Darth Vader: “You are in command now, Admiral Plett”
Plett: (nervously) “Thank you, Lord Vader”
Trouble? No, but they’ll raise the compensation to compensate for risk, which will only attract greedier more sadistic candidates.
Or…
They’ll hire a woman to clean up the mess (possibly at reduced compensation), because that’s the virtue signaling what corporations do when they are in a tight spot. Then, once she has turned things back around, they’ll swap a man back in and give him a bonus for all her hard work.
They should make a whistleblower the ceo so they can have plausible deniability when the ceo is murdered
They are referencing the “coincidental” Boeing whistleblower deaths this year. If a whistleblower was made CEO and subsequently murdered, then being the CEO of a hated corporation is now a plausible reason that could mask that of being a whistleblower.
Countries have dead leaders that get replaced all the time, what makes corporations replacing CEOs any different?
I’ll take the job. But, fair warning, a lot of people will receive free healthcare.
I sure as shit wouldn’t take that job.
I would, then I’d just shitpost on LinkedIn about not doing evil things until they fire me for not being evil.
Golden parachute here I come. Honestly, this was on them, they clearly don’t do enough background checks.
