74 points

This has similar energy to “you’re not in traffic, you are traffic”.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I really pissed off a coworker with this line. Complains about 1.5 hour commute because of “all the assholes in rush hour”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

What a double crossed world :)

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I mean, kinda yeah, but also deer are royally fucking retarded and would totally stand in the middle of the ocean if it meant getting in the way

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

People are weak for needing cars.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

True, it’s retarded we need so many cars. But they also literally connect the world, and if used correctly, help us see new things and understand the world better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

This comment was reported for the use of the word “retard”. Watch the language if you please. Having grown up in the 90s, I get that the word is part of an older lexicon, but it doesn’t make it any more socially acceptable

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There’s no correct way to use cars. We need zero emissions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes, but how is that relevant to the comment you replied to?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

What a ridiculous statement. Haha. What community did I stumble into?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Non-American

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

You’re completely right. Many other animals understand the concept of roads and will leave them when a car approaches, as long as you don’t surprise them before they have the chance. Foxes for example.

Deers however will cross a road when a car approaches, and sometimes even change their mind and cross the road a second time in the other direction.

But deer are a pest in most areas anyways, so they are better off dead. Just a shame for the damage done to the car

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

What’s funny about humans is we are more than happy to eat intelligent animals like pigs, but for the most part won’t put forth the effort needed to eat deer which are dumb as rocks. Very sad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

People don’t eat deer as commonly as beef but they do it it. Never had of venison and game meat?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

I think the reason that deer seem “retarded” in their response to cars is that for their entire evolutionary history there has never been an animal that would hurtle through both the day and night at improbable speeds almost completely silently. No land predator has previously evolved to blind its prey with large powerful sets of lights at night.

Counterintuitively, in my opinion deer seem to so often chaotically run out in front of cars (and growing up somewhere with lots of deer I know how incredibly infuriating and scary this can be) because it is actually the most sensible survival strategy for being ambushed by a fast moving predator with a lot of inertia that may or may not realize they have stumbled upon a meal.

Imagine you weren’t a pathetic, slow human being and could outrun most predators, now imagine chilling inside a bush when you see a a grizzly bear sprinting at 40mph almmmossst but not quite straight at you.

Your impulse is to freeze and then wait for the right moment to bolt, especially because the predator hasn’t seen you yet and likely just caught your scent or is running at something else. However, this predator is scentless, nearly silent and at night blinds you so that the distance they are away from you is very difficult to determine (the opposite of a grizzly bear really), so the right moment to bolt is hard to judge.

At the last second you realize the “grizzly bear” is almost upon you and you panic because it is happening so fast and fall back on your instincts. Your instincts, as a prey animal that can run faster and for longer than predators, are the same as any human who has ever played a sport where they need to rush past a defender… and you erratically cut across the bear’s path of motion after you think it has committed to rushing directly at you. The idea is to hopefully catch the bear with its weight shift committed in the wrong direction so you get just a tinnyyyy bit more of a head start in the chase. In otherwords the deer’s instinct is to try to “juke” the fast moving predator with fancy footwork.

Please see the scientific illustration I have provided, notice that the bear’s path (red) has to switch directions whereas if the deer had decided to just directly run away from their bear the bear wouldn’t have needed to switch directions/accelerate twice, just make a slight turn to reorient itself into an opportunistic chase with the deer.

This doesn’t work on cars, especially because if at first a deer doesn’t succeed at getting the timing right they are dead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think your probably right on all counts (supported by the highly scientific diagram, 10/10), but also deer are just really stupid, which I can say from having lived in their habitat half my life lol. I think it’s mostly likely that intelligence was just never evolutionarily very useful to deer, it almost never is as it takes a lot of energy and doesn’t generally support reproduction. The strategy deer have adopted seems to involve shitting out a bunch of babies each year and hope for the best. Which works great when the best isn’t 2-5 tons of metal with a bunch of kinetic energy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

You are making a basic framing error here which has been deeply ingrained into us as a narrative justification for hyper individualism and late stage capitalism, prey aren’t at war with predators.

Ever watch a whitetail deer spook and dash away into the underbrush? They flip their tail up to expose a bright white target on their rump.

Why?

Because predators overwhelming target sick and vulnerable prey, predators stabilize prey population swings and keep them from catastrophically exploding. Prey in turn sustain predators.

Whitetail deer display the signal to demonstrate they are healthy. I wouldn’t call it symbiosis, but I also think it is a serious categorical error to conceptualize it as an existential war or arms race. If whitetail deer suddenly evolved to become so fast predators could never catch them even if they counter-evolved to be a bit faster it would either lead to extinction of deer or the extinction of deer and the ecosystems around them, those are the only to possible end states neither of which is good for deer.

The reason I am saying this is that unlike predators, cars have no consistent genetic forcing on deer, car deerkills are essentially random and thus only function to lower the signal-to-noise ratio on other genetic forcings that continously shape deer into well adapted positive contributors to the ecosystems around them. How can you expect a species to adapt to a process of violence that is so chaotic and disconnected from the surrounding ecosystem that it is evolutionarily invisible except as a force of degradation?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
6 points

I really like this one

permalink
report
reply

solarpunk memes

!memes@slrpnk.net

Create post

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a “meme” here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server’s ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators’ discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

Community stats

  • 4.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 428

    Posts

  • 6.2K

    Comments