Summary

House Republicans blocked efforts to release the Ethics Committee’s report on former Rep. Matt Gaetz, prolonging uncertainty over allegations of sexual misconduct despite his resignation from Congress.

Democrats pushed for transparency, accusing Republicans of hiding credible allegations. Speaker Mike Johnson argued that publishing the report sets a bad precedent.

While ethics reports have rarely been released post-resignation, tensions remain high on the bipartisan committee.

Gaetz denies wrongdoing, and DOJ previously closed its sex trafficking probe without charges. The report’s fate is unclear as the congressional session nears its end.

76 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
13 points

“If you have nothing to hide, then you have nothing to fear” is their own argument! I feel it’s only fair to hold them to their own standards, even if they themselves refuse to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

every member of the GOP is knee deep in child sex trafficking

Why do you think the qons had their thought leaders tell all the idiots in their base that Democrats were doing sex-trafficking out of the basement of a basementless pizza parlor?

It’s always projection.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

The best part about that was that 6 months prior the owner gave an interview where he said they stored all the ingredients in the “basement”… 6 months later they suddenly had no basement

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Cowards.

permalink
report
reply
48 points

OK then it’s time for someone to leak it

permalink
report
reply
25 points

100%. And until that happens, we should all just assume the worst case possible is what they found.

Just like if evidence is destroyed for a trial, the jury is instructed to infer that it must be so damaging that the destruction and their imagination of its contents was somehow a better outcome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If they leak it, the media will suddenly have a case of morals and refuse to print it. That’s just how these things go.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

It’d be a shame if someone violated his right to privacy and leaked it.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Right to privacy don’t apply for elected officials.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

16 Democrats were absent. If 9 of them would have showed up both bills would have passed. Sources:

https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2024491 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2024490

The list of Democrats who didn’t vote on both of the measures is the same. Here is the list:

  • Earl Blumenauer
  • Jamaal Bowman
  • Jasmine Crockett
  • Henry Cuellar
  • Dwight Evans
  • Lizzie Fletcher
  • Ruben Gallego
  • Jimmy Gomez
  • Raúl M. Grijalva
  • Ted Lieu
  • Kevin Mullin
  • Marie Gluesenkamp Perez
  • Katie Porter
  • Mikie Sherrill
  • Eric Swalwell
  • Jennifer Wexton
permalink
report
reply
10 points

Wow, super disappointed to see some of these high profile names.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You have to wonder if the “absence” was intentional, a de facto no vote, but defensible. Sadly, the only reason I can think of why they’d avoid participating is because they wouldn’t want such a report released on them in retaliation, which implies skeletons in their closets or those of fellow Dems. If there are other reasons I’d like to hear them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I will never understand how these people get elected when they can’t even bother to show up for work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Rules for the three, not for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 212K

    Comments