Summary

Donald Trump has sued pollster J. Ann Selzer and The Des Moines Register over a pre-election poll showing Kamala Harris leading in Iowa by three points, claiming it created a “false narrative of inevitability.”

Trump, who won the state by 13 points, alleges election interference but provides no evidence of wrongdoing.

Legal experts expect the case to fail, citing First Amendment protections. Critics argue the lawsuit is intended to burden media outlets financially.

Selzer has retired, and Gannett, the newspaper’s parent company, has defended the poll’s methodology as sound.

4 points

The DmR is such a weird target. It may be in a blue city but it panders to the red state. It spends most of its time sucking off the far right policies of iowa politicians and normalizing the tiny dicked, serial sex pest’s insane behavior.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

He’s only choosing the DmR because Selzer is one of the most famous pollsters with one of the most accurate track records in the history of political prediction- and very widely regarded as such. He needs to make an example out of any resistance there might be to his upcoming reign, as well as use this as proof that the previous election was “manipulated” as justification for future election “”“reforms”“”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

What a childish sore winner. Contrary to popular belief polls don’t predict results, they represent a fleeting moment in time. Now fuck off, you won.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Trump is mad the poll made him worry he might not be elected like Putin promises.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

trump is a weak, pathetic idiot. I hope he sues me too.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Only Trump is allowed to say and do whatever the hell he wants with impunity.

permalink
report
reply
-21 points

I do hate Trump, but and bear with me here but maybe there’s actually some good that can come out of that. Maybe we’ll get more accurate polls. Maybe we’ll get a better understanding where people are actually at.

One can only hope.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

What?? How the hell is that related?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

The dipshit in orange is suing about a poll that (he claims) wasn’t accurate.

How is having more accurate polls not related?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

So then explain how that leads to more accurate polls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Jesus Christ man, you want to throw out the first amendment over a bad poll? Seriously?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

A little reading and comprehension goes a long way.

Where did I say I want to throw anything out? Where did I say I like this lawsuit? Where did I even imply that I want this lawsuit to continue?

The only thing I said was maybe something good can come of it. It’s called a thin silver lining.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Headline: Trump sues pollster

You: This could be good, maybe we’ll get better polls.

What did I miss?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

This isn’t about polling, it’s extortion, he’s trying to get money. He’s going to keep doing this for the money

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

You know that. I know that.

It’s called a small silver lining.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

This lawsuit is strong arming for sure but you have a valid point.

As much as everything that Trump does sucks, if he ends up putting stricter regulations on news media against reporting unfounded claims, it’s going to be good in the long term. I can’t wait for the day that Fox News finds itself needing to report facts.

The balancing act will be accurate reporting vs the fear of reporting anything negative against a public figure. The latter will be a death blow to democracy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

if he ends up putting stricter regulations on news media against reporting unfounded claims, it’s going to be good in the long term.

🤦‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

A face palm. How is it bad to tell media to report facts and not spread misinformation like they did to support Trump during his initial election? There were people literally asking the government to do something to stop the spread of misinformation (it was people on the left asking for that).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 197K

    Comments