72 points

Good thing the party learn d their lesson and stopped running uncharismatic elderly moderates with terrible approval ratings…

Right?

permalink
report
reply
13 points

The only people who dont vote for the least bad option are the people who have the luxary not to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Edit: blaming others for not showing up to your uninterested non beneficial vote when no one is a hedgemony least of all voters. And refusing to try different tactics cause what if effort has to be applied and it feels pointless or you lose despite trying.

What a nice excuse for losing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How is that an excuse?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

And are selfish fucks

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s “luxury”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

You still understood the point being made, that’s incredible!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If your want people to vote for you give them someone they can stomach. Clinton is a piece of shit and Biden is a zionist with dementia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

If somebody prefers the same genocide under Trump over Biden, there is nothing anybody can to say to them that will change their mind.

If somebody prefers a genocide against trans people in America, and the imprisonment and forced labor of poor people in America, over Biden, that is between them and their God.

But please, keep pretending you are fighting for Palestine when you aren’t even fighting for your own home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

We gotta get us some Approval Voting so people can vote for their true favorite without worrying if it’ll accidentally give them a worse election result.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I agree, until that happens though, all of us are required to choose the least bad option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Is this ever gonna happen, though? I see it like guaranteed under every single social media post that complains about how we don’t have a functional system and while I agree that fptp as a system is bad and horrible, it almost feels like a red herring at this point because it has such a low chance of ever being changed as each party in power, and any party that theoretically ever able to take power, would not stand to benefit from alternative voting. It’s like prison reform or free healthcare or making weed legal or any number of other things that has high levels of voter approval but conveniently never happen because it’s not in the best interest of the party, except this one is possibly more niche and easier to spread misinformation about.

Like I dunno, what’s the M.O. on getting this done? Get it approved in a couple local elections and then just hope it bubbles up from there? I know in oregon there’s supposed to be some referendum on it, but I kind of doubt it’s going to pass even though I’m gonna vote for it. I seriously don’t see it happening, at least on a federal level, without some extremely serious reform that basically completely reworks how the government currently functions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No no no, you don’t understand, you can only ever be critical of one thing at a time, so either you don’t care about people not voting or you think every candidate and campaign the Democratic party has ever run was flawless, you have to pick one or the other /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

How the fuck did they go from Obama to Hillary to this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

They didn’t, they TRIED to run Hillary in 2008. Obama was the party outsider who won by a tiny margin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And then the Clinton supporters lost their shit and protested it, using the same sort of rhetoric Bernie supporters used eight years later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I’m proud I didn’t vote Blue in 2016 and 2020. I’m not from the USA so it would be a voter fraud if I did.

That being said, dems are completely incompetent when it comes to elections, deliberately picking such terrible candidates like Hillary and Biden. I don’t believe there are actual people that voted Blue because of seeded candidate and not despite it.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

And even still, considering the alternative, not voting was worse. And it continues to be worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Not to excuse the Democratic Party, but I would argue that it’s inevitable that they choose shit candidates for the presidency when we consider how much indoctrination Americans get over their capitalism/corporatism and how they justify and normalize the shit America did and the status quo, while omitting a lot of the important progressive historical events or (in the case of figures like MLK and Gandhi, or context behind Iran/Latin America/Israel&Palestine) don’t tell the full story. Like most Americans aren’t going to learn that the US denied millions of Jews, Roma, and other groups being displaced entry into the country right before the holocaust, leading to the deaths of millions. You also won’t learn that the US installed multiple fascist dictators, monarchs, etc. in countries after overthrowing democratic governments to serve corporate intrests or over their fear of leftist leaders. At best you might briefly touch on the wars with Iraq in government class or something.

Then you’re basically indoctrinated by history classes and society that anything left of American corporatism is communism. To the point that modern conservatives genuinely think FDR policies are extreme socialist/communist policies.

With our current voting system, an actually social democratic president would not get elected. FDR, Truman, Johnson, and Carter were the closest we could get in that regard, but those days are long gone.

