8 points
*

Because yes, “the left” never changes anything, and only goes further right.

(hint: That’s not how this works)

Over the decades we’ve made massive strides in equal rights for various marginalized groups. But sometimes the dance takes a step backwards before moving forward again.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Homie, the Democraes right now are pretty much as much on the political right as the republicans were in the 90s.

Smugly claiming “that’s not how this works” isn’t as good a point as you think it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

In an American vacuum I could see where you are coming from. In comparison with literally the entire rest of the world, it is clearly a flawed standpoint.

The American Democratic party is the oldest standing political party in the entire world. It last changed it’s political stances in the 1960’s and not because they wanted to, but because they needed to respond to the Republicans flipping the entire south in their favor.

Other countries have real leftist parties that actually get government members elected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

More like the Overton Window at work actually.

Biden will likely end up as one of the top 5 most progressive presidents ever. Society expects more from Democrats than they would’ve previously. There’s nothing wrong w/ that, but the argument being presented seems misguided and like both sides nihilism.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Biden will likely end up as one of the top 5 most progressive presidents ever.

Biden will be remembered as the president with dementia who butchered Gaza.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

exactly. i thought Biden was the shit until Gaza. now, I dont even care about him at all. he’s just another politician.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

That’s unfair, he’ll also be remembered for supporting segregation

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That’s unfair, he’ll also be remembered for supporting the electoral college

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Biden will likely end up as one of the top 5 most progressive presidents ever.

He’s not even in the top 5 now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
91 points

Ah yes, so the best option is to not vote and let them succeed unimpeded.

I’m all for voting for a better candidate, but we have a broken 2 party system, and it very much is if you don’t vote for one of the two main parties, you are pretty much just not voting at all.

I don’t vote for this person. I’m voting against that person.

permalink
report
reply
32 points
*

Dems have been nothing but a doormat for the last 30 years, the party of complicity. I’m absolutely positive they’ve been playing the dupe and moving the US further to the right all the while playing the victim.

Could have fixed the electoral college but didn’t. Could have codified abortion into the constitution but didn’t. Could have filled RBGs supreme court seat without Senate confirmation regardless of the pearl clutching, but didn’t. Could have put pressure on the justice department to get their investigation done with to get the trial for Trump for treason at least started…but fuck me, they didn’t… seriously- they couldn’t put a case together in 3 years???

Could have, should have, would have. Fucking useless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I agree, but also stand by my point. In a horrible 2 party system, they’re simply “not conservative”, and so I’m forced to vote for them. That being said, Bernie should have won.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Bernie got railroaded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They are conservative though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

In my country we stopped voting the socdem party, because they betrayed the workers. From one election to the next they lost like half the votes.

For 4 years the conservative party ruled. But after that the socdem change their politics we voted them again and had had a fairly leftist government for the last year.

They are slacking again so I plan not to vote next election, hoping thar more people get the memo, they sink again in votes and sit to think on why people felt betrayed, and change for the better.

4 years of conservative party were worthy giving that after the socdems turned left again we conquer a lot of things that we wouldn’t have gotten otherwise if we would have keep on voting their moderate centrist version.

We also voted for third parties when they said that it was throwing your vote away, and the other party got almost the same votes as the socdems(too bad they were not that good once they sat on office). My point is that courage is needed to make a change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

In the US the ruling party fills lifetime judicial appointments, which means the 4 years of conservative rule can have decades of lasting impact that will thwart any progressive policies that the next leftish government tries to implement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

You can get around the courts. FDR did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Then they better fucking learn quick, huh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ah yes, so the best option is to not vote and let them succeed unimpeded.

The best option is to scream at anyone who isn’t fucking delighted that your side of the party has moved so far to the right that they’re supporting genocide.

No one can gripe about your shit wing of the party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

OK, what else do you suggest? Not voting? That just speeds the process up. Voting for the small but much better option? In a FPTP voting system (like the American one that I assume you’re talking about), the spoiler effect means that’s as good as not voting.

This is my issue with the leftist community in general, and especially the ml group. Because of idealism, they seem to ask for something that doesn’t exist and not accept anything else.

permalink
report
reply
9 points
14 points

As good as that video is, he ignores the strength elections have as damage control. Yes, large positive change needs the sort of efforts he’s describing, but ignoring voting means a bad government will have far more opportunity to undo progress.

Really, the biggest takeaway from that video is that there are more tools than simply voting and protesting, which I don’t think anyone is disagreeing with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I don’t think you got the main point of the video. Not only “large” change needs these efforts. Any progressive change does. As soon as there is no pressure by mass movements, politicians will drift to strengthen their power, which means moving to the right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

As good as that video is, he ignores the strength elections have as damage control.

Was supporting genocide “damage control?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

OK, what else do you suggest?

Not many ask.

Because of idealism, they seem to ask for something that doesn’t exist and not accept anything else.

This is my issue with almost everyone. They believe they already know what others think, that no one could possibly have an alternative that they’ve not already considered.

My suggestions are as follows: Consider that your scope of evaluation is only one cycle. As a consequence there may be nuance in system function that you’d not considered. Then ask the same question but in good faith.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Do you simply have no answer, or are you withholding them so you can feel smug?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Do you simply have no answer, or are you withholding them so you can feel smug?

false dichotomy

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

not many ask

Yes, they do ask a lot, at least a far as I’ve seen. I still haven’t seen a good alternative to voting for the lesser evil in a FPTP system.

