Video of the speech here, he really did hit it out of the park:

(Biden at the 1 hour, 31 minute mark, 1 hour, 38 minutes for Biden at the microphone)

https://www.youtube.com/live/FKc8c_23lSI

-10 points

Yes, attack the media when you don’t like their coverage. Great idea.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

I mean, if they’re going to harp on Biden forgetting names, it seems prudent to point out they’re giving Trump a pass…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t think it’s a good strategy, I don’t really buy this narrative that the media is so mean to Biden, and it’s bad for society to criticize good journalists just because their coverage is unfavorable to you.

If anything, the media is too kind to Biden. They should be ruthlessly honest in reporting on political leaders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean just in general media does not always equate to the truth, it’s not a thing of it being kind or not. It’s what gets them the most views.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yeah, I don’t like Trump either, buddy.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Why hasn’t trump responded to this yet? It’s like he’s hiding somewhere. I’m seeing more and more Republicans refusing to endorse trump, or actively voting against him:

https://lemmy.world/post/17502127

I just don’t see how he can make it to the election. Eventually he’s going to have to drop out so Republicans can nominate someone else.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

The speech just ended a little bit ago, I’m sure it will be on Truth Social tonight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I think he’s slowing down. People have been saying that more and more recently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I’ve been seeing your posts all day and I’m loving them. That’s all. Have a great day!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I don’t know that any amount of homeruns will help at this point. The barn door is open, the horses have bolted. A significant minority of his party has openly called for him to step down, and one of the most influential members all but asked him to drop out in a public statement. That’s going to be a millstone around his neck going forward.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

It will be, but if he can hold it together for one more month, then have a stellar performance at the convention, it will go a long way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That man is supposed to hold the office for 4 more years, not one more month.

Dems were so fucking arrogant in 2016, they are doing the same thing again. They can’t read the room 😕

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The contingencies for a President dying in office are rigorously tested by time. A fascist takeover the likes of this has never happened in America. I’ll take electing someone who might not make it the four years, or really whoever isn’t the guy trying to turn this place into a christian version of the Taliban’s Afghanistan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

He’s pissed.

Pissed Joe is the best Joe. After listening to Michael Steele on the way home tonight, I’m optimistic about Joe’s chances now.

After the debate performance and the various gaffs he always makes, he’s statistically tied. If he keeps hammering Project 2025, the corrupt courts, and what the Trump presidency will do, he can pull this off. He has to keep this up through both debates and do alright through those.

Roll up those sleeves, gird those loins, and educate just what project 2025 will do!

permalink
report
reply
2 points

When you start checking those page numbers (if this is the same version that’s been circulating) you may find that they don’t line up to those plans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He has to keep this up through both debates and do alright through those.

there’s more than one more?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Vice presidential is one to watch.

If Harris eats whatever sludge he throws up there alive, shows that she’s presidential material, and hammers project 2025. Just talk about that and that alone. That one thing and one thing alone will win this.

It’s has:

Abandonment of veterans

Subjugation of women

A gigantic expansion of the government via the border patrol and religion

Purposeful weakening of the US dollar

Gigantic gift again to the 1%

Abandonment of our kids via abolishing Dept of Education and feeding them (a huge portion of the population actually depends on this meal especially in red states)

It ticks every goddamn box imaginable lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Something I frequently see missing from discussions on Project 2025 is the criminalization of trans people, very clearly calling for their murder. It labels trans people as pornography, pornography as child abuse, and calls for the death penalty for child abusers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Thank you, I’ve been raising this alarm for at least two years since Florida came up with this combo wombo. No one believes me.

This is why I’m looking at my options for exit strategies right now. I know I’ll be among the first sent to the camps.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.1K

    Posts

  • 125K

    Comments