Summary

A federal judge in Rhode Island ordered the Trump administration to unfreeze federal funding, accusing it of violating a previous court ruling.

The lawsuit, filed by 22 states and D.C., argues the freeze is unconstitutional and causing harm. Trump, JD Vance, and Elon Musk have suggested defying court orders.

The administration appealed the ruling, while legal experts warn officials like the Treasury Secretary could face contempt charges if they ignore it.

The case tests executive power limits and judicial authority.

138 points

I’m sure he’ll listen this time judge.

permalink
report
reply
61 points

I’m actually really hoping he doesn’t. It’s better we get this over with sooner than later. Piss the courts and the legislature off before he has gathered enough of a foothold

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Speed run the end of democracy! LFG!

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

The democracy part was already over when he ignored Congress, this is just accelerating the time period from no longer being a republic to the deciding moments of what will become.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

This is really the ideal path. Fracture fast, begin the healing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Also if there is going to be a war, I’d rather it be in my mid 30s than late +. And before my niece and nephews are old enough to l remember it would be nice.

Also while some media still exists that isn’t fully owned by them

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

i’m actually with you on this one. i’m tired of the dread. let’s get this fucking shit show over with. i need to know if humanity prevails or not. if not, that’s fine. we were an inferior species that deserves whatever we get. it’s just a shame what ecological destruction our downfall is going to wreak. the plants and animals didn’t deserve it.

i just can’t go on knowing that what we’re living in right now will continue. if it does, we are truly in hell and i must have done something very wrong a long time ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

It is literally in their playbook, ignore court orders. Dark Gothic MAGA is terrifying

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

This video is prophetic and I highly encourage everyone to watch it. It sounds like a conspiracy theory except we see virtually all of it happening in front of our own eyes right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

And it was posted 3 months ago

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

holy shit, how have I not heard of this

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not sure. Seen it browsing All a handful of times, it is Absolutely Mind Blowing seeing how this all turning out

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I know right? Usually felons don’t listen to the legal system.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Especially when they have not one but 34 felony convictions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
106 points
*

Curious if there will be a “straw that broke the camels back” moment with america and this president or is everything he ever does just going to be taken by the public. Im sure the french would have a guillotine out by now

permalink
report
reply
89 points

I just wanna know where all the “I need guns to fight back against tyranny” people are. They’re reeeeal quiet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Responsible gun owners don’t crow about their weapons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Sure, but there are PLENTY of irresponsible ones screaming that nonsense every time a school shooting happens. It’s not like they’re rare specimens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

a not insignificant portion of those people support the current administration. tyranny to them is Dems in control of government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

They won’t do shit, to them that’s not tyranny because their team won.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I agree. Lots of talk, all the walking has been backwards…

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points
*

Fascism is not exactly sustainable. If not the people or the military, he is bound to piss off someone close to him enough to betray him eventually.

The issue is how many lives will be lost in the process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I’m very curious to what will be the “moment”

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Yeah. This is definitely what I would call “the cool zone”.

In the moments between bouts of existential dread, I am at the edge of my seat!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Looking for the next assassination of Arch-Duke Ferdinand?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Here’s hoping there’s a Jaime Lannister out there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This is the camel not the straw.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

https://fedia.io/m/history@lemmy.world/t/1432476/An-excerpt-from-They-Thought-They-Were-Free-The-Germans

No, there won’t be one. Can only hope some generals of us armed forces decide to try a coup or start a civil war.

https://fedia.io/m/history@lemmy.world/t/1432476/An-excerpt-from-They-Thought-They-Were-Free-The-Germans

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I was hoping for a reenactment of Our American Cousin during halftime, myself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Perhaps he could ride in a motorcade in Dallas sometime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
98 points
*

Ok, the last time he violated a judge’s orders, the charges were much more serious and he was facing potential jail time, both from the criminal trial he was a part of and the gag order imposed on him.

He all-but told the judge to go fuck himself on a daily basis right outside the courtroom, violated the gag order ten fucking times, and received exactly no punishment. And that was when he was a criminal defendant.

He’s now President of the United States, has all three branches of government in his back pocket, and was basically anointed as a king by the Supreme Court, who declared he’s all but immune from prosecution.

And this judge thinks he’s going to obey his orders this time? He told you guys to fuck off on the daily when he was a civilian, and y’all did exactly nothing about it. Now he’s POTUS. The fuck is he planning on doing about it now when he violates his orders again? Send out more orders? Trump could literally tell this guy to go fuck himself and his orders with a chainsaw live on television and there’s fuck-all he can do about it.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

So you want the judge to give him a pass?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

the hottest take i think I have ever seen. well done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

“and this judge thinks”

You can’t just bitch any time someone tries to do something. Does this judge think he’s going to single handedly rein in this fascist administration? No, probably not. Should he try anyway? Absolutely.

We don’t need more Robert Muellers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I want the judge to put in writing actual consequences that will be followed through on when Trump refuses to comply.

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points

It will be really interesting for the supreme court to decide if a president can be held in contempt of court.

permalink
report
reply
57 points
*

It doesn’t even need to go that far. The next step after failure to comply with a court order would be dispatching the US Marshalls. They report to the DoJ, so I’d say that’s pretty unlikely.

Scholars and pundits are saying that act of inhibiting their own accountability will be the official end of the US government as it was designed, and the official beginning of an authoritarian regime.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

That “official acts” rule is gonna do a lot of heavy lifting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s the trick though. Contempt of court isn’t the same as breaking a law and doesn’t have the same restrictions. For example, a person can be held in jail for contempt indefinitely without trial until the person yields to the demand of the judge. This sometimes happens to people who refuse to pay child support that the courts know they can afford.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Do they bite the hand that feeds them to appease their ego.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

So the circus continues. Another day, another contempt-of-decency performance from the executive branch’s greatest hits. McConnell’s ruling isn’t just a legal smackdown—it’s a neon sign flashing “constitutional arson in progress.”

Funny how “irreparable harm” gets shrugged off like a minor paperwork error. The admin’s playbook? Gaslight, obstruct, project until the courts buckle under sheer audacity. Democracy’s not just teetering—it’s doing backflips off a cliff while they bet on which branch breaks first.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 316K

    Comments