They believe they already know what others think

My opinion on that was based on the whole “don’t vote for Harris, she’ll support genocide” thing I saw earlier this year. If I’m wrong about that, or anything else, I’m more than happy to be corrected.

no one could possibly have an alternative that they’ve not already considered

Most people don’t think that no one could have a good alternative, they just don’t know of anyone who does.

your scope of evaluation is only one cycle

You’re assuming that’s my only scope. Both the short term and the long term are important, but from what I’ve seen the short term tends to get ignored in this sort of community.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

OK, what else do you suggest?

I suggest that the party take the fucking hint and move to the left. But that’s not an option you will consider.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That’s absolutely an option I would consider, but it’s not an option that 99% of people can actually act on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well, shouting at the electorate to shut up and love genocide because it’s the “lesser” evil didn’t work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I think you’re missing several things. First, if the phenomenon is accurate, and it is, then the burden is on you to figure out how to stop getting played. Don’t ask other people to solve your problems. Recognize your problems, and then work to solve them directly.

Second, the spoiler effect doesn’t exist unless you’re in a swing state. But how many Americans were told that they have to vote for Harris or they’re supporting Trump, when in fact their state was nowhere close to 50/50 so realistically they could have voted for anyone?

Third, there is no single leftist community. There are many different leftist communities that overlap and agree on various points. Also, you’re suggesting that leftists are idealist, but that’s not the truth. We all recognize the current situation, and we’re trying to make a better one, but you’re not. In other words, your cynicism has caused you to throw in the towel, and to accept the current reality as permanent, unchangeable, it sucks but there’s nothing you can do, and that’s certainly true if you believe it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

then the burden is on you to figure out how to stop getting played. Don’t ask other people to solve your problems

Sorry, but how the fuck did you get to that opinion? Sharing knowledge and ideas is how humanity thrives, but unless I’m misunderstanding you you’re saying that we should each individually find a solution to the problem we are all in together.

the spoiler effect doesn’t exist unless you’re in a swing state

The spoiler effect will always exist to some extent in any FPTP system. Sure, it won’t make nearly as much difference in a one sided state as it will in a swing state, but the effect still exists, and makes it much harder for a better party to gain traction while not losing a lot of ground in the mean time.

how many Americans were told that they have to vote for Harris or they’re supporting Trump

The people that didn’t believe this and so didn’t vote are probably the reason that Trump won the popular vote, and that the republicans have a majority in the senate and the house.

you’re suggesting that leftists are idealist, but that’s not the truth

Acting like “voting for the lesser evil is evil and therefore unacceptable” seems pretty idealist to me. I’m well aware that most people here are aware of how shit the world is, and are doing their part to improve it, which is something I appreciate and want to support. It’s just that from what I can tell, the recent US election was the wrong place for idealism.

we’re trying to make a better one, but you’re not

Sorry, mate, but don’t assume. I’m not american, I’m kiwi. And since we don’t have a completely shit voting system, I always vote as a huge idealist and never vote for one of the big two, because in MMP that’s not a wasted vote.

your cynicism has caused you to throw in the towel, and to accept the current reality as permanent, unchangeable

No. I’ve just accepted that, at least for this cycle of US elections, the better approach would be playing defensive. It’s not that the current reality is unchangeable, it’s that positive change will be very slow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

do you mean of not voting for them?

people don’t vote, democrats lose, they think it’s because they’re too far left and move further to the right. meanwhile republican victories embolden them to push even harder into fascism

permalink
report
reply
12 points

I’m not an American but I would argue that Biden’s resignation was in part due to people threatening to not vote. This wasn’t a move to the left but organized threats of not voting can make a difference.

Personally, I would vote for the lesser evil unless there was some kind of organized movement. Where I live, we have more than 2 evils to choose from and I choose the smallest of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Biden was incapable of clearly communicating verbally for 2 hours straight in a debate. I’d argue that Biden stayed in as long as he did to enable them to feel empowered to force another Kamala on us rather than having to deal with a Warren, Sanders or even a Buttigieg winning the Primary. Kamala was 6th in line in the Primary when she dropped out in 2020.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Good point

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I vote for them, they move right. I don’t vote for them, and vote third party, they move right. I join their party and vote in their primary’s for progressive candidates, they move right.

It’s almost like a bunch of really old, well off, lifetime establishment government folks just actually want to be conservative authoritarians. At BEST they are stuck in a mindset of 1969’s ideas of what progressive politics are because that is when they became politicians.

permalink
report
parent
reply

They’ve obviously lost the thread and who could blame them? They’ve been locked up with conservatives for 50+ years. That would be enough to have me blow my brains out.

The point is the whole DNC is a rotten corpse. Maybe at one time the candidates had an ideology but now they’ve fought every fight they’re willing to fight and just want to be old and not bothered. Except they don’t want to give up their power. Which is frightening. From their perspective they’ve only made it this far by clenching tight to power for as long as they could and can’t imagine a world where they just live at harmony with people around them. They lose all their clout. No one needs them anymore and they rot to nothing. That’s the fear at least.

Everyday I’m more convinced the thing that got us where we are is American hyper competitive mentality. We have to work endlessly. We have to score the best grades. We have to make the most money.

Why can’t we just take pride in living peacefully. This is what all the Trumpers are upset about, honestly. They want to be able to live in their podunk town. Doing their unimportant job. Liking the same things their mommy and daddy liked and be unbothered. Culturally that’s fucked and we’ve seen why but idealistically it’s fine. We need unimportant people to do unimportant things and be more or less just like the ones who came before. So why not reward it?

I’m rambling.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

people don’t vote, democrats lose, they think it’s because they’re too far left and move further to the right.

People vote, Democrats win, they think it’s because they moved to the right and so they move further to the right. The sun comes up in the morning and they move further to the right.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 9K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.5K

    Posts

  • 48K

    Comments