That being said, I do think a lot of people genuinely voted for Hillary because of her and not solely because of Trump. Especially women and LGBTQ who wanted like… more gender equality. I think more accurately would be that there are very few white guys who voted for Hillary for any reason other than Trump being worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I agree with most of your points except with one about socialists being unelectable - I believe that Bernie would have moped the floor with Trump in 2016, and even more so in 2020. First woman president had a nice ring to it, but Hillary performed terribly, and with her being basicially an aristocrat of the establishment, lots of people hated her from the get go. They shanked Bernie so their corporate overlord donors wouldn’t get pissy, and voters treated that as betrayal. After very solid 8 years of Obama it get like Dems had this victory in their pocket regardless of what they do, and they commited to proving that hunch wrong. That’s at least the vibes I got from watching the elections from Europe, I did hear that Obama wasn’t as popular as he seemed to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
18 points

Republicans haven’t won a popular vote in over 30 years or so. We all know its bullshit, democrats just have a vested interest in keeping up the illusion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

This is a fatal flaw of forgetting that your vote affects state politics which, arguably, is more impactful on your day to day matters than federal issues.

Also if you push your state more to the left, the greater odds of the NPVIC being triggered which automatically enables a national popular vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Republicans haven’t won a popular vote in over 30 years or so.

George W. Bush won the popular vote in 2004.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Republicans win the popular vote in the past 30 years except for that one time America was super bloodthirsty and wanted a hawk in the white house

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

And it only took checks notes 9/11.

1/3 is still a bad track record.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The rest of the world has it figured out that when the USA talks about democracy, it’s fucking lying. Americans still have yet to figure that out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Hillary was and remains terrible. They should have given me someone who wasn’t repellant. I voted Dem in every election up until that one and then I stayed home. I will not apologize for them fucking up.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Whatever you gotta tell yourself. It’d be great if you’d help us not succumb to religious fascism as run by a sociopathic rapist, sir. Please, sir.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-30 points

How many of those registered Democrats were in a state that was +10% for either of the candidates?

Local and state races are also important and you should vote in them even if your state is a lock, but if you know for a fact your vote for president won’t matter why cast it? To give the Democrats an even greater sense of smugness at winning the popular vote despite losing the election?

permalink
report
reply
17 points

https://www.cnn.com/election/2020/results/president

The difference in the 2020 election was about 7 million votes. Even with the electoral college, another 40 million votes not impacting the 2024 election would be statistically improbable. Biden would win in an unprecedented landslide.

We know what states have been swing states before. We don’t know which states will be swing states in 2024 with 100% accuracy. If enough people didn’t vote, any state would become a swing state. If everyone who has said “your vote for president won’t matter” or equivalent voted we would see radically different results in US elections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If all those votes were in already blue states it wouldn’t have changed anything.

But I’m making the mistake of assuming voters are acting rationally and understand the rules of the game, which they don’t. They’re not going to, like I did, not vote for the presidential candidate because I keep an eye on the polls and know that it’s going 2:1 to someone but continue to vote down ballot. They’re just not voting because reasons.

We’d all be well-served to stop thinking of voters as rational people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

If all those votes were in already blue states it wouldn’t have changed anything.

That’s ridiculously unlikely. Also, what’s a blue state now may be a swing state on election day.

They’re not going to, like I did, not vote for the presidential candidate because I keep an eye on the polls and know that it’s going 2:1 to someone but continue to vote down ballot.

Polls gauge approval, which is only an approximation for who people are going to vote for. The polls aren’t supposed to be a guide for who to vote for. Vote for democracy and against fascism.

We’d all be well-served to stop thinking of voters as rational people.

It’s better to think of people as self-interested. Being self-interested does not imply a person will necessarily act or even know how to act in their own self-interest. If life was a game of perfect of information the vast majority of people would make decisions that were actually in their own self-interest. As opposed to real life where global temperatures and fascism are on the rise. It’s not for a lack of rationality that people are sleep walking into fascism. It’s a lack of knowledge and critical thinking skills. edit: typo

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I mean ignoring the fact that you already mentioned about local and state races being immensely important, unbelievably important, there is something to be said of the notion of a president’s winning an election despite an overwhelming majority voting against him. That’s not nothing. If only for the moral message to the people of what a corrupt system we have. But also the Practical effects of it. The pressure that puts on politicians the pressure that puts on the parties the pressure that puts on legislation, the pressure that puts on future campaigning and financing, it all matters. In politics everything is connected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If only for the moral message to the people of what a corrupt system we have.

I would think that would make people even less likely to vote, since they think it doesn’t do anything.

The pressure that puts on politicians the pressure that puts on the parties the pressure that puts on legislation, the pressure that puts on future campaigning and financing, it all matters.

I don’t believe this. Both Bush II and Trump acted like they had some kind of massive mandate despite losing the popular vote. Maybe if the shoe was on the other foot and it was Democrats winning without getting the most votes they’d be introspective enough to change tactics, but Republicans don’t give a fuck.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Political Memes

!politicalmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 52K

    Comments