Cohen served time for lying to Congress and other crimes.

31 points

Bro is shitting himself about what’s going to happen to him for betraying the supreme leader.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Didn’t this guy testify against the orange asshole? I’ve lost track and I’m not looking it up; Lemmy is already turning into something I use less because of all the election-related news. That’s not knocking Lemmy, it’s just that time in general and I need to reduce my news intake or be depressed.

permalink
report
reply
21 points
*

Michael Cohen was Trump’s long-time “fixer,” up until he pled guilty to and was sentenced to prison for eight federal counts, including criminal tax evasion and campaign finance violations. Since that time, he has been very outspoken about exactly who Donald Trump is and what he does to people.

Michael Cohen pled guilty in federal court to his criminal actions in relation to the exact same scheme that Donald Trump was recently convicted of in New York State.

So, yes, when Trump was on trial in New York State (the criminal one), Cohen testified for the prosecution. It seems ridiculous that Cohen would enter into a plea deal that included prison time, where Trump, who was convicted by a jury of 34 counts for the exact same thing, and without a plea deal is going to get off more easily.

(Yes, yes, I know that Cohen pled to different charges than Trump was convicted of. This doesn’t make the difference in outcomes for Trump vs. Cohen any less frustrating.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thanks for clearing that up. I sorta thought so, but there’s so many shitheads tied to this guy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

he certainly testified as a prosecution witness in the business records case where trump wàs the defendant, which led to a conviction. That was pretty recent compared to Cohen’s judicial problems, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

a conviction.

Thirty-four convictions, in fact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’re saying the adjudicated rapist dindu it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Actually, following the logic of the Supreme Court’s most recent ruling, Trump would be immune from lawsuits because he did it as an official act as President, even if his motives were clearly corrupt. That, according to the supreme court, no longer matters. It was an official act of the President of the United States and therefore immune from civil or criminal liability. Michael Cohen has no legal recourse.

Given the pattern of this court’s recent rulings, this could backfire spectacularly if the SC decides to use this case to further expand Trump’s power. I do see a very real possibility of the Supreme Court not only dismissing Cohen’s case, but ruling that no private citizen has legal standing to sue the President for any actions taken while in office. This would make the reversal of this recent ruling all but impossible by saying nobody has standing to change it.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Then we all band together and sue the president with a class action lawsuit. Right? Right???

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No we all band together to keep this criminal from ever being elected President again

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.2K

    Posts

  • 88K

    Comments