62 points

Most people engaged in politics have likely made up their mind, and anyone sufficiently disengaged will vote for the incumbent and be done with it. Biden is the incumbent, and they’re not going to put forth a progressive.

permalink
report
reply
55 points
*

Yeah

The race is not people deciding between Biden and Trump, but people on both sides who have made up their minds deciding whether or not to vote

Coincidentally, there is an enormous effort to paint voting as not worthwhile, and Biden as not good enough to be worthwhile bothering to vote for, aimed at left wing voters

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

Actual left-winger here. We’ve been saying the USA deserves better than Biden since before the 2020 election. Don’t lump us in with the centrists, liberals, and moderates who’ve only just pulled their heads out of the sand long enough to notice that the incumbent is expected to lose.

There’s no point in starting to panic now, all this has been inevitable since the DNC won the right to rig their own primary after the disaster that was the “Her Turn” campaign in 2016. Either y’all start calling your reps and demanding a better option on the ballot, or start making preparations for the fascism and civil unrest in our future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Highly infuriated with the Dems over Biden in 2020 BUT he has turned out remarkably better than I ever thought. He now has a decent track record that makes him a good choice for another 4 years. On the other hand, we could go all dictator/fascist and lose all democracy. It comes down to Joe Biden who is now the one hope to save democracy.
Take the bus that gets you closest to your destination folks. In the meantime, get progressives into offices at local and state levels so they can move up to congressional levels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

Its good to know progressives will hold our country hostage rather than take baby steps to a progressive country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Yes. Enormous efforts. “Genocide Joe” (the name) is part of that effort.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

There is one in this comments section

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

This is how effective psyops works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Joe Biden is on track to win this election. Democrats are hell bent on snatching defeat from the mouth of victory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Most people are just now waking up and paying attention while Biden’s numbers are beginning to climb, in spite of his own party trying to sabotage him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Anyone sufficiently disengaged with Biden might just NOT vote. And then Trump wins. Heres a better framing of the question. Could anyone generate more voter disengagement than Biden?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

This is my worry too. They’re not going to switch to trump, they’ll either skip it or vote 3rd party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Vote blue no matter who died quickly I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Those people are still voting blue. The issue is getting everyone else on board. “Vote blue no matter who” can’t carry the election entirely on its own and never could. 2020 was won on razor margins.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

We need to get rid of the electoral college.

Biden beat Trump by 7 million votes. That it was “razor thin” is because of the electoral college.

Hillary lost to Trump despite winning the popular vote by 3 million because of the electoral college.

Gore lost because of Florida’s electoral college (and all the fuckery there) despite winning the popular vote by 0.5million.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

they’re not going to put forth a progressive.

The corporate media would shred a real progressive but Biden is a lot more progressive leaning than I ever thought he would be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah, that’s part of why I’m so suspicious of this massive “Biden needs to be replaced” push. We’re not getting better policy out of it, and I seriously doubt it’ll hurt Trump’s odds at re-election, so why is everyone so keen on it at this stage? The time to replace him was months ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Exactly!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A travesty then, considering polling consistently shows progressives would wallop Trump, and the Dems claim that democracy is on the line this election. We could do so much better, but absolutely will not at the peril of capital.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We have narrow margins these days. Elections are decided by the undecided.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Who are these undecided voters? I haven’t met one single undecided voter in the past 8 or more years. Maybe that’s geography, but, jeez…

I feel that turnout is a far bigger factor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

some of them are people like me who was forced to accept inescapable student loan debt (created by biden in 2005) due to don’t ask don’t tell blocking gays from getting the gi bill (supported by biden in 1993); couldn’t sponsor their life partner to allow them to stay in this country because biden et al. voted for doma in 1996; denied jobs because because biden advocated for the same thing executive order 10450 did until 2012; will lose a new job because of biden’s support for banning tiktok in january of 2025; and can’t get a new gig job because biden is blocking truly affordable EV’s from this country for the foreseeable future.

it’s got nothing to do with project 2025 nor trump being a giant douchebag; it’s about trying to convince myself to vote for someone with a conservative history that has and will fuck up my life and then pretending that he’s the most progressive president ever just to get votes while simultaneously enabling genocide’s, apartheid’s and segregationists as biden has done several times over in the last 51 years.

i need a reason to vote for him because; no matter how shitty trump or how badly he wants to steamroll over minorities (which biden has already done), he’s never fucked with my life to anywhere near the extent that biden has and i survived most of those 51 years at a time when both parties, plus moderates, plus family wanted to lock people like me up and throw away the key, so project 2025 doesn’t scare me and trump doesn’t have enough time to screw with my life to the same extent that biden did to people like me in one more term.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

It’s pretty likely that a lot of those disengaged will not vote for Biden because they know he’s too old

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Biden is cooked. But there is so much fear/exhaustion/disgust with Trump we are still in the margin of error.

Imagine if the Democrats ran somebody that anybody was actually positively excited about.

