Just crazy what is happening

101 points

It’s scary that apparently russia can significantly alter european elections by running tiktok campaigns

permalink
report
reply
41 points

No, what’s actually scary is that we can see brain-washing on social media in realtime for years and you -like a lot of people- are still surprised because you are totally oblivious to what’s happening right before your eyes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

That seems like an unnecessarily rude way to put it. A major nation using the full force of its intelligence/military apparatus to manipulate the average person minding their own business using ever evolving forms of propaganda isn’t something I really feel a citizen should need to deal with on a personal level. I don’t believe most people feel or should feel they are the target of another nation, especially one they are not in a hot war with. Our governments are failing us by allowing it to happen because enough of them don’t have the desire to stop it.

It is people that look like you, talk like you, live where you do, having the support of people and organizations you trust spreading disinformation. It gets rehashed and passed along by people you see and know in your real life. There is a basic level of personal responsibility, but when no one teaches you how to spot it, when it appears in legitimate media vetted by professionals whose job it is to spot this and they all fail you, crapping on an individual just trying to live their life isn’t right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

It gets rehashed and passed along by people you see and know in your real life.

No, it usually gets rehashed by media that gives a fuck about facts or reality anymore because all that matters is clicks. And clicks are generated by creating outrage and encouraging doom scrolling, not by informing people. Because they have to compete with an even darker pit of ragebait and engagement farming that is social media. Which for a lot of people even replaced other media.

You are right in regards to singular people not being suddenly responsible for falling for a well organised propaganda campaign. Nonetheless nothing of this shitshow fell from the skly suddenly or was quickly created by one bad actor throwing money at it. We are watching the pile of crap that is persistent media failure for many, mnay years now. Without giving a shit about it.

Should governments protect us better? Sure, in a perfect world. But we, not some government, killed the media when we refused to pay for information anymore. And when we happily started shoving bullshit created on social media by algorithms with the sole intent of keeping us engaged into our brains, instead of trying to actually be informed about the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

We’ve known this since they threw the 2016 Brexit referendum, but finally a government has had the balls to call it out and re-do the vote.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

It’s scary, because it also shows how much built-up resentment there is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This. If the people genuinely believed in the current system, there’s no way this shit would work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I also think there are bigger issues with the current system, but that’s an incredibly naive way of looking at it.

Brainwashing is much easier than you think, and social media has made it so much easier to run such psyops campaigns. There will always be some issue you can get people riled up about.

The west is just completely unprepared to deal with military-level budgets being used to push destabilization their societies though social media.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Why can’t the US do the same to Russia’s social media sites? Let them have some political upheaval for a change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I think this play only works on democratic countries unfortunately.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Russia is very locked down. They regularly ban outside media.

On top of that, Putin arrests/assasinates political competition, and puts in place a controlled opposition.

And finally, their elections are fake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Because Russia controls these sites and wouldn’t let any sensible opposition in. Putin is trying to be a dictator for life with illusions of democracy (you need to give ambitious people the illusion that they could do something).

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

As much as many people will dislike the idea: it seems like ‘not letting in foreign sites’ is currently the winning strategy

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We don’t have elections

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

They don’t even have toilets, let alone internet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

*shits comment on lemmy*

Funny tho.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

good that democracies start to protect itself from Russia interference… I prefer to have to vote 10 times if needed than having the power in my country in control of Putin

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I agree, elections should be held fairly or should be held again. I’m not sure what to say to naysayers claiming the establishment controls the results. I also wonder how we can ensure this doesn’t get misused.

It would be great to have broad discussions around the topic and apply these measures when things get out of hand.

I think we must stop personalised automated (selection of) content towards end-users for anything that might be political (and possibly just anything). There could be a place for such systems if the biases and tracking can easily be controlled by end-users such that they could easily apply other points of view.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That’s not how this works

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Wow, didn’t expect that. Let’s see how this turns out. It’s crazy how vulnerable our democracies are towards Russia.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

A top Romanian court has annulled the first round of the country’s presidential election, days after declassified intelligence alleged Russia ran a coordinated online campaign to promote the far-right outsider who won the first round.

The constitutional court’s decision – which is final – came on Friday after President Klaus Iohannis declassified intelligence two days earlier that alleged Russia ran a sprawling campaign comprising thousands of social media accounts to promote Calin Georgescu across platforms like TikTok and Telegram.

Despite being a huge outsider who declared zero campaign spending, Georgescu emerged as the frontrunner on 24 November. He was due to face the reformist Elena Lasconi, of the Save Romania Union party, in a runoff on Sunday.

More details soon …

  • Associated Press, via The Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/dec/06/romanian-court-annuls-first-round-of-presidential-election

permalink
report
reply
32 points

So now that a cout has ruled that there was foreign interference to such a degree that a presidential election has to be redone: At what point does this get treated as an attack by NATO or the EU?

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I haven’t read enough about this, but if this was 1000 accounts convincing a million people to vote for a guy, how is that different from anyone else campaigning? Except if it violates public campaign financing law and you had an unfair advantage from a foreign adversary in what should otherwise be a transparent level playing field…and even then things are never completely level and transparent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Because a foreign power influencing an election is fundamentally different than a domestic campaign. The foreign power has their own interests, which are potentially at odds with the interests of the electorate.

Ostensibly, if you campaign in country A and are a citizen of country A, then you’re “in the same boat” as the electorate. Of course, with economic stratification this becomes increasingly less true (fast food worker may live in same country as $$$ donor, but they are effectively living under different policies).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I understand, but you have to be extremely specific about how you frame foreign/domestic distinction, because these guys are prying from every angle to turn an open society’s vulnerabilities and contradictions against itself. We need a broad-spectrum solution to this (one is cognitive vaccination through education, but it is too late for adults) and until we do, democracies are going to be on their back foot against the global oligarchy, because offense is much more effective than defense against this.

The specific case you seem to be making is if state actors deliberately aim a campaign at your voters. But what if it is only their multinationals, oligarchs, corruption and dirty money, what if it is interest groups, or what if it is “NGOs”, or “the markets” and hedge funds, or cultural products, or what if it is simply large groups of netizens of a friendly state who talk up a specific candidate?

Maybe it is clear when russia does it, but they fumbled it this time with Romania, because they were so effective that it became obvious. In most cases it will not be this obvious and they will use multiple of the methods described above. All I am saying is that once they get inside voters’ heads, it’s hard to go and say that it is illegitimate because the people were influenced by effective propaganda.

PS: I still am not sure what happened here, there seem to also have been cyberattacks and leaking of credentials to make the election insecure, but the messaging is mixed because in the middle of this there are references to tiktok. I assume it is something similar to voter register data being leaked, which helps laser-target disinformation. I just hope this doesn’t turn against us when we want to vote out someone and can’t because foreign interference made the voters do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s very difficult, because there was no violence involved in the interference.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

It’s an attack nonetheless, just on our way of life instead of an actual physical target and there have been plenty of those too.

I’m getting so fucking tired of Western democracy just eating shit and shrugging in the name of not escalating.

We keep shrugging and we’re all gonna be living in Russian aligned autocracy in the next fifty years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I agree, there must be more sanctions, better security and preventative measures. Scolding an embassador won’t fix this.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.org

Create post

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They’re cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 8.6K

    Comments