Summary

Donald Trump and Republicans are falsely framing his 2024 election win as a historic “landslide” and sweeping mandate, despite the data showing otherwise.

Trump won the popular vote by just 1.6%, the smallest margin for a winning president since 1968, and his 307 electoral votes rank low in U.S. history.

Crucial Senate and House gains were limited, with Republicans relying on gerrymandering for their narrow House majority.

This exaggeration of victory serves to justify potential power expansions, but the facts debunk claims of an unprecedented or overwhelming mandate.

-7 points

He won bro. He’s president of the ENTIRE COUNTRY it doe at matter how you cope.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

He does everything he blames the other side of doing, which means he cheated. Ballot boxes were burned. Mail-in ballots went “missing”. They rigged the election just well enough for it to not be glaringly obvious to those who weren’t paying as much attention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

yeah we know, what’s your point

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ok

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You went around telling people that about Obama and Biden too, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah. That’s how elections work lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yea. Cool story bro. It’s a sporting event. Put on your cheerleader outfit and jump around.

(P.S. that is what you sound like)

permalink
report
parent
reply
204 points
*

It’s time to nip that lie in the bud

Frankly, I’m sick and tired of nipping MAGA lies in the bud every day. It’s been the better part of a decade of this bullshit already… I fucking hate that my countrymen chose this for us for the next four years. Fuck every Trump voter, but a much bigger fuck you goes out to all the jackasses that stayed home on the 5th. You’re complicit, and I don’t give a shit why you think fascism is “okay” as long as you got to punish the Democratic Party for your grievances.

permalink
report
reply

If you voted for Harris, you’re complicit, and I don’t give a shit why you think blue fascism is “okay” as long as it means your rights are protected at the expense of others

Edit: to be clear, I mean complicit in the currently occurring Palestinian genocide and overall maintenance of the status quo

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

My choice was Trump or not!Trump.

I picked not!Trump. Harris could have been a literal turkey sandwich on a plate, I still would have voted for her. She’s not great, I actually wanted to vote for Bernie Sanders in Andrew Yang’s body, but that’s not gonna happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply

My choice was revolution or status quo.

I picked, and continue to pick, revolution

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

“If you voted for the only other viable option in the election, you’re responsible for Trump” is a very strange claim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

Exactly, until media reframes this from distraction politics to a call to action none of this matters. Wake me up when we have a functioning government again.

I’ll be focusing locally on building mutual aid networks and contributing as much as I can to local policy and governance.

mutualaidhub.org/

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I’m sick and tired of anywhere near half of the voting public choosing him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points
*

I think the bigger message is that our information environment is totally screwed.

The eye-opener for me was watching our local news station interview college students coo and rave over how “strong” he was and repeat (apparently not) obvious misinformation.

It wasn’t about apathy, not really… He just won an influencer war. And now the CEO of Twitter is basically president…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Wait until the idiots graduate and look for a job. The Orange Bag of Shit holds the record for US unemployment and he has a very good chance of breaking it again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

To be fair, and president would have been screwed over during covid, even if they had “contained” it (which, looking at China, seems highly unlikely).

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

That’s pedantic. They won the trifecta of government. The definition of landslide is academic at this point.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

It might only be pedantic/academic if the term was only being used in an educational setting. Instead, it’s bandied about nearly every day since the election, and it does need to stop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

the point is to wake us up to that our resistance coalitions needn’t be small

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

resistance coalitions

Good luck with that. The last chance for an organized resistance was the 90’s before we put in mass surveillance. It’s game set and match at this point. The only chance now is maybe the hardcore blue states succeed, but that didn’t end well last time either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

the best time was 25 years ago. the second best time is right now. it’s a lot like planting a tree.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

The “resistance” is ineffective and fractured because its supposed leaders are largely genocidal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

who? name names. who are these resistance leaders aiding in genocide. and don’t say joe biden. if you say joe biden you don’t understand what we’re talking about.

this is a decentralized movement of care. any weakness we have is that we’re uncoordinated because we lack any leadership

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s not academic, it’s relative to the various examples he cites in the article

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Did Mehdi really write this on the 3rd? I’ve heard him saying this at least a week ago. Seems kinda pathetic to rehash this over and over again.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I quote the lyrics of the ABBA’s song: “The winner takes it all - The loser’s standing small”. And this is the truth: in a few years, no one will ask how DT won the election. He simply won and has a strong mandate to pursue his policy. - n’est-ce-pas?

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments