73 points

Showed this information to my boomer mother who then asked my also tech illiterate step father what he thought.

“We don’t send sensitive information through texts.”

The ignorance almost physically hurts… Thinking that only the actual message content is important.

Or ignoring the pictures we send and the private things I talk about with my mom.

Do I think that specifically my information would be useful to China? Likely not. But I also have no idea what all is possible with that kind of information in the aggregate.

At the very least, I assume they will use it to manipulate us even more with disinformation.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Easier, imagine half the strangers you’ve met during the day reading your messages aloud with orcish laughs and judging the pictures.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

But I also have no idea what all is possible with that kind of information in the aggregate

so does your mom and the general public. This idea and its impact is far too remote to people’s day to day life.

  • “Yes, they can collect all they want, why should I care?”
  • “My data is too insignificant to be meaningful for anyone, LMAO, do you think I am some kind of a CEO?”

it may help to try coming out with a story or incident that they can relate to. then again most of the time these stories will sound like a conspiracy theory,

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m so exhausted at people who answer like this.

It makes me feel crazy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

That article may as well be sponsored by WhatsApp. Zero direct mentions of Signal, but tons pushing people to WhatsApp. That’s a bit disappointing.

Edit: I was wrong, it does talk about Signal as well.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

The second half of the article is about Signal.

It sucks they mention WhatsApp first, but I think the bigger omission is that they don’t mention non-US entities or anything you can self-host and federate like Matrix.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Oh, fair enough then!

ETA: Yes, the lack of mentions of Matrix, etc are a bit disappointing. But I think Matrix is waaay outside their target democratic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeeahhh, they’re talking to like Grandma who barely knows what a text message is

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Their target democratic is still in the matrix.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Matrix isn’t super private though. It’s halfway there, but compared to something like XMPP, it falls short due to the fact that any instance a user federates with gets a gigantic copy of all of their metadata, and the server operator can do whatever they want with it. So all you would have to do is spin up a new host, message a target user and get them to respond, and you’re done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

any instance a user federates with gets a gigantic copy of all of their metadata,

No, it does not. Instances get metadata only for the chat rooms in which they participate, not all of a user’s metadata.

When chatting with someone on Matrix like you would with text messaging, only your instance and your contact’s instance are involved. Because they have to be, in order to exchange messages. Just like every other chat protocol that uses servers, including XMPP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Use Signal or XMPP+OMEMO or anything else.

Mandate social media to expose an open API and use the chat function with an OTR plugin.

The solutions are all old.

It’s just interesting how it all went from promotion of corporate surveillance to comms protection when supposed corporate shills won the election.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Is Matrix Protocol good?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Why do you suggest OTR? It’s outdated, modern XMPP clients moved to OMEMO for a reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s not outdated, it’s just differently intended. OTR you can use over any IM allowing custom clients. OMEMO requires support in the protocol.

OTR is better than inline PGP for that purpose, because of temporary keys.

So if you have a legislation mandating that a certain IM network or social platform supports open API for custom clients, you can use OTR over it, you can use inline PGP over it, but you can’t use OMEMO over it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It would be great if XMPP were to rise again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It went out of popularity for a reason. I’d love a new protocol with XMPP’s mistakes fixed.

BTW, OMEMO highlights one of those - it’s not as good as Signal by which it is inspired. Basically no metadata protection, which means that it’s as good as OTR with multiple devices.

Some kind of Signal with federation (and good clients, not like signal-desktop) would be interesting. Maybe even p2p with some kind of relays (like in NOSTR) for history, offline messages, some kind of Telegram channels and such.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Look into Session. I didn’t like it but it checks your boxes

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Lol no. I like being able to send messages to someone who isn’t online at the same time

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Are you suggesting xmpp can’t do that? XD

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

I’m actually really not concerned about foreign governments spying on me but I am bothered by my own government, the guys with the guns who can arrest me, doing it.

Tho I suspect if the government is recommending ways to avoid messages being intercepted, they’ve already cracked how to intercept them.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

What’s rich is the FBI promoting WhatsApp. Yeah, not a fucking chance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yeah we can all trust Meta, who never should have been allowed to purchase Whatsapp for antitrust reasons exactly like this. Whatsapp was innovative and very successful outside the US, rather than compete with their own decent product Facebook just absorbed them and gulped their users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

That is why Signal exists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not to be too conspiratorial, but isn’t that a pretty good indicator that Meta capitulated and put a backdoor in WhatsApp for them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Signal or WIRE.

When the article about end to end user encryption messaging platforms mentions neither I have to question why it’s even an article.

Signal or WIRE.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

It does mention Signal lower down the article

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.7K

    Posts

  • 153K

    Comments