Summary

In North Carolina, Republican lawmakers passed legislation stripping powers from newly elected Democratic officials, including limiting the governor’s authority over elections and judicial appointments.

Critics, including Democratic leaders and advocacy groups, label the moves a “power grab” undermining democracy, citing rushed processes and lack of public input.

Republicans defend the changes as balancing state government. Protesters and lawsuits have emerged in response, while gerrymandering and contested elections fuel broader concerns about democratic erosion.

The controversy reflects wider trends in U.S. state politics targeting checks on majority party power.

12 points

So, more or less what they did in Wisconsin when Walker lost.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Looks like North Carolina could use a political luiging.

Edit: I mean arresting all the republicans in office and charging them with terrorism. Yeah, let’s go with that.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

This exact thing happened after reconstruction to prevent black political power. And it worked.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Honorable Republican? I haven’t heard a more oxymoronic statement since “military intelligence”.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

Turns out people are willing to abandon democracy before abandoning their belief system. I guess telling everyone else what to believe is more important than just leaving people the fuck alone. I know, it’s a big ask to let people just live their life.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Democracy is a “belief system”.

It’s status as the default and unquestioned ideology is one of the reasons that it’s vulnerable. The West has tolerated weak and incompetent democracies that bow to capital and are useless to help regular people. Why is everyone shocked when people conclude that it just doesn’t work?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 212K

    Comments