46 points

Ketamine pot, calling the mentally ill kettle black.

permalink
report
reply
90 points

I cannot explain how disgustingly evil it is to witness the suffering of individuals, whether due to substance abuse, illness, or homelessness, and dismiss it as untruthful.

The numbers to fix homelessness may be controversial, with some sites saying it was 20 billion in 2010 and that’s just to provide vouchers for a year, and some fact checking sites saying it can cost $60 billion in a year.

The primary concern is the actions of a South African billionaire, whose net worth is $350 billion. Instead of recognizing the complexities of a significant social issue, he appears to dehumanize those affected and assigns blame, rather than offering assistance.

What a fucking evil take.

permalink
report
reply
-4 points
*

Those numbers all take into account existing housing assistance programs, which are used by mostly non-homeless people.

There are 250k homeless people in the US. For $20B, you could spend $80k per each person. Since many of the homeless are families, that’s enough to buy a small house for each family.

But you still have to keep paying into the existing programs, or more people will become homeless. Compared to a quarter million homeless people, there are 4.5M households using the existing programs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

While the word is “homeless” the problem is generally not just “lacking a home”. It usually stems from things like inability to work due to severe disability or psychiatric illness, unofficial immigrants struggling to find employment, addiction, abandonment from family, not enough money to retire but unable to work etc.

Like don’t get me wrong giving everyone a home is great. But it won’t magically solve all the problems. And they might not be able to afford maintinance, property tax etc. Also if it’s homelessness due to lack of employment I question whether the 80k home will be anywhere useful for someone to find a job they qualify for, and if it will have any transportation links or anything

permalink
report
parent
reply
174 points
*

Even if that is true, does it somehow invalidate the fact that they are also homeless?! Are they less deserving to be out of the elements because they have an addiction?

That’s what I find so disgusting about this statement. It’s just an excuse and doesn’t address anything at all.

Using his own “argument”, it would seem to me that a path to less addiction and violence would involve having a place to live and sleep.

permalink
report
reply
77 points
*

Lots of people feel this way about homelessness and addiction. It’s very easy to dehumanized people. My cousin interrupted me, when I said something about it, and told me “when you have people shooting up outside your house, then you can complain”. As if i couldnt have an opinion until i experience the issue that is homelessness, the war on drugs, and our failure to address mental health issues in this country with my very own eyes. She’s a bit snooty, and she doesn’t even realize it.

Nevermind that once you become homeless, it becomes much harder to dig yourself out of that hole (probably by design).

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

It’s such a self-centered point of view. They can’t even conceive of themselves ever being in a similar situation so they assume the person inconveniencing them must be fully to blame for their homelessness. Then they can ignore those degenerates without feeling guilty about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If you are homeless, it’s because supply side Jesus doesn’t love you, obviously

permalink
report
parent
reply
-39 points

Are they less deserving to be out of the elements because they have an addiction?

That’s not what’s being said. He is criticizing the fact that so many people assume that ‘just give them a place to live’ is the solution, when it’s much, much more complicated than that. In that way, “homeless” is very reductive, and masks those other issues, in favor of making it look like it’s a simple problem with a simple solution.

Very few long-term homeless people are homeless simply because they can’t afford a place to live.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

So we shouldn’t house them unless and until we figure out all of the complex issues? They’re not going to benefit any at all, or have any possibility of getting on their feet, until we have a perfect solution?

That’s what’s being said there: homelessness is not something we should do anything about, because of reasons. So let’s do nothing.

That’s a fucking cop out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-45 points

So we shouldn’t house them unless and until we figure out all of the complex issues?

That’s what’s being said there: homelessness is not something we should do anything about

No, Cathy, that’s not what was said.

The fact of the matter is that we know what happens when we provide shelter without anything else. It doesn’t last and you’re right back where you started before you know it. After all, it’s that stuff that is the reason they became homeless in the first place.

If you don’t address the other stuff, ‘just give them a house lol’ literally doesn’t work long-term. That’s the reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Homelessness encompasses far more than rough sleeping. I agree that there are issues that many homeless people may face that wouldn’t be resolved just by giving them a roof over their head. But it’d be a great start. And don’t forget, a lot of homelessness is people and families in temporary or crisis housing, or couch surfing with friends and family, because they can’t afford a place of their own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

I wouldn’t say this contradicts anything I said, really. I don’t disagree with any of this.

I bristled specifically at the ridiculously glib and reductive “solve homelessness” line. People love to think issues like these are things that have simple obvious solutions that no one thought of before their enlightenment came along and deigned to bless the rest of us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Giving them a house is the shortest route to address all the other problems. But no, let’s a Neo-Nazi junkie address the issue of deviance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Yeah wonder what could drive someone to addiction and desperation? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm couldn’t be not having a stable food supply and a place to live?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Yeah the whole correlation causation thing is going to be very mixed up here. Like lets look at it another way:

Oh no I become disabled > Can’t work anymore shit I got no money > Try to apply for disability benefits oh fuck its a million forms and I need a lawyer oh fuck I’m broke > Crash at friends to apply for disability, first try fails after 1 year (this is pretty standard usually takes 2-3 trys), oh fuck friend kicks me out > go to homeless camp struggling to feed yourself, no time to think about applying for benefits anymore > The pain is too much I don’t have my medicine anymore its fucking freezing oh shit that guys selling drugs > get addicted

Boom, you’re homeless and addicted. That story could happen to literally anyone without generational wealth and an exceptionally strong support network.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Wait, I can’t tell, is Elon talking about himself?

permalink
report
reply
15 points

By his own definition, he is homeless, yeah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Completely ignoring that addiction is an illness.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Doesn’t matter. We have the resources available to house, feed, educate, provide health care, and community for every American but don’t out of greed. The US won’t survive unless we mobilize every American to achieve their best self.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Enough Musk Spam

!enoughmuskspam@lemmy.world

Create post

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

Community stats

  • 4.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 247

    Posts

  • 1.8K

    Comments