28 points

this isnt so much a financial thing as it is political. the whole debt limit thing existing is an artifact and should be removed from the process.

but its too valuable as a political tool now so conservatives love to beat everyone over the head with it. assholes.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

Wasn’t it the Dems that held it over this time? Wasn’t the last political news that DT wanted to blow up the debt limit and congress basically said F-off that’s our power?

I mean, I’m all for giving a middle finger to the GOP, but let’s not put blinders on here, Congress has ceded so much of their power to the presidency (or deferred to judges) that the debt thing is one of the few tools they still have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No, he only wanted it suspended while he’s in power, but not repealed. Then do the usual repugnican thing of spending like crazy on tax breaks for the rich and force cuts to public services when the dems are back in power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

only one party has actively caused the government to literally shut down over this instead of cooperating. guess which one.

but i agree, both parties are complicit to some degree. when i say conservatives, that includes the majority of the democratic party.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Step 1: Pass a budget

Step 2: Refuse to fund said budget

Step 3: ???

Step 4: Profit?

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Step 3 is “successfully blame democrats for turmoil”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Step 3 includes the qons holding a gun to the head of the American people. Because only the Democrats care about any of that, the qons know this will work to get what they want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

On one hand, I would like the first thing Trump does when he gets back into office to be to default and lead America into years of economic downturn.

On the other hand, I don’t want to live through YET another economic downturn.

On the practical side of things, their is enough Democrats and a handful of Republicans in the house and senate that will vote for anything that raises the debt limit to get it passed - the only barrier is scheduling a vote in the house. When democrats only will vote for a democratic speaker and republicans can only loose 3 votes off of a majority and recall with 1 vote, the needed vote to pass the house becomes 436-2.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Going backwards. House rules have been changed and it takes more than one member to bring a motion to Vacate.

Trump is today supporting Johnson so maybe he’ll be reelected speaker.

I don’t know what Democrats will do, but they won’t open the debt limit to unlimit debt as Trump wants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

We’re going into an economic downturn regardless of who holds the political football

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How so?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Just observations based on everyday life. I work in an industry that IMO acts as a canary in the coal mine for all sorts of broader societal issues. People aren’t spending money like they did even last year. And these are people with money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I wish this stupid farce could just be done away with entirely. It’s just so stupid and just a mechanism for the qons to hold a gun to the head of the American people.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

The Debt Limit is placed on the Treasury to allow them to pay for money already spent by the government. Essentially, it limits the amount of debt the Treasury can draw down on. Without it, the bills aren’t paid.

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

The debt limit was an invention in WW2 to allow the executive branch to change spending priorities for the war without needing to push a new budget through Congress each time. The intent was to give the executive branch more flexibility, within limits, NOT to hold the entire government hostage.

The limit literally prevents US paying its debts, not enforce paying them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Fact check : True

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Without it, the bills aren’t paid.

How does limiting the amount of debts the Treasury can accrue on money already earmarked for spending pay anyone’s bills?

Imagine your spouse hands you a grocery list, you fill up your shopping cart, run it through the cash register, and get a total of $100.

Then you pull out your credit card, only to discover your spouse has also limited how much you can spend to $70.

How are you helped by this system?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How does limiting the amount of debts the Treasury can accrue on money already earmarked for spending pay anyone’s bills?

The simplest answer is to say that the money is earmarked for spending, but not payment. Think that Congress spends the money and Treasury pays for it. Some bills are due and payable this year, a year from now, 5 years from now, etc. Plus, income, or taxes raised, are also veriable.

In any case, the debt limit has to be raised in January and Trump is none too happy about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Why even have a debt limit to begin with? It’s a wholely artificial constraint?

You’ve earmarked $100 for spending, you don’t need a send legislative gate on the Treasury to spend it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Its a holdover from when the executive branch made the budgets so that congress still had some control. Long ago congress took back doing the budget with the congressional budget office and the debt limit makes no sense now as congress votes on the budget and then later votes on allowing bills they authorized to be paid with debt because they did not raise taxes to cover budget costs.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 217K

    Comments