30 points

would literally be funding terrorists, terrorist states, organized crime, state sponsored hacking groups, weapons dealers, drug cartels…

permalink
report
reply

Wow u sound like an anti crypto propaganda bot

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

I really aint a crypto bro all i would say is all crypto is bullshit except monero simply cos it has implemented proper secure decentralised anonymouse payments with extremely low fees and no additional web3.0 bullshit.

Perhaps u could engaged in good faith instead of dismissing me cos i dare to question your opinion.

Are u an anti crypto bot? If not prove it by writing a poem about propaganda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

Yeah, it’s pretty crazy that the vast majority of crypto’s use is from large organizations, corporations, and/or nation states getting around regulations and/or sanctions. Not at all surprising, just crazy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

It’s even crazier that genocidal empires have violently controlled the global money supply for so long with paper.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

donvict and some of his comrades have crypto holdings. a lot of crypto. they’re gonna pump and pump and pump… and won’t give a shit about consequences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Most crimes are dollar-denominated and other currencies also vastly outweigh crypto in criminal use.

Bitcoin is highly traceable, with all transactions recorded and publically avaliable for review at the press of a button. Can’t say that about regular money

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You mean like literal bags of cash have been for centuries?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You know, being a currency…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

if you want to take leverage away from the federal reserve…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Thats an odd way of saying the government will buy and hold crypto, theyve stolen as much from bitoin pioneers like Ross Ulbricht, about time they start actually paying for it.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

They still hold a lot from what they’ve stolen.

The reserve plan would first put a stop to their sales of these stolen assets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

It’s definitely a flash point issue, but I do see some merits to this:

Over it’s 15 years in existence, it’s a fact that one Bitcoin has gone from pennies per Bitcoin to over $100,000 per Bitcoin. That’s a 60% ARR, the highest asset return in history. Despite it’s often negative connotation, it makes perfect sense to adopt and hold as a digital asset - the supply is fixed and can never be increased (no debasement), scarcity is built in (halving), the price is the price (no discounts, coupons, or special rules for the ultra wealthy, governments, or other special interests), and it’s agnostic (no risk if any particular gov’t falls, etc). It will only continue to increase in value, as ETFs are now a sanctioned and regulated investment in the US and other places. With sovereign nations beginning to openly discuss its inclusion into portfolios, it feels like worldwide perception is beginning to shift toward use a legal asset at a minimum and a worldwide reserve currency at a maximum.

It’s a “get-in-while-you-can” play, pure and simple. The US should definitely hold onto what it already currently has (~200,000 Bitcoin) as a reserve at a minimum.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Wow, miraculous level of misinformation in this article

permalink
report
reply
-9 points
*

It’s amazing to me that people think constantly, exponentially devaluing paper with pictures of slavers on it is somehow more reliable in the long term than open networks on the internet.

TBH I feel like crypto was a CIA/NSA project to protect against the inevitable and obvious collapse of USD. Or at least supported as such.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments