Summary

Trump renewed calls for the US to annex Greenland for “national security” reasons during an Oval Office briefing, claiming “I think it will happen.”

Greenland’s outgoing Prime Minister Múte Egede responded on Facebook: “Enough is enough,” and planned to summon all Greenland’s political parties for a joint rejection.

Likely incoming Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen also called Trump’s statement “inappropriate.”

Trump also undermined Denmark’s claim to Greenland, saying it was “very far away and really has nothing to do” with the island.

Danish Defense Committee Chairman Rasmus Jarlov warned that US annexation “would mean war between two NATO countries.”

114 points

For what “national security reasons”? I’d like him to elaborate. Is Greenland somehow threatening the US? the only country threatening other countries in the area is the US.

permalink
report
reply
62 points

Let me guess, natural resources.

permalink
report
parent
reply
98 points
*

Also strategic control of the melting and ever more passable Arctic, along with Russia. This also partly explains why Trump wants Canada.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

A sane president who values geopolitical allies would just work out a deal with the host country to install more military bases in the region of concern, rather than burning every partnership we have by being aggressively expansionist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*

They already have strategic control over Greenland. Denmark would let the USA do almost whatever they want on greenland.

Denmark probably were the USAs biggests bitch in Europe until they started threatening Greenlands sovereignity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yep.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Not to detract, but I never noticed how phallic Sweden and Norway looked from that angle

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah, but I thought climate change wasn’t real.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

He has americans convinced that they need to annex greenland to protect them from Russia and China. For some reason they think China is closer to greenland than to Hawaii …

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

But Trump loves Russia, aren’t they great? Why would they ever be a threat?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I don’t know a single American that believes what you just said. Most of us recognize this as bullshit.

Note: I’m not in a deep red state

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t think that most republicans believe they need Greenland for security reasons, but so what? They might as well, or it would be better if they did at least believe this, because the person they voted for and are still supporting is acting like a lunatic. And they are cheering him on, or at least condoning it.

I do believe that that plenty of republicans like Trump threatening former allies like a big and strong businessman/mob boss would do. The same goes for those who think they should grab Greenland for the resources, or just because they can.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I imagine it’s to put defences in the Arctic…

But if Putin and Russia are fantastic and great people why does America need to guard the Arctic?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

For those evil Norwegians, they might try to spread universal Healthcare!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

If anything it’s cause for national insecurity, given that if they invade, per NATO rules, an attack on one is an attack on all.

But Trump is used to getting what he wants by breaking the rules and facing no consequences, so I guess it’ll be a FAFO thing.

I must admit, I do fear that if it comes to that NATO will fight the usual way - strong worded letter. For a buffoon who can’t even read and only responds to a fat stick to the face.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

This is going to be interesting because Article 5 assumes an attack on a member state by a non-member state.

By attacking Greenland, Trump would violate Articles 1 and 2 (pledging to use peaceful means to settle a dispute and contribute to friendly relations though you could argue he’s violating the latter right now).

I think the whole point of this act is to force NATO to kick the US out of NATO, which is exactly what Russia (and by extension Trump) wants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s the same playbook used by Putin with Ukraine

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Probably that “economic freedom safe space” thing he’s been talking about? The one with no rules to follow so the “hard decisions” “rugged individual” “pat’rats” don’t have to put in effort. Isn’t Greenland mostly natives? Yeah that’s probably it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Greenland is one of the only (the only?) largely indigenous governed country (ish) in the world and one of its official languages alongside Danish is Greenlandic, an inuit language. So, yea, for some shitty old white American dude to continue to demand annexing this country is some fucking wild bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’d like Trump, Musk and the whole republican party to go fuck themselves. For national security reasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The most direct route from Russia to the US is North though the Arctic - so during the cold war there was a lot of first strike detection stuff setup in Arctic areas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
91 points

The incoming prime minister should challenge Trump to a one on one fight for Greenland. If he refuses, all state heads should just make chicken noises every time they meet him.

permalink
report
reply
30 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

That doesn’t sound fair to Greenland if/when Trump loses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It will look funny on maps when Canada shorts fit better because of that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Maybe they can just convert it to a cash prize, how much is one Florida worth anyway?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It will look funny on the map when something is cut off

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

“If we win, we get your country, if we lose, you get this garbage heap.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m sure Florida wouldn’t be a garbage heap if it had proper management.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’re supposed to wager something with value, I don’t think any other country would accept florida

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I love this plan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yet again President Camacho would be superior

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
12 points

It’ll be an interesting time in the dumpster fire when Article 5 is invoked against the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I have a feeling he’ll be the one to invoke Article 5, accusing Denmark of some “aggression” or another in his completely fucked-up authoritarian style.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Of one is attacked, it might be 31 countries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

The fucking nerve for Trump to suggest Zelensky is gambling with WWIII. Ukraine is defending its own nation from invasion and the US is breaking every alliance it can find and causing tensions that remind me all too much of the lead up to WWI.

permalink
report
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 163K

    Comments