But that is not how the DNC works.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

In 2024, who would that be? Who would you be excited about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Literally anyone under 50 years old

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How about, oh I don’t know, 62 as your ceiling. 50 is young as heck in that environment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’d rather vote for Bernie or Newsom, personally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

The DNC ran the person primary voters nominated

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Funny, my ballot only had one name you could pick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Yep, and I didn’t even vote for him then. Wish more people had done the same to show the party how unenthusiastic we were about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

No prominent Democrat would dare challenge Biden before he drops out for fear of party retaliation. The two party system is the real issue here. Until we abolish it our best hope is things don’t get worse because they won’t get better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Money, nepotism, and other corrupting things are pretty big factors in politics

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We weren’t allowed to nominate anyone else. Did you miss that part?

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

I’m absolutely sick of mainstream media trying to hose the democratic candidate by suggesting the guaranteed-suicidal act of switching out the incumbent. They know it’s failed every time. They still bring that up as news.

Find something else controversial to pin your ad revenue onto.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
  1. They are polling dead even; even if the polls are garbage that’s some sort of indication that “guaranteed winner” is false no matter how hard people keep repeating it
  2. That said, I get what you’re getting at. It’s really too bad there’s that big stasis rift in reality that means nothing can possibly change except replacing Biden with some other candidate, and that that action and that action alone is guaranteed to produce a good result, no matter how we do it.

Fucking rift

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

The only suicide pact is riding a senile candidate into the sunset while there’s still a chance to get off the ride.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Are we talking about Trump now? Man I wish I could keep track of senile old bastards. Because my senile old bastards are yelling incoherent crap and not actually in the conversation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

As a matter of fact, we are talking about Trump. Any halfway decent 45-57 year old candidate will easily show Trump’s advanced age and cognitive decline. But we don’t get to run that race, because our candidate sounds like Grandpa did, the year before we put him in a nursing home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This fucking narrative of bringing up trump every time someone questions Biden as a candidate is so fucking obnoxious.

We all know trump is senile and fucking insane. His voters are insane. We’re talking about wether or not Biden is the best candidate to defeat him. Not everyone agrees with the narrative that swapping candidates right now is a bad idea.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Unfortunately no. I wish. But all the wishing in the world doesn’t change the position.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

The Democrats have had YEARS to endorse anyone who was born after the Battle of the Bulge. With the election less than 4 months away, it is WAY too late to pick Biden’s successor.

They need to come with a campaign message that shows ordinary people why Biden is a better choice than Trump, which should be the easiest g*ddamn thing in the world.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

The Democrat “voters” haven’t had a choice. It’s the Democrat party that has pushed for Biden so hard and not allowed any opportunity for voters to choice someone else before now.

The democratic party wants Biden as president.

I suspect the majority of Democrat voters do not want him to run again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“Democrat voters” “Democrat party”

I asked about this curious phrasing in this comment - what’s your take on it? Why do you think there might be a notable overlap between the users who are so fed up with the Democratic Party that they’re against Biden, and the users who even though they are obviously left wing people, use a traditionally conservative turn of phrase?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I happen to be in this thread due to bouncing around, so I’ll explain anytime I use Democrat/Democratic/Republican:

I’ve had various liberals tell me Democrat was a form of dog whistle or sign I’m a right winger. One person started to dig into my mutual aid info trying to figure out if I was a Russian bot because I said “Democrat” instead of Democratic. I’ve tried to Democratic as a noun, and it felt grammatically incorrect. “I’m running as a Democatic.” “The current majority in the house is with the Democratics.”

Personally I think “Democrat” works for both candidate, party, and voter. “Biden is the Democrat’s Nominee” vs “Biden is the Democratic nominee”.

I have no idea if one is better than the other, but I tend to use one over the other when needed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Almost like… now hear me out… they don’t want to win…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The establishment has been keeping his mental decline as secret as possible for quite some time now. They had the time and squandered it. Now the narrative of is he fit for the presidency is going to dominate any other factor to the election. If I’m being honest with myself, he’s done. We’re just currently salvaging as much as we can and push the never-trump narrative hard and pray.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s annoying that most everyone can understand this, but the media keeps pretending like it’s an open question.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because they are pushing a narrative. They aren’t being honest that no one is prepared to take over, no one else has been campaigning. Even if people wanted a replacement, there isn’t one ready to take on the mantle.

They are intentionally sowing discord.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

The answer is Bernie Sanders in 2020 and in 2016. Now? Probably nobody.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Bernie would still win. Just has to publicly recognize his old age while also showing that he’s not senile like the other 2, agree to one term, pick a good young progressive VP, and start hammering away at progressive messaging. Probably outright tell the center Dems it’s THEIR turn to hold their noses… Unless they want Trump to win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Sanders is only one year older than Biden

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

But decades younger when it comes to soundness of mind

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This would be a dream come true!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Harris is actually polling better than Biden against Trump. I know the Internet never forgets but the people do.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 187K

    Comments