He generally shows most of the signs of the misinformation accounts:

  • Wants to repeatedly tell basically the same narrative and nothing else
  • Narrative is fundamentally false
  • Not interested in any kind of conversation or in learning that what he’s posting is backwards from the values he claims to profess

I also suspect that it’s not a coincidence that this is happening just as the Elon Musks of the world are ramping up attacks on Wikipedia, specially because it is a force for truth in the world that’s less corruptible than a lot of the others, and tends to fight back legally if someone tries to interfere with the free speech or safety of its editors.

Anyway, YSK. I reported him as misinformation, but who knows if that will lead to any result.

Edit: Number of people real salty that I’m talking about this: Lots

46 points

Examples? Links?

permalink
report
reply
80 points
*

Lurking makes me think it’s

@wikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.world

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

The last thread OP participated in features a comment from OP countering something said about Wikipedia by wikipediasuckscoop. Looks like that’s who.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Thanks! Blocked em

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Doesn’t LW have a rule against desinformation and asking for reliable sources since the cat vegan food affair?

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

It only applies to misinformation that might cause significant harm to some organism, which doesn’t apply to this.

Personally, I don’t think that LW should make the attempt to police misinformation completely, since it’s sort of a judgement call a lot of the time. I think it’s better that people be able to argue out whether something is true or false, or intended disingenuously or not, all on their own without the mods needing to decide for them, because misinformation has such a big grey area that you can’t make an objective determination and be right about it 100% of the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Wow. Thanks for sharing that profile… that is dedication to the niche issue of smearing Wikipedia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Money makes the world go round

permalink
report
parent
reply
219 points

You just described the average Tankie around here lmao

permalink
report
reply
111 points

Yeah, there’s kind of a Poe’s Law situation.

A lot of the sincere tankies, though, at least want to talk about what they’re into, and have elaborate reasons why it’s all true. The low-effort “I can’t even be bothered to try to mount a defense, I just wanted to say Wikipedia is doxing its users and kowtowing to fascist governments, and now that I’ve said it my task is done” behavior is a little more indicative of a disingenuous propaganda account in my experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points
*

elaborate reasons why it’s all true

Usually it’s “just read these 10 hundred-year-old books” that they absolutely have not read.

And if you ask them to make a point from those books, they can’t. Apparently they’re only comprehensible as a whole.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

This is an excellent suggestion for how to deal with this. I can’t thank you enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s now poe’s law, it would be Occam’s razor.

The most likely scenario here is not many puppet accounts spreading sarcasm or parody but rather that there are many actors that all true believers in what they are all saying. They sound the same because they are feeding off the same talking point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You’re right, I was misremembering Poe’s law. We need a law for “there is no point of view so idiotic that someone won’t be out there passionately proclaiming it, not because they are a propaganda troll, but because they really believe it.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-38 points

Bro, why are you attacking people unrelated to the post’s topic?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Weird, seems like it’s completely related to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I am pretty convinced that .ml is legitimately used as a Russian troll training ground before they get promoted to Facebook and reddit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Meanwhile, at .ml:

Since Pi is infinite and non-repeating, would that mean any finite sequence of non-repeating numbers should appear somewhere in Pi?

permalink
report
parent
reply

@dx1 @socsa What about infinite sequences?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Even the most extreme extremist of echo chambers will have benign random conversations. Singling out a random blurb of conversation, without even any source link, is just cherry picking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s actually a really good way to illustrate what is wrong with lemmy.ml.

On math stack exchange:

Let me summarize the things that have been said which are true and add one more thing.

  1. 𝜋 is not known to have this property, but it is expected to be true.
  2. This property does not follow from the fact that the decimal expansion of 𝜋 is infinite and does not repeat.

On lemmy.ml:

0.101001000100001000001 . . .

I’m infinite and non-repeating. Can you find a 2 in me?

You can’t prove that there isn’t one somewhere

Why couldn’t you?

Because you’d need to search through an infinite number of digits (unless you have access to the original formula)

And:

Not just any all finite number sequence appear in pi

And:

Yes.

And if you’re thinking of a compression algorithm, nope, pigeonhole principle.

All heavily upvoted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*

Meanwhile actually at .ml: let’s deify a murderer because he killed somebody we don’t like and he’s fucking gorgeous. Nevermind that he’s a rich antiwoke Musk-lover, murder is cool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

This really could be any one of thousands of people on lemmy.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Honestly. Could be any user on any platform, Lemmy not excluded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This unactionable vaguepost is what suffices as a YSK?

Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK

Why should I know this, OP?

permalink
report
reply
32 points

I replied to the person directly with why it isn’t true, and I reported them with an actionable report.

I wasn’t sure about the ethics of brigading or linking directly at the person, but presumably anyone who cares can find them pretty easily, and anyone who reads this and then also reads the misinformation, will be able to see the connection and make their own decision about whether I am speaking truly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

anyone who cares can find them pretty easily

I care, I have found nothing similar to what you’re discussing.

anyone who reads this and then also reads the misinformation, will be able to see the connection

I just read a post that said Wikipedia was the best website on the internet, was that the misinformation? Someone else donated, was that misinformation? People have shared a variety of thoughts around Wikipedia, most of them are positive, but some are negative.

Negative doesn’t mean wrong. Negative doesn’t mean misinformation. It might be, but it isn’t certain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I just read a post that said Wikipedia was the best website on the internet, was that the misinformation?

No.

Someone else donated, was that misinformation?

No.

Wikipedia is only a source for truth for people that either don’t know what it’s protecting or are in the genocidal cult it is protecting.

And then I asked the person about this genocidal cult and got no response whatsoever, almost as if it was, not just a negative thing, but a wild and inaccurate thing said apparently with not even a little pretense that it corresponded to the truth. Was that misinformation? Yes!

Hope this helps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

You are asking weighted nuance from Lemmy. You might as well squish rocks to get water.

This post just reads as it could have been a mod report and that’s about it. Looks like outrage for the sake of outrage

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

True, this tells us nothing

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Oh hello mr Russian-pretending-to-be-American.

You’ve never answered why you pretend to be American while at the same time clearly supporting Russia and spreading Russian propaganda.

Are you such a weak-willed American you’ve bought into Russian propaganda?

Isn’t it annoying when you can’t just delete my comment and ban me like you alway do, mr Pro-Russian?

(This guys has said things like “reality has a well known Russian propaganda bias”.)

He’s pro-Russian, and will never answer that particular question despite being ready to lie about everything else, because he knows even a clear lie of “I hate Putin” written by him in the context of him being American could be reason enough for him to accidentally fall out of a window. Because Russia is a shithole autocracy.

This guy never states shit, goes around spamming wannabe good looking lists of links of shit that’s incredibly easily shown to be utter shit, but because there’s so much, it’ll always just diverge from the actual point.

It’s got a name.

An outgrowth of Soviet propaganda techniques, the firehose of falsehood is a contemporary model for Russian propaganda under Russian President Vladimir Putin.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firehose_of_falsehood

Spreading FUD everywhere.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty,_and_doubt

All you need to do to prove this is try to get him to answer whether he’s pro-Russian or not. Not a hard question, yet he just can’t manage answering it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean, you can say all of this stuff… or you could actually post links to evidence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Look at his profile.

Then look at my post.

Then look at the modlogs from the times on the screenshots of those posts.

It’s common knowledge lemmygrad.ml and lemmy.ml are complete tankies. D’you know why?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_disinformation

One of the easiest ways to spot Russians disinfo is when they pretend to be stupid to say that Russia doesn’t use disinfo, or that at least definitely not on Lemmy, no way.

And the exact same guys absolutely refuse to answer a simple yes or no question. Are you pro-Russian or not? Are you?

While claiming they’re American. Saying Russia is doing all the right things while criticising every Russian enemy and supporting China. Literally everything is in line with Russian propaganda. Yet they can’t say whether they’re pro-Russian or not. While clearly being pro-Russian, and adamantly claiming to be American?

That isn’t enough for you to figure it out? Alrighty then, let’s do it the way he does; just spam the ever living fuck out of anything tangentially related.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/D8A8A74976408CF7EC329827AFFFD3FC/S0003055421001507a.pdf/div-class-title-why-botter-how-pro-government-bots-fight-opposition-in-russia-div.pdf

https://en.zois-berlin.de/publications/russian-state-sponsored-media-and-disinformation-on-twitter

That 404’s, but it’s on the wayback machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210916150314/https://en.zois-berlin.de/publications/russian-state-sponsored-media-and-disinformation-on-twitter

In particular, it needs to be established what messages are spread on social media platforms and under what conditions, and whether disinformation is shared more widely than objective reporting. Likewise, future research should consider investigating the effects of disinformation spread by RT and Sputnik on social media platforms.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_disinformation

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation_in_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine

https://www.bmi.bund.de/SharedDocs/schwerpunkte/EN/disinformation/examples-of-russian-disinformation-and-the-facts.html

https://www.state.gov/russias-pillars-of-disinformation-and-propaganda-report/

What’s your theory? That he’s an America hating American who loves Russia, hates facts and has made it his life mission to emulate Russian propaganda, but is still too ashamed of it to take a stance on whether he’s pro-Russian or not? And that sounds probable to you…?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The person claiming every piece of negative information about russia and china and other similar places is a usa psyop is now quoting rules against a post trying to make people aware of misinformation?! Color me surprised.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-80 points

This seems like an attempt at vote manipulation or brigading. Reddit doesn’t allow it, is it allowed here or something?

Wikipedia is only a source for truth for people that either don’t know what it’s protecting or are in the genocidal cult it is protecting.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

are in the genocidal cult it is protecting

I’m fascinated. Explain?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

The person you’re responding to has their own crazy agenda against Linux, so don’t expect a rational discussion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They also found time to say, “Both sides of US politics are full of shit and balance each other out to distract us from our real problems.”

What a perfectly natural thing to say, in conjunction with suddenly hating on Wikipedia right at this particular moment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I mean Linux is fucking annoying or rather the users are annoying. Everytime the word windows gets mentioned there are dozens of people talking about Linux even if that has nothing to do with the topic

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

Oh yeah Op was really trying to get people to go and downvote a user without even telling us who they are…

I’m not even going to touch the insane nonsense you spouted in the second half.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It just so happens that they picked things to accuse me of, for no reason at all, which overlap with things I could get banned for.

Must be a coincidence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

A single issue spam account (Linux sucks is all they post) acting dodgy?

I can’t believe that they would ever try something so underhanded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I guess you’re the person OP is talking about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What cult? And what is Wikipedia protecting?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Why don’t you post some of your weird Linux trolling outside your sad little echo chamber?

Lol you will get roasted even worse than here, is the answer. Some people have the saddest lives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

You know what an echo chamber is and ask that question. lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Aw poor little baby mad about Linux made a he-man Linux haters club. Sad no one will join it 😭

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Honestly hilarious that this is the only reply you responded to. Hit a nerve?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’m in like 5 genocidal cults at this particular moment. You’ll need to be more specific.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You Should Know

!youshouldknow@lemmy.world

Create post

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you’re a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post’s text body, you must include the reason “Why” YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That’s it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.

Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

Community stats

  • 3.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 204

    Posts

  • 3.9K

    Comments