Summary

New Zealand’s royal commission into its Covid-19 response found vaccine mandates were reasonable based on available data but acknowledged they harmed social cohesion.

The report praised the country’s elimination strategy for achieving one of the lowest Covid death rates among developed nations while preventing healthcare system collapse.

However, it criticized prolonged lockdowns, weak health system preparedness, and a lack of planning for future crises.

Commissioners urged broad investment in pandemic readiness and emphasized the importance of both frontline and planning staff.

A second phase of the inquiry will review vaccine harms and conclude in 2026.

-91 points
*

I moved to NZ about 7 years ago and lived through this. I supported the earlier lockdowns and got the vaccine before it became mandated.

Having said that, the mandates that the government pursued were absolutely ruthless, and put in place at a time where efficacy was already reduced due to new variants. It did a lot of harm to society, and we still live with those consequences today.

permalink
report
reply
55 points

Having said that, the mandates that the government pursued were absolutely ruthless

Good.

and put in place at a time where efficacy was already reduced due to new variants.

“Reduced” is not the same as “safe.”

It did a lot of harm to society, and we still live with those consequences today.

Like what? What horrible burden are you living with in New Zealand because of this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Why is it good they were ruthless? Did you live here? Do you know what happened? Is it based on science to force mandates on a population that’s already 95 percent vaccinated? Because it was definitely not what our Ministry of Health recommended…

At the time the mandates were active, Auckland was 95 percent vaxed and rife with covid. At that stage, was it worth it telling five percent of the population they were not allowed to be anywhere but in a supermarket? Was it reasonable taking their jobs away from them? Did the costs outweigh the benefits?

The government’s covid response did a lot of damage to NZ. My wife is a therapist and works with victims of sexual and domestic abuse. Turns out that locking people up with their abusers for months on end is… Very bad for people too.

Vax mandates lead to a huge division in society, including racial and political divides. It will take a long time to recover from that.

I’m not saying all lockdowns are bad, I’m not saying vaccines are bad, I’m saying there’s a cost benefit analysis to be made, and NZ definitely went above and beyond what was reasonable. Towards the end, cabinet kept going against ministry recommendations. Their covid response had become a political tool, not a response based on reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

“My wife is a therapist, trust me bro” is not the evidentiary argument you seem to think it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Thank. You.

Ez upvote holy fuck I’d trade places in a second as an anti-authoritarian, high-covid-risk person ill absolutely take that deal vs living in the land of the walking small pox blankets where the Small Business ™️ must flow.

The absolute fucking gall of comparing that to the 14 characteristics of fascism. Must be nice to be so insulated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Massive mental health impacts for one. Did you live in Auckland throughout COVID? If not then I don’t think you can comment on this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ah, another “trust me, bro” response with no actual evidence. Cool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

Everyone wants to talk about fascism these days, but give covid restrictions a complete pass. I’ve never seen anything like that in my lifetime, where you actually couldn’t go to restaurants without a pass, and had to have papers in order to justify being out in public. Even if you think it was justified, you have to acknowledge that it was extreme authoritarianism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I saw people lose their jobs and get excluded from society in a city that was 95 percent vaccinated, while somehow all my vaccinated friends and myself were sick of covid.

The level of punitive damage done by the mandates was beyond scientific reason. It also went against ministry of health recommendations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Is it authoritarian to say you shouldn’t drive without a license? Is it authoritarian to say you shouldn’t drink and drive?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah i suppose it is technically authoritarian, but society is overwhelmingly ok with it since it is indisputably a good idea. Covid restrictions did not have universal agreement, weren’t as obviously effective and common sense, were unconstitutional in some cases, but most of all too new to have trust from everyone, particularly when messaging was inconsistent or logically flawed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
70 points
*

a lot of harm to society

You mean one of the lowest per capita death rates of any country with transparent reporting? Explain to me how saving tens of thousands of lives in New Zealand was bad without sounding like a dickhead…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

From the report:

Contentious public health measures like vaccine mandates wore away at what had initially been a united wall of public support for the pandemic response; along with the rising tide of misinformation and disinformation, this created social fissures that have not entirely been repaired.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

In another words, it hurt their poor little feelings

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points
*

Yeah, misinformation from conspiracists and right wing politicians wore at the publics resolve and found a home the hearts of other reactionaries and conspiracists. That’s the truth, but it’s not a fault of thee covid response, it’s a fault of people who view society as an enemy

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

We had less deaths than we would have had normally. We also saved a bucket load of jobs by supporting businesses. We, objectively, did better than pretty much anyone else. What seems to continually escape people’s attention is that the NZ health system is shit. We have fuck all hospital beds and fuck all staff. Letting the virus run free would have overrun our system in days. A better health system that ours might have more options than we did, but as it was, we did bloody well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I also lived through this, as did everybody i know and care about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In this thread, many people making judgements based on incorrect facts and ignoring that New Zealand’s biggest city had about a years worth of strict lockdown over the 2 year period from 2020-2021. In this thread you’ll also find New Zealanders from outside of Auckland commenting about their personal experience on behalf of everyone from the country.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

“Those who think that Dr Blakely is a patsy for the previous government … you’ll get a huge surprise when you open that report,” he told NZ media outlet Stuff.

Can someone translate this to English?

permalink
report
reply
11 points

“Dr. Blakeley is not a patsy for the previous government, according to that report”, would be my guess?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Pasty (noun) pale, sticky liquid

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Patsy not pasty

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Ohhhh, sorry! A patsy (watch the spelling!) is someone who takes the fall for, or is otherwise manipulated by someone else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-22 points

We’ve investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing.

permalink
report
reply
18 points
*

More like we followed facts, science, and common sense, and found no wrongdoing. We also now have examples for how to do better mext time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-73 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
69 points

There’s a new government and a complete shift in power. The enquiry is neutral. Nobody’s patting themselves on the back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-51 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

By… stating the objective truth? Do you have an objection to that, or just being contrary?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Please tell us your way of looking at it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Yes, the objectively correct one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Yep. The people who brought the enquiry would love for it to criticise the covid response, as they were the ones cheerleading the naysayers

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

I’m not against the NZ covid response, but it was far from perfect. And if you actually read the enquiry, it does make a lot of criticism on many aspects. It’s not just this headline.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 199K

    Comments