14 points

The firm launched this project after European publishers demanded more information about the traffic brought to their websites by Google search as part of the implementation of the EU Copyright Directive.

For the full context:

  • Publishers want to force Google to pay them for “copying” their news into the search engine.
  • Google claims publishers would die of starvation without Google.
  • In countries where such forced royalties were implemented, Google simply delisted everyone… until publishers came back crying about lost visits.
permalink
report
reply
5 points

If I’m understanding correctly, that sounds like what Canada did recently and Google did eventually come to an agreement with the government

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Canada, Australia, Germany, Denmark… Same thing happened in Spain in 2014 already:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Newspaper_Publishers'_Association

Google cut out all Spanish news sources in 2014, until they came back crying in 2022:

https://thefix.media/2023/8/31/google-news-in-spain-the-legacy-of-its-shutdown-and-the-impact-of-its-reopening

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

And nothing of that has anything to do with blocking the union’s website besides Google’s sheer incompetence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

First, they have a news section, making them a publisher:

https://journalistforbundet.dk/nyheder

Second, the union is:

for people who work in journalism, media and communications

https://journalistforbundet.dk/dj-english

That also includes publishers.

Google did what they were asked for. With malicious compliance, but what they were asked for. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes 🤷

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

That’s not at all evil. /s

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Publishers are the evil ones here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Hardly. The lesser evil perhaps, but in any context that includes Google there’s never a doubt who’s actually the bigger culprit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In this case, it includes anyone referencing any publications. Like this post right here.

If publishers had their way, then lemmy.ml, and kbin, and you, and me, and all the instances on the Fediverse making an “unauthorized copy” of any part of the content, would have to pay.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments