and another 2 in 10 say they don’t know enough to say.

The undecided can be convinced during the campaign.

But I doubt I’ll start thinking Kamala would be a good president…

I do think that she’ll be able to beat Trump in the election at least. Which is better than Joe.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

What has she done to make you feel she is a psychopath?

psychopath

/sī′kə-păth″/

noun

  1. A person who engages repeatedly in criminal and antisocial behavior without remorse or empathy for those victimized.
  2. A person with a personality disorder indicated by a pattern of lying, cunning, manipulating, glibness, exploiting, heedlessness, arrogance, delusions of grandeur, sexual promiscuity, low self-control, disregard for morality, lack of acceptance of responsibility, callousness, and lack of empathy and remorse. Such an individual may be especially prone to violent and criminal offenses.
  3. A person diagnosed with antisocial or dissocial personality disorder.
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

I don’t know the thoughts of the other user and idk if this makes her a psychopath, but she did oversee an effort to deny prisoners parole just to keep them in California’s prisoner firefighter program to combat wildfires.

The program itself is fairly repugnant to begin with, as the prisoners don’t really have a choice in the matter, it’s tantamount to slavery, and her trying to keep people locked up to bolster it is vile. While California needed more firefighters to combat their wild fire issues, I don’t think slavery is the right solution.

Does that make her a psychopath? I’m not sure. Our definition of anti-social behavior is fairly restricted to what is legal and what isn’t and what she did was legal. But it damn sure is without empathy or remorse and, in a just world, promoting slavery would be considered antisocial behavior, in my humble opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I want to point out that psychopathy is a colloquial term, not a clinical one. The most popular set of criteria, the Psychopathy Checklist - Revised, is not empirically reliable or valid. Its creator Robert Hare has made a lucrative career out of convincing the world (and the prison system) that psychopaths are Definitely Real. The PCL-R is used to justify harsher punishments and longer prison sentences, and it’s completely made up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah, “not 20 years past retirement age” is a pretty low bar to clear, but at least we did it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

The undecided can be convinced during the campaign.

What campaign? The election is in 3.5 months. Every day that Biden doesn’t step down is one less day for Harris to start ramping up her campaign efforts.

Also, please someone do a poll of the undecided who have strong feelings towards…

  • women
  • minorities
  • prosecutors

Although most may fall firmly in the Trump camp, I’m betting there are some undecided who think that women absolutely should not be president.

Not to mention waffling Republicans may be more incentivized to vote if the Democrat isn’t an old white dude.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 174K

    Comments