Summary

During a House Oversight Committee hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) repeatedly shouted an anti-trans slur despite objections from Democratic Rep. Gerald Connolly.

She defended her remarks by attacking transgender rights and dismissing criticism.

The outburst drew condemnation from LGBTQ+ advocates and political figures, highlighting her shift from previously supporting LGBTQ+ rights to embracing anti-trans rhetoric.

Mace has used the slur in past statements and introduced legislation restricting transgender rights.

63 points

Methinks this Caitlyn Jenner doppelgänger doth protest too much.

permalink
report
reply
83 points

Bigoted bitch

permalink
report
reply
43 points

How come the reporting is censoring the word?

permalink
report
reply
-18 points

Right, I mean what the fuck is a trans slur?

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Most likely tr**ny

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They use that word in “family friendly” automotive related YouTube channels all the time without getting dinged for demonitization or bans etc. Maybe their moderators have learned context?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That used to be the word I used for the tranmission of my car. Not any more. Bigots spoil everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

Hate speech is censored to avoid normalizing language intended to encourage violence against the disempowered.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Oooh, nicely put.

Before your comment, I was thinking, “why not show the word? What word could it be? I’m a big boy and it won’t hurt me,” but … after your comment I think I get it.

I may have to take this away and think on it, and thank you for the catalyst.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Fuck yeah. Personal growth for the win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not quite as sold on it as the rest of the internet. Personally. About 5-6 years ago, people started bleeping every single goddamn word that could in any way be construed as troublesome, triggering, or any word directly tied to a controversial topic.

“Kll, rpe, mrder, pssy, dck, a**hole, fck, cndm, scde, terrrst, rtrd, gy, fgt, gncde,” I mean the list just goes on and on and ON & there’s no real objective standard. Everyone enforces the asterisks on a whim, just how they feel that day, and suddenly an article becomes a round on Wheel of Fortune. I’d like to buy a vowel, please??

Then cvid hit, and everybody’s talking about vccnes, the shot, the jab, the Fauci ouchie, etc. Vaxx. 🙄

Idk I’m just over it, I say the words. Except for “the n-word” and other overtly racial slurs. I can’t fully articulate my reasoning behind this; like you, I’m going to have to think on it. But I just view it as political correctness, controlling words & controlling, restricting conversation about uncomfortable topics to game things in their favor. Hijacking Christian values like decency & submission, manipulating their emotions to railroad their thinking into the mainstream. Idk. I’m just…pro-free speech & anti-whatever the fuck you want to call this nonsense.

You can be pro-free speech, and not censor the words, and people will still be subject to the consequences of their speech. 🙂

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah but you could report without reporting the word if that is the case. You could keep the fact “the slur has been used” yet they go the extra mile to put it and censored it it. The reporting should just say the fact that a representative used a discriminatory language. I agree with you that we are on for 4 years of hyper normalization https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HyperNormalisation

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

It makes no sense. How people know the word that should not be normalized? I’m non-native speaker and after all blah blah in this thread I still have no idea what is the word. So if someone says it, I won’t even know I should call out that person. Don’t we normalize using slurs by softening reporting? If slur censored why would bigots stop using it if they are not properly shamed? All it does is just hiding issue from media with no effect IRL. IRL, US elected bigot

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m going to send it to you in a DM. I agree with you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Google “trans slurs.” You’ll find it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s pretty funny. The whole article is about her using a specific slur but it won’t even mention what the slur was. Well done good reporting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
201 points
*

This is a government of the absolute worst people.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

For the absolute worst. The votes were not rigged.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

We’re not going to take this lying down

The votes were not rigged, more reason for us to be ready.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-66 points

Gross. You are become them. Classic American - apply a bit of stress and you cry Guns!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

With the presence of russian tails and donald telling people not to vote he has plenty, doubt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Read this and tell me what you think please. I was convinced everything was mostly legit until I read that. Author provides their credentials at the end if you want to check that out before wasting your time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There’s actually a word for it:

Kakistocracy

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

It manages at once to be a kakistocracy, an oligopoly, a plutocracy and a kleptocracy - which makes sense since the very worst people are the few ultra-rich guys who scrambled to the top by stealing from everyone else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

damn. i don’t know much about her other than she’s been pretty vocal about UAP transparency. sucks that she’s an asshole too.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I bet she has a nice cock.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 316K

    Comments