Summary

President Joe Biden touted his administration’s economic recovery efforts, citing job growth, reduced inflation, and infrastructure investments, as he prepares to hand off a strong economy to Donald Trump.

Biden criticized Trump’s proposed steep tariffs on imports, warning they could harm the economy and reintroduce inflation.

Trump plans tariffs against China, Mexico, and Canada, raising concerns about trade disruptions similar to those seen during his first term.

Economists caution that such policies could quickly reverse recent economic gains and weaken the U.S. economy.

64 points

Just do another round of stimulus check and let Donny deal with the bill. 😏

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Ooh. Yeah!

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

And this time put Joe Biden’s name on the checks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

“We’ll allow it, but only for corporate America and those making >$500k/year” -Sinema and Manchin

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

This would be the best way to end the last 20 days, and mass parsons because fuck it whynot

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

The best way to end it is for Biden to have Trump and friends disappeared to a CIA black site.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s a totally legal, and very cool thing to do.

The supremely corrupt court hath made the president into a king with unchecked power to slaughter the entire United States.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Here comes Biden with the steel chair!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Haha, very funny, I too want to live in a civil war hellscape!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Can’t do that without also controlling congress which he doesn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What are they going to do, claw it back after the checks go out?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The checks would bounce

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

more like stabilize. without the second term to actually make some progress this is going to go in the shitter fast.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

People really can’t understand the economy turns like the Titanic. Trump fucked it, but we didn’t see the real effects until Biden’s term. We were heading into another Great Depression, and coupled with the effects of Covid, people massively underestimate how well the economy actually did under Biden.

Trump will coast on the Biden administration’s success for a while, and will take the credit. Once he fully fucks everything (and IF there are fair elections in 2028, which doesn’t seem likely), a future democratic administration will be blamed for the effects of trump’s fuckery. Repeat ad infinitum.

That’s how it’s worked for a century, and uninformed voters will always fall for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Nah. It takes much more to build than to burn down. This is why bush senior had to do the things that angered his base. Whats been built in the last four years will fall within 2. Even trumps first term it was actually covid which allowed him to get through it. Obama was not able to really get things good in two after bush jr.s two wars and when trump dropped rates and overheated everything the market was due for a big crash but covid ironically created this wierd condition were it bounced back due to the stimulus of the checks and just that generally the haves did not want to fuck around with that shit going. Everything became about keeping things going. Its gonna be a rough few years coming up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

You thought inflation was bad. Get ready for Trumpflation.

I guess that’s better then renaming the war economy “Bidenomics”

Grow food if you can now folks shit is about to get bad. Buy flour in mass if you can.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Not flour, unground wheat berries. Cheaper to buy in bulk with a much longer shelf life.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But your hand grain mill will cost 3x as much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

True, if you need a fancy mill it can be expensive. However, if this a survival food you can find a way to grind it with rocks or whatever else you have access to in the event that you need to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s a one time cost though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Flour doesnt last forever and its a fire hazard, so no.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

If the democrats are so sick of getting swapped out maybe they should field some decent candidates.

permalink
report
reply
34 points
*

Unless your idea of a good candidate is George Clooney or Oprah than this isn’t a problem that can be fixed with ‘better candidates’.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Those answers make me unreasonably angry. The absolute stupidity is astounding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Those aren’t my idea of good candidates either. My idea of a good candidate would be someone ethical, that wants to improve life for our citizens, that values constitutional values and the rule of law. I am not sure such a person exists in the US that is capable of winning the presidency.

In your picture above, just because a few morons vote for silly reasons doesn’t invalidate the value of having actual good representation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

There’s value in good representation, but it’s just not going to help us win elections so it’s moot.

The most ethical, constitutional, kind of loving candidate in the world is worth jack shit if they can’t win an election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The people in that image voted for Trump. They’re describing Donald Trump.

Your idea of a good candidate is useless when Voters are morons that think Trump is the good candidate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

‘Believe in Christ’? How the fuck do people see that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

If voters demonstrated one thing this year, it’s that the decency of the candidate is utterly irrelevant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s not relevant to Republicans, but it got Democrats to stay home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Staying home was, in effect, a vote for indecency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

There was nothing wrong with Harris except seven million people who voted for Biden weren’t ready for her to become president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It is more like 250k in 4 states that flipped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Harris got about seven million less votes then Biden.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

There was nothing wrong with Harris except seven million people who voted for Biden weren’t ready for her to become president.

I didn’t enjoy what she did as district attorney. I would also argue if she was not electable in 2024, then she doesn’t meet the bar of a “good candidate”. Now her viability is irrelevant entirely, unless she plans to run in 2028.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I would also argue if she was not electable in 2024, then she doesn’t meet the bar of a “good candidate”.

I think it is more of a reflection of the voters and non-voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Harris, like Hillary, was put forward without the express will of the people - she didn’t win a primary over Biden, because there was no primary elections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Arguably the “will of the people” was exercised through them supporting the Democratic party. The Democratic party put forth a new candidate in accordance with their own guidelines, which were in place prior to 2024. This was no coup, it was the Democratic party putting forth a candidate as they may. This is not new. They can put forth anyone they wish.

Kamala was put into place by receiving the most votes during a virtual roll call: https://ballotpedia.org/Democratic_delegate_rules%2C_2024

If one supports the Democratic party, surely one would sanction the process by which Kamala became the presidential candidate, as they were acting in accordance of their own party guidelines, which were in place long before this election. If a president would have withdrew prior to Biden, the exact same process would have taken place. A similar action took place in 1972 when VP nominee Thomas Eagleton withdrew. None of this is new.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think the bigger problem is that she is a non-white woman.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nah. Their masters wouldn’t like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Or what? What are we going to do about it if they field another pro-corporate candidate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The same thing people did this time – vote Republican or stay home. I think the outcome of the latest election makes it clear how ineffective the democrats are. By a lot of metrics, Donald Trump was not that successful of a presidency, and despite that, the democrats were not able to field anyone that could defeat him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

facts. all their candidates suck. Kamala Harris was an embarrassment and the people who still support her after such a catastrophic failure are the exact reason she lost: echo chamber. out of touch with reality. delusional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

This is a false equivalency. Harris wouldn’t send migrants to concentration camps. She wouldn’t attack our allies. She wouldn’t cut social security and VA benefits. Instead she wanted to help normal people like you and me.

Trump constantly praises dictators such as Putin, Xi Jinping, Kim Jong-Un and has a history of sexually assaulting people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

She said she wanted to help “normal people”… yet she didn’t list a single useful policy prescription. In fact, when asked if she would do anything differently, she said she wouldn’t change anything from what Biden did… despite Biden NOT helping normal people like you and me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Honestly I liked her. I thought she’d make good decisions on the hot seat. But I think she let her advisors push her to the right, into a milquetoast corporate campaign. And that’s what killed it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

It basically happens every cycle, easy to go back all the way to George Bush Sr -> Clinton ( if not earlier).

But the problem is, the current economic boom is even more K-shaped than any other in recent history; half of the population are struggling worse than before, but their plight is masked by an incredible boom for the other half.

I can’t blame the working class for thinking back to ~2016, and remembering things fondly.

Trump will only make the current situation worse, but I can at least understand how the US ended up in its current predicament.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

What is K shape? Like V but added flat? Or just direction where right side of K goes both up and down?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Chart taken from Investopedia’s article on K-shaped Recovery; but the underlying principle is the same: Some parts of the economy are performing so well that it masks the other sectors which are struggling.

i.e. the rich are getting so much wealthier, that when looking at the overall average the number is trending positively and not showing that the rest of society is getting poorer. This is one of the reasons when using aggregate measures, the median value is significantly more valuable than the average.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The rich got richer (top of K) the poor got poorer (bottom of K).

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments