When the war was turning in Ukraineโs favor and they were about to push into Russia, he shut it off and crippled their counter offensive. I remember. Fuck Elon and fuck starlink.
Theyโre presumably talking about the Kursk Oblast. Edit: probably not, see responses.
IIRC that was long after that. The initial shutoff of Starlink happened around the explosions targeting the Crimean bridge and them introducing their naval drones.
Which is why Starlink needs to be confiscated and managed by NATO. Somebody has to operate it, and it should be an entity who is on the side of Freedom amd Democracy.
Sure it is. You just confiscate the infrastructure that operates them here on earth, and order their employees to comply.
I donโt think that this would be a good idea, but it is definitely doable.
He also challenged Zuck to a cage match and chickened out when Zuck accepted. Theyโre both pieces of shit.
He even chickened out of his recent offer to come on the Daily Show and debate Jon Stewart! Heโs a Nazi coward even when itโs just talkingโฆ
Lol I forgot about that! Yeah fuck em both of course, but I feel like most folks would put their money on the ex-KGB agent who seized and kept control of freakinโ Russia over nepo-baby โgamerโ, โengineerโ Musk. What a goofy threat. And I say that as a middling gamer and engineer myself lol
feel like most folks would put their money on the ex-KGB agent who seized and kept contr
Putin is 5โ 7", like 160 lbs, and 70 years old. Elon is 6โ2", probably 200 lbs, and 52 years old.
I donโt think fitness and training can overcome 20 years, 50 lbs, and a full head of height.
The Tweet linked in the OP is Musk claiming that he challenged Putin to a fist fight.
I hate Zuck but in this match Iโm thinking if itโs not mutually assured destruction, then I might root for Zuck. Elon is becoming a very big problem.
I donโt respect Putin very much, but I am 1000 percent sure that a former KGB agent will whoop Musks ass. Apart from that, wtf is he trying to show with challenging Putin to physical combat. What does that have to do with Ukraine?
Donโt let the fascists fool you, there are alternatives to Starlink. Eutelsat in France, Telesat in Canada and Inmarsat in the UK, just to name a few examples.
My guess is better coverage and latency with its sheer number of satellites.
They use low earth orbit, which require them to use more satellites, but lowered latency.
Technically, and this is purely semantics, coverage is the major downside to starlink. They are faster, though.
The coverage of satellites has an exponential factor of the distance of that satellite to earth. If you had the satellite further out then its signal could reach a wider area before being cut off by the curvature of the earth. However, as the distance increases, so does latency.
Now, I donโt know, but I would assume its the latency. Starlink has a (impressively) low ping of < 100ms, while existing alternatives usually have 600ms+. Now, thatโs only relevant if they are using it for stuff like flying drones.
Starlink has enough uplink to be able to handle live video streams and a latency low enough to do this with simple tools.
Iโm not sure if that still happens, but Iโve seen some pictures of Ukrainian command bunkers literally getting drone feeds using discord screen share.
โBe quiet small manโโฆ smallest dick energy Iโve seen today.
Isnโt it becoming quite widely known now that heโs gotten a bad penile implant?
did elon really say โpipe down pipsqueekโ like that worked well for drake? man people with canadian citizenship gotta stop doing that.