-8 points
*

Until just now, this guy seemed to be a legit stable Republican: conservative social values and conservative fiscal policy. Apparently, I was mistaken. This guy’s public political values and stances were always what he needed to get ahead. Now, the dude did a surprise complete 180° on Trump, ruining any view of stability and trust the rational public had in him, just to run as Trump’s Vice President? A combat veteran that is now running under a convicted felon that attempted to overthrow the previous presidential election and has evident ties with Russia? No way. The Russians def got dirt on his ass. No one gets to work for Trump unless there’s coercive control. They’ve got kompromat on Vance, so they know he wont be a hero. Instead, he will follow orders. Vance has been compromised.

Looking at the big picture, I’m thinking one of the few ways out of this mess is to give politicians an amnesty period. It will suck to let them get away with it, but they’re getting away with it anyway and bringing the country down in the process. Unless some super clean hero that also has insane political capital comes along, we either we let compromised politicians openly get away with whatever the Russians uncovered and clean up this Russian coup, or we let them get away with it and fall into an autocracy allied with Russia.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

up until now

Idk as an Ohioan, I’ve know this guys a piece of work for at least 8 years. No research was required when the pick was made to understand the ramifications. Dudes a Muppet. my first thought was “Trump got his ‘yes man’ who will do what Pence wouldn’t.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Fellow ohioan as well, and since he has been our senator, I’ve seen him as the walking definition of the German word backpfeifengesicht. He seemed like a weasel to me from the get-go, and I could not for the life of me figure out why.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

He wants power and money. Doesnt need to be compromised.

Just greedy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Until just now, this guy seemed to be a legit stable Republican: conservative social values and conservative fiscal policy.

This article he wrote for the Atlantic in 2016 is striking: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/07/opioid-of-the-masses/489911/

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

JD can fuck off and die, traitorous piece of trash.

permalink
report
reply
79 points

Surprising that Trump would select a peice of shit that shares his views.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Yeah but he doesn’t have any views. He just does whatever benefits him the most.

Oooh nvm yeah he shares his “view.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes surprising. I wondering if it will be surprising to him when Trump gets an angry mob ready to hang him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Someone who also called him an American Hitler.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

He shares what ever views are convenient.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Guy makes better 180 flips then Tony Hawk does.

permalink
report
reply
22 points
*

Cast doubt? That means repeated the “Big Lie”. Show me some evidence, just a shred. If not willing to certify election results this person should be found unfit to serve, in a real democracy of course.

Trumps not in the spotlight. He will have a temper tantrum momentarily

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.8K

    Posts

  • 117K

    Comments