309 points

He now has 100 problems

permalink
report
reply
39 points

/thread

permalink
report
parent
reply
119 points

I’m glad that “rape” is in the headline. Too many try to sugar coat. “Sex with an underage…” etc.

permalink
report
reply
74 points

We’re only getting that because the accused are black.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

No its because it’s a he, it’s usually “sex with a minor/student” if it’s a woman perpetrator and rape if it’s a man

permalink
report
parent
reply
-59 points

Ohh yes a poor black man is suffering from systemic racist

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Is that really the message you’re taking from my comment?

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

How is this not a criminal charge…

I feel like going civil route is diluting the gravity of what actually went down.

Where did they find 13 year old to rape?

Where are fucking parents of these children?

Between CEO getting executed and another elite child rapist… Who fucking rules us?

permalink
report
reply
67 points
*

Who fucking rules us?

Sociopaths mostly I’d say.

There’s a great Tom Waits song called God’s away on business with some pertinent lyrics:

who are the ones we left in charge? Killers, thieves and lawyers

Great song btw.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

That’s from Waits’ stage adaptation of the famous German unfinished manuscript Woyzeck (Voy-chek), it was a song from act 1 setting the scene in which a working class man would be toyed with and experimented on by high society and the army, driven to madness and killing his wife and himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

I don’t know details of this, but when the lawyer had a press conference announcing info the first 100 lawsuits, he mentioned that a lot of the crimes were reported to authorities at the time, but for whatever reason, the crimes weren’t pursued.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Oh I can tell you why.

Cops don’t give a shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Bingo.

I chose to use the word authorities and not cops specifically because it isn’t just cops that don’t care about the wellbeing of women. It’s incredibly frustrating for that to be the case in the year 2024, but it’s true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

If you read the article, the alleged victim says she went to the VMAs without a ticket and started asking limo drivers if she could get into an afterparty. Diddy’s driver said she looked like what Diddy wanted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

The allegations are that she was hanging out by the stage door after a show. Maybe she wanted an autograph or to meet her idol? But even if she specifically sought out these men because she wanted to have sex with them, and even if her parents were wildly irresponsible, there is no excuse for drugging and raping a child.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Jay agrees:

“These allegations are so heinous in nature that I implore you to file a criminal complaint, not a civil one!! Whomever would commit such a crime against a minor should be locked away, would you not agree?” Carter said in a statement to NBC News. “These alleged victims would deserve real justice if that were the case.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Yeah becuase he knows it can’t be proven beyond reasonable doubt now and the has money to fight it.

They did get a conviction v Weinstein though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
1 point

Yeah becuase he knows it can’t be proven beyond reasonable doubt now

Oof.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Burden of proof is much higher in a criminal case. It’s very hard to prosecute people for crimes that occurred 20+ years ago, but with a civil suit they are probably hoping for a settlement. Based on his statement, sounds like that’s not going to happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

And that’s why crimes should be reported when they happen so proper evidence is collected.

I deff think Jay z did due to Diddy affiliation but this is he said, she said now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Diddy was affiliated with every rapper in NYC back then. I don’t think we can assume that everyone who ever associated with him shared his predelictions.

I think Jay probably got looped in on the lawsuit because they know he was at the party and he is filthy rich.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Because a criminal trial is an all-or-nothing charge, and if you fail to convince 1 juror, Jay-Z gets zero punishment for raping a 13 year old. Your odds of winning a civil trial over rape is much higher, and even if the defendant puts up a good case, you won’t walk away empty handed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

You can do both a criminal and a civil charge. Failing to convict on a criminal charge doesn’t mean a civil case will go the same way. See OJ for example.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

You forgot another question: why nobody said shit in the past 24 years?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Many rape victims don’t come forward until others do, if at all.

Going up against a couple of billionaire child-rapists isn’t likely to get you anything other than slut-shamed at best. These are powerful people who can have you disappeared.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not the victims the ones who went to these parties

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The statute of limitations is likely over

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

In thought that child abuse is exempt from it

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Statutes vary wildly by state, with the exception of murder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

diluting the gravity

In fairness he did say it was “fake physics”

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

I didn’t expect Jay-Z to get roped into this. But he’s a big time musician and they seem to have felt like they can get away with raping teenage groupies for many decades now.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Makes me wonder how BIG would fit into all of this if he was still alive. I’m thinking it wouldn’t be good for him either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I’m sorry… are you saying it’s not their fault that they raped teenagers because it didn’t occur to them to ask them their age?

Despite a history of music stars raping teenagers going back to at least Elvis and Jerry Lee Lewis in the 1950s?

What absolute nonsense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Sounds like people have known for a while and haven’t prevented kids from being around them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I think the difference between a 13 year old and an 18 year old is generally pretty obvious and if you can’t tell then don’t even risk it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Lol this is the hill you’re going to die on? You can put any 13 year old in front of me and I’ll immediately know it’s a child, you know, because they are children.

This is not a good look.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ew. You’re gross 🤢

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points
*

Never meet your idols.
I seriously stopped being a fan of any public figure because people seeking public attention are mostly off-putting at least. Then come the narcissists and psychopaths, it gets only worse.

permalink
report
reply
47 points

Never meet your idols

Especially if you’re a teenage girl

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

And yet parents allow their children attend these concerts… Then pika face when their children get raped or worst ignore it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

if Jay-z is your idol then you really have bigger problems lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

At least 99 of them

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Or don’t idolize idiots. Popstars and corporations washed the market so much that they are now accepted by the public as smart or cool. Not so many years ago everyone considered them trashy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Don’t idolize any one person. Idolize ideas and actions, people are too easily corrupted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I never understood adults larping some fucking clown on tv and internet but here we are adult men defending some rapper clown

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

If your idol turns out to be a jerk in real life, is that their fault, or does it mean you’re just a bad judge of character? And I mean generally - not you in particular.

Personally, I’d be more than happy to meet my idols. I’ve listened to them speak for hundreds, and in some cases thousands, of hours on podcasts. Nobody can hide their true personality for that long. I’m confident I already have a pretty good idea of what they’re like in real life. That’s also why it’s so funny when non-listeners try to convince me that they know these people better than I do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Ignoring that it is possible for people to hide who they are (editing is a thing): I don’t think idolizing podcasters is the flex you think it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Some of us have been conditioned to hide our personalities all the time, until it becomes automatic… We can’t take off the mask even with effort…

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 198K

    Comments