It’s time to dust off those old CD binders.

61 points

Nah man. If you care about your CDs you should already have them ripped to flac format, so the disc rot can’t kill them. Convert to mp3 vbr0 for tossing them on a player or your phone. Listen with whatever ear buds you like.

It’s not like vinyl or casette tape, where the analog nature of the storage medium is going to effect the sound. CDs are pure digital, just a carrying case for the files on them.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Why mp3 vbr0 and not opus?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The only reason to use mp3 is if you want to play it on old devices. It’s much better to use opus on anything that supports it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, that makes sense.

Thankfully, most things I have support opus, even a very old iPod, thanks to Rockbox.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, i like them converted to opus better. Guess the psychoacoustic compression does something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Or buy your music from a source that offers both. I have flacs from bandcamp, but also CDs from those same albums

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

kobuz baby

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s the first thing I did with all my Frank Zappa cds… converted them to digital and put the cds away so they wouldn’t end up scratched.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I agree about ripping the CDs to files, but disc rot is not a big deal to worry about if you’re storing the CDs properly away from sunlight and heat. Recently I’ve been going through my collection and ripping old CDs of stuff I didn’t have in the digital library… and all my CDs from the 90s that I’ve tried are still good. Many of these are 30+ years old and still sound perfect

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Flac or wav, right? Is flac smaller?

Or go 320kbps mp3…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

wav is uncompressed PCM usually, flac is compressed and as such smaller (difference in size depending on the kind of music), but they’re both lossless with the resulting signal being bit for bit identical to the data on the CD.

320 kbps MP3 makes little sense nowadays except for when you need maximum quality for a device supporting nothing else. For long term storage, use flac.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There’s still some use cases for sure. My 4 gig Garmin running watch (2.5 usable) might play flac but I want more than a few albums on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

Is flac even necessary if they are coming off CDs? A CD is most often 192kbps mp3 format.

Ripping to flac is like ripping a 720p video to 4k and just filling in the extra resolution with black bars.

Edit: this is incorrect. See Captain Aggravated’s comment below.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

This is one of those “they were so concerned with if they could do it, they didn’t stop to think if they should” sort of things.

Portable cd players were never actually that portable, because cds are just big. Minidisc players sure, but those never really caught on. MP3 players, however, caught on because they are small and easily portable, and the library doesn’t take up a binder.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Also portable CD players skipped constantly. Minidisc was way better for that, but then MP3 (and Limewire) hit…

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

With current technology you could make them a lot better. Basically put 700mb of flash memory on the player and rip the whole thing as soon as you put the CD in, then play from flash. But then you get back to why you would want to do something like that again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That was basically how anti-skip worked, albeit with much less memory.

They would buffer the audio for like 10 seconds that way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Heck yeah!

I had a Sony atrak 3+ player back in the day (around 2003-4, probably, because I used it at work) which was just an mp3 file compression alternative served up on a special cd player instead of an mp3 player… they tried… anyway I had a re-writable disc that I’d add stuff to whenever I downloaded it, and I think the one cd had like 1800 songs on it or so (and lots of space left)

That didn’t skip, even working a physical job, unless I banged it against something. Part of why I got it. But when I put regular discs in, they would skip a lot if I didn’t have it laying flat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I loved my MiniDisc player, I wish Sony had opened up the tech.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

No they aren’t

permalink
report
reply
5 points

They are.

Now we just need to wait for the CD to come back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

This may sound crazy, but hear me out. What if instead of a spinning plastic disc we use a spinning metal one, for durability and to reduce movement of the medium while accessing data. It would also allow for much greater storage density if we stack a bunch of them.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

HDD?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Bingo

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But fuck the laser, we’re gonna go back to the record-style reader head

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s not a bad idea if you have a good library, but $180 is crazy

permalink
report
reply
8 points

It’s got a balanced headphone output, so they are obviously targeting the audiophile market.

I don’t know why anyone would want to use a portable CD player though. They scratch up your discs and skip if you move around too much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

What would a balanced output do for the 3 feet of cable that will most likely be connected to it? I mean sure, put it in if you can’t help it, but even though it’s a portable player, no one is gonna take that to the next motor fab where it would benefit from a balanced output, and at home an audiophile most likely already has a better player around.

And yes you’re right - the whole idea is nonsense to begin with. CDs have always been fully digital, so better listening options exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A balanced output will have less crosstalk between the channels. I’ve never used balanced headphones, so I don’t know if it’s noticeable. My guess is the only really noticeable thing is that the higher output voltage swing from the differential amplifiers will make high impedance headphones louder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why not just rip your CDs and play them on a DAP?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.zip

Create post

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Use original link

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

Community stats

  • 2.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 3.6K

    Comments

Community moderators