Blue Ghost, a NASA-funded lunar lander built and operated by the private U.S. company Firefly Aerospace, has successfully touched down on the moon.

After 45 days in space—and a pulse-pounding semi-autonomous hour-long descent to its landing site—at 3:34 A.M. EST the boxy, car-sized spacecraft’s four footpad-tipped legs crunched into the surface of Mare Crisium, a vast and ancient impact basin filled with frozen lava on the moon’s northeastern near side. This marks the second time the U.S. has soft-landed on the moon since the crewed Apollo 17 mission of 1972

15 points
*

Fuck that, keep all private enterprise out of space. Polluting our orbit with useless satellites was bad enough.

Do we need to push our unsustainable growth onto lifeless celestial bodies? Why burn our limited resources on astronaut-cosplay rollercoasters for billionaires? Can’t they just go die in a submarine like normal people?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

That submarine also polluted. The ocean nonetheless. Your post is inherently contradictory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Not inherently.

There’s just too much going on in it and it’s not very coherent.

I think what they wanted to say was:

  1. Fuck excessive human greed.
  2. We should focus on fixing problems here on earth, first, before we truly go to space.
  3. Celebrating private enterprises going and claiming space and progressing their investments will most likely exacerbate the existing sociopolitical and economic issues.
  4. Eat the rich
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Article is paywalled.

But that’s awesome! It’s nice to see more (successful) lunar landings, and it’s cool that more private companies are giving it a shot.

permalink
report
reply
-11 points

I really don’t get the hardon for getting humans in space I think we should figure out how much we can max out robots and such doing things and when we simply cannot figure out how to do something without a human then maybe send up bodies.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

What are you on about? This is a robotic mission.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

I realize a lot of online comments are either support or complaint about an article but Im a bit wierd in that sometimes I just comment around the subject. What got me thinking about it is it did not seem to have a rover or anything so was a bit disapointed (unless the article simply did not mention it or felt measurements implied that). So my comment is just on the nasa back to the moon and musks american flags on mars stuff. articles like this just get me thinking about the subject.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

This line of landers is a delivery system. This mission was to prove they can do it successfully. It carried ten scientific experiment payloads, as noted in the article.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asteroid capture doesn’t seem out of the realm of near future possibility. Then we could directly mine and refine materials in space with robots, sparing the earth more climate altering pollution and saving humans from slave work in unregulated mines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

yeah I mean even just trying different tests and working towards it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 322K

    Comments