There is no evidence this is an official donation fund

10 points

That’s it??

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*

The article is from yesterday, and slightly updated.

It looks like it’s now up to $83k

For how hard fundraising for Luigi has been suppressed, I’m shocked it even got this far at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I feel like it could be at $100M overnight with the right advertising…

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The trial hasn’t even been scheduled as far as I’m aware. By the time it rolls around that fund is going to be much bigger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I never heard of that place before and I hope a lot of people were not too knee-jerk about it. It wasn’t like, “official” in any sense that I could see.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

He 100% needs a better lawyer…

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=U0Jav3T2K00

The one he has now is probably just the only lawyer in Altoona.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

Really? Dude seems like a pro to me.

He has 30+ years of criminal defense experience, and clearly has some media training (which let’s face it, that’s going to be critical in this case in particular).

The guy has even successfully appealed the PA supreme court. What more are you looking for in a defense lawyer, exactly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Yeah from that video and the one later he seems to know his stuff. Using “put yourself in Luigi’s position” is the perfect answer to avoid leaking sensitive info about your discussions with your client that the media are constantly prodding for, while still evoking sympathy for the defendant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

and clearly has some media training

I admit I haven’t watched the entire press conference…

But I think our standards have been drastically lowered by the last election if the dude in that video qualifies as “clearly having some media training”.

I found this

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/who-is-thomas-dickey-lawyer-decries-lack-of-evidence-tying-luigi-mangione-to-ceo-shooting/ar-AA1vGIKg

But it’s like I said, he’s a small time lawyer.

The most noteworthy case in that article was a robbery turned double murder where the defendant is clearly guilty. I didn’t see anything about appealing the PA SC, but whether or not that’s impressive is highly dependent on the exact case. And it’s not as rare as you seem to think it is.

I’m not saying he’s a bad lawyer.

Just that he’s not the caliber lawyer Luigi needs when the full force of the government is going to come down on him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

He needs an entire legal team.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

He seems like a pretty good lawyer to me. A lot of non-answers. No speculation or sensationalism. He’s controlling the conversation rather than letting the reporters derail it. Any particular reason you think he’s bad?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Well, first off the murder charges are NY and this guy’s has only practiced in PA, so it’s a safe assumption he hasn’t passed the NY bar…

There’s other reasons, but the fact that this guy literally can only fight the extradition and gun charges.

I feel like it’s a safe bet that Luigi will need another lawyer

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Yeah for sure they’ll bring on another lawyer that’s accredited in New York once needed, but that doesn’t mean this lawyer is a bad one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

He will 100% need a new lawyer, probably an entire team to be honest. And his public defender can help with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Idk, joking around and feeling relatable are pretty good strategies for making a jury feel more sympathetic to the defense. And as other people have said with how high profile this case being calm and good on camera is important. So far I’ve thought he seemed great.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Also, there’s basically no chance he successfully blocks extradition. This is just a delaying action to have more time as a story. Being able to handle media well is probably his primary requirement.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Wow some of those reporters are in for blood.

Also: Saul Goodman vibes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Saul Goodman vibes.

Exactly

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

why does he need a defense fund? He’s going to be defended either way.

if they convict him, which they probably will based on DNA and overwhelming evidence, and send him to jail. would he need to pay his lawyers back for their time?

permalink
report
reply
10 points

They might be able to prove in court he’s guilty. Convicting is a different story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

A team of lawyers is going to be much better for him than a single public defender ever can do.

As of right now we have no solid understanding of what evidence there is against him, because the cops could be saying anything they like.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

It must be nice to have so much money and privilege that you can afford a team of lawyers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He doesn’t have a public defender. His attorney is not a public defender.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Did he give a sperm sample or something at the crime seen? What DNA?

And public defenders though they are as skilled as any attorney are very much overworked in many places. Private counsel can offer more attention to the details of a case and spend time researching potentially novel theories to defend their client.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

They can sample DNA now if you’ve simply been in the area. They can sample it off the backpack he discarded in the park. They can sample it off the shell casings. They have his movement across many cameras.

Remember, they only have to prove “beyond a reasonable doubt”.

I think lemmy users need to get their head out of their asses with the “we really don’t know if he did it” thing. As much as anyone might think the crime was justified, the evidence is pretty solid. And with such an emotional newsworthy case, they’re not going to bring it to trial unless the evidence is beyond reproach.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They also said they have fingerprints from a water bottle. If that’s true, they can probably get DNA from that. If they actually need DNA.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What do you think DNA is? The thing outside a criminals’s gloves? IRL isn’t CSI Miami. Go swap a NYC sidewalk and see what you get. That’d be a needle in a haystack.

Remember, they only have to prove “beyond a reasonable doubt”.

This is like saying remember marathon runners only need to run 26.2 miles.

It’s not having our “head [in our] asses” it’s a decent respect for the freestanding system of laws. Social media vilianizing or martyrizing people alleged of cromes isn’t beneficial for true justice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

In the US, you need to pay a lot of money to not be found guilty

permalink
report
parent
reply
85 points

The thing holding back these donation funds is verification that they’re actually for Mangione’s defense. “The December 4th Legal Committee” could just be a scam.

permalink
report
reply
60 points

Yeah, I’m holding off on donations until his public defender gives an official place to donate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

He is a hired attorney.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points
*

I’ve never heard of “GiveSendGo”, and who is d4legalcomm@gmail.com (the email address listed on the GiveSendGo page)? The fact that it’s some random Gmail is kinda sketchy. Are we sure this is legit?

permalink
report
reply
25 points

It’s probably not legit, which is why I’m holding off until his public defender gives official information about any potential donations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

If it’s probably not legit, why did you post it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Because the fact that this knock off gofundme exploded so quick is itself news.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Wikipedia explains who they are very well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GiveSendGo

GiveSendGo is a Christian crowdfunding website.[5] GiveSendGo has attracted controversy for allowing far-right extremists to fundraise, including neo-Nazis, white supremacists and hate groups.[15]

They have also had multiple security breaches.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yikes

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

PayPal suspended payments to GiveSendGo because it was raising funds for people who had participated in the 2021 United States Capitol attack

oh… oh no.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Unfortunately probably the only such site that might host such a fundraiser

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I get what you mean there. I hope they have improved their security since then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No. In an interview the attorney seemed to not be interested in accepting donations.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 207K

    Comments