A woman is dead following a “tragic chain of events” that began with a bomb threat against Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene at her Rome home, police said.

170 points

You left out the best part:

According to Rome police, the department received an email listing Greene’s home address and saying a pipe bomb had been placed in her mailbox shortly after 7 p.m. on Friday, Dec. 6. The email initially went to a junk folder and was not seen until Monday at about 9:30 a.m.

permalink
report
reply
73 points

And rather than the journalists saying “three days old” and giving exact dates, it’s just “Monday”

It was opened at 9:30 on December 9th. It sat in the junk folder all weekend, the police found it, and a police officer driving a personal truck killed someone

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*

“Look what you made me do!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Seems like it would’ve been better to call Marjorie to tell her not to open her mailbox instead of rushing to the house at speed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

They weren’t rushing to the house at speed. The accident occurred when an officer was driving his personal vehicle to the department so that he could get ready to respond to the situation.

The lady who died pulled out from a parking lot in front of him, and got t-boned on the driver side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Well, that seems like a non-department-related accident. My employer isn’t responsible if I get in an accident on my way to work, not sure why that would be different here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Yeah, the cop was definitely speeding though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Given that it’s MTG, the first thing she would probably do after being told not to open her mailbox would be to open her mailbox. Not that I’m saying it’s a bad plan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, just tell her it’s the woke liberals tell her what she can and can’t do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

The article says it was someone rushing to the bomb squad HQ, not to MTG’s house. Also it says they contacted her first and she wasn’t home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So they were rushing to an empty house to rescue who exactly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

so the spam filters worked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I also filter email from Matt Gaetz to Junk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Why is Matt Gaetz emailing you? Are you a high school girl?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They might be. lemmy.world rules require someone be 18+, though I doubt he’d go after a senior.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Obviously the bomb was waiting for read receipt before arming, duh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
123 points

On the way to the headquarters in their personal vehicle, a Rome Police sergeant and bomb squad member collided with another vehicle driven by 66-year-old Tammie Pickelsimer.

A Georgia State Patrol spokesperson said the traffic incident is still under investigation, but according to the initial findings, Pickelsimer’s 2002 Mazda Protege pulled out of a Rome parking lot into the path of the officer’s 2015 GMC Sierra truck. The officer applied the brakes but the truck struck the Mazda near the driver’s side front door. Pickelsimer was taken to a hospital where she died from her injuries. The officer suffered minor injuries and has been released from the hospital

  1. clickbait. The lady was not associated with or even anywhere near the purported bomb.

2)…wanna bet the cop was driving at a high rate of speed, in a vehicle without lights and sirens?

permalink
report
reply
57 points
*

I’d argue it isnt clickbait and is a fairly accurate title. Motorist killed as police respond. The motorist was hit while the police were responding. The title never claimed the motorist had anything to do with the bomb threat, that was the context for the police response. Typically when the headline is refering to someone involved with the crime, they use the term suspect. The fact they used motorist actually gave me a hint it was an unassociated party that was hit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

The only way it’s misleading is in the usual refusal to acknowledge that the police killed this innocent person. It’s always the same passive voice, as if people keep magically dropping dead when the police happen to be around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It including that it was to a bomb threat towards green implies an untrue association.

Was the title technically accurate? Yes. Is it still click bait? I’d say yes. Cops kill people responding to (and no where near,) calls with a startling regularity.

Some cop got up and yehawwed through traffic without the usual aids to make it safe. It happens. It’s almost never reported.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A headline trying to get you to read an article!? The scandal of the century.

It doesn’t imply that the motorist had any association with the crime. It barely implies that the two events are related and doesn’t even suggest that the police were involved in the killing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I wouldn’t concede the technically accurate part myself. That second paragraph really throws that into doubt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Where do you get they were responding? This says they were heading to headquarters in a personal vehicle. They’re not rushing to the scene of anything here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They were called in for a bomb threat (as bombsquads usually are,) but had to report to the station first.

so they were “responding” to the bomb threat, but had to go gear up before actually heading out. So it’s fair to say they were “responding”, particularly since highly specialized cops like bomb techs only catch certain kinds of calls, and other cops stay the hell away from them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Personal vehicle: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/12/10/marjorie-taylor-greene-bomb-threat-car-crash/76884681007/

I’m sure it’ll come out later that he was speeding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Sometimes, cops that are frequently on call are allowed to install lights or sirens on personal cars so they can get into their station quickly.

Bombsquad calls are less frequent but generally urgent.

In any case, I would suggest he was driving like he had lights and sirens, despite not having them. Which makes it incredibly unsafe to do, and places blame squarely on the cop. (Though the article made sure to mention she pulled into his way.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Though the article made sure to mention she pulled into his way

I mean, like it or not, that’s the way the law reads and is applied. We run into it with motorcycles all the time. Barring extreme cases, the car that pulls in front of the speeding vehicle is ‘at fault.’

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

2)…wanna bet the cop was driving at a high rate of speed, in a vehicle without lights and sirens?

I wouldn’t bet against it but I’ve had the same thing happen. Buddy was driving and it was a bright sunny summer afternoon. We were doing all of 30MPH and an old lady pulled out onto the road maybe 20’ in front of us. The Samurai we were in was totaled and so was her Buick. She didn’t die but she did spend a couple of days in hospital. I bounced my head off the windshield so hard I was knocked out and I bent the passenger door out a good 4" with my right arm / elbow. My buddy was also knocked out from banging his head off the windshield even with his seatbelt on. That can happen when your vehicle is suddenly gets 18" shorter.

I’m not defending the cop but sometimes drivers just do dumb shit, especially older ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Sure. Stuff happens.

But given the urgency in the cop… I have to assume he was rather more than somewhat at fault.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Also a good reason why driving a giant vehicle like a GMC Sierra that smashes anything it touches shouldn’t be free. A higher vehicle tax on something like that would be appropriate, instead they get higher tax write-offs and lower emissions and safety standards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

wanna bet the cop was driving at a high rate of speed, in a vehicle without lights and sirens?

Only if you’re giving like +1500, then I might bet like $10

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

lol, my usual go-to internet wager is pet photos. Doesn’t even need to be your pet :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

When cat photos are exchanged we all win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And probably distracted using his laptop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The officer applied the brakes

Of course they applied their brakes, just like they “fear for their life” or “told the citizen to comply” while beating their brains out - they just make up whatever fanciful lies they can to escape the justice they purport to represent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

“The department holds the individual responsible for sending the threatening email fully accountable for setting this tragic chain of events into motion.

“Guys it’s literally not even the drivers fault”

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Man, fuck the police.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

When her family sues, the pig is going to make a qualified immunity defense. It’s fucking disgusting.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I don’t think qualified immunity affects civil suits like wrongful death. AFAIK it only covers criminal charges like murder.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Other way around. Qualified immunity prevents cops from being sued. It does not shield them from criminal charges.

(The corrupt prosecutorial and judicial systems do that instead.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Homer Simpson: “Only covers criminal charges… so far”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It covers civil liability if you meet the requirements listed in Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982).

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Foreign agents getting the police to kill us, one by one.

Of course the police take zero responsibility. Their accounting of the events includes apply the brakes a piece of information that sounds sus.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Yea of a car pulls out in front of a citizen that might have been going 1mph over the limit and slams on the breaks but the person who pulled out dies the driver that was “speeding” 100% will be charged.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 197K

    Comments