Summary

Trump reversed his directive to fire thousands of probationary (newly-hired) federal employees after a judge ruled the mass terminations were likely illegal.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) clarified that agencies are not required to comply with previous instructions to fire employees who have held their jobs for a year or less. Instead, agencies have until September 13 to develop their own staffing reduction plans.

Some agencies, like the National Science Foundation (NSF), are now rehiring previously fired employees.

Federal labor unions have sued, arguing the firings violated procedural rules and congressional authority. The administration’s sudden reversal still leaves uncertainty about affected workers’ status.

148 points
*

Imagine the loss in productivity from having so many people fired & quickly re-hired. Not just from those people; but the HR & administrative effort; the re-org of responsibilities among the other employees; and the nonsense time it probably took up in so many “mandatory departmental meetings” discussing what was happening…

permalink
report
reply
58 points
*

No doubt. I recently left corporate America (giant global orgs) after almost 30 years. I was involved in these bullshit fire drills with increasing frequency through most of my career. Without fail, they provide short term illusion of savings at the expense of higher long term costs and pain. These people always forget that a lot of smart people put a lot of effort into the existing systems, orgs, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

the top level doesn’t care. our suffering is their joy. they know they must be rich because they are insulated from the problems they cause us

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

yes, that is why we need to remember that billions of lambs can easily take on millions of lions. our problem continues to be lambs that want to fight lambs in the hope that they may someday join the lions. so, we all continue to be hunted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Not to mention every ladder-climbing prick who changes positions in those orgs’ mid to upper levels has to make some big splash in their new role, so they can scheme their way to the next one. AKA each of these decision-making dickheads are incentivized to blow shit up with each new role, and with the express intention of not being there when the chickens come to roost. Seen it quite often, firsthand.

Such an idiotic way to run the biggest coordinations of human effort on the planet, but HEY what the fuck do I know? Stolid, predictable leadership with a commitment to improving outcomes for all stakeholders? Wouldn’t that mean shareholders would do a little less well? Those gaudy yachts and mansions don’t buy themselves…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Don’t get me started LOL! Yeah, let alone all of the mental health issues caused by the continued uncertainty. I estimated my last company lost almost 10,000 YEARS of IT/company experience in just TWO years of such churn with new leaders brought in from the outside.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I swear CRPGs need to be made mandatory for corporate leadership. You will respect the long term 0.05 increase to damage every level you motherfuckers.

Joking aside I do think there should be a dedicated gremlin who’s job is to beat corporate dipshits with a stick everytime they try to pull short term fuckery. Rome wasn’t built in a day, it was built in generations and what do ya know it lasted over two thousand fucking years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Plus the morale kick. “Oh yeah, we fired you a couple weeks ago without making too much of a fuss… but yeah, now get back to work!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

not very… what’s the word?

oh yea: efficient.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That sounds super inefficient. Someone should create a taskforce to look into that inefficiency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No no no.

First you make a meeting to discuss the need for a taskforce.

Then a meeting to discuss the potential budget of the task force.

Then a meeting to select the members of the task force.

And so on until you don’t even need the task force anymore.

Problem solved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

At my site in the VA we lost a essential employee who we probably won’t get back.

And we were also forced into a hiring freeze at the start of the year so I hope they see this and try to come back, because we won’t be able to hire someone else to replace them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ah yes typical Government Efficiency

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Let’s be very clear: this is extremely atypical. There is nothing even slightly normal about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This is partof the point

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points
*

So… funny story (well not funny, horrible).

So a friend of mine recently (within the past 3 years) was motivated to go back to school and get their degree in conservation biology. They had been a chef for a while and were sick of it. I pushed them to quit their job and get back into it, and they did.

They ended up getting an internship with a federal department, and are still technically a probationary employee (not career or term). They are still in school but the work was what they wanted to be doing, so they went for it.

So it turns out, almost all the career and term staff have now been let go. But they, as a probationary employee, are still there. Like somehow they were missed or forgotten. So now, somehow, they are in charge or at least responsible… for almost everything?

Its the smokey the bear meme about “only you; no seriously its just you now” in real life.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

So it turns out, almost all the career and term staff have now been let go. But they, as a probationary employee, are still there. Like somehow they were missed or forgotten. So now, somehow, they are in charge or at least responsible… for almost everything?

His last co-worker as they walked out the door:

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Clearly a surgical strike, just using medical knowledge from the paleolithic

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Congrats to them on the meteoric career advancement, I guess? 😬

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Probably because he hasn’t tried to conserve anything yet. I hear Republicans hate that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Jesus Christ what a fucken shitshow

I guess he’s finally running the country like a Trump business, I just don’t get why the yukyuks think it’s a good idea

permalink
report
reply
36 points

legitimately the apprentice convinced them he’s a business genius even though that was all manufactured, and the true trump is a nepobaby shitstain who can’t outperform an index fund. he’s always gambling, always losing, and always having someone bail him out. first it was daddy, then the bank, then the mob, then the russian federation, and now it’s us, the poor

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I never understood why people liked that (shit) show. I tried watching it once and couldn’t stand listening to his fucking stupidity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I grew up watching it. In the era of linear TV, even with cable we had maaaybe 2 or 3 other legitimate options for family TV time on that night, at that time. It was non-offensive (funny saying that about Trump now), family friendly, reality TV. I know it’s not everyone’s cup of tea, but it was well produced, and mindlessly entertaining.

Now, at the same time, while I understand for many people, “the apprentice convinced them he’s a business genius,” that’s SOOO frustrating. I completely agree with you about “his fucking stupidity.” I think the first few seasons, they cut it well to make him appear intelligent. However, as the show went on, I suspect he wanted more and more screen time, and that distracted from the actual show and that’s when we started to notice “his fucking stupidity” showing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The only one I watched was the one with Gene Simmons. The “goal” was to make I think like $5000 by running a hotdog stand. So Gene, a real businessman, sold one hotdog with his signature to a fan. At the end of the episode Trump fired him. Because of some bullshit reason. I think it was because Trump didn’t like that Gene was more popular than he was and knew how to do marketing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Trump businesses were grifts or fronts for money laundering for the Russians, so yeah, that tracks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

permalink
report
reply
23 points

The uncertainty is by Design

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Gaslighting. Now when feds complain about loosing their jobs, trumpets will say they’re spreading fake news. Also, I know some feds who are also trumpets. Watching their brain explode isn’t worth the apocalypse.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 323K

    Comments