This article was posted shortly before the election but everything in there is still true and seeing his appointees perhaps worse than predicted.

58 points
*

Carl Sagan wrote in 1995:

I have a foreboding of an America in my children’s or grandchildren’s time – when the United States is a service and information economy; when nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries; when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what’s true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness…

The dumbing down of American is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media, the 30 second sound bites (now down to 10 seconds or less), lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance

While there were always idiots, they often lacked the capacity to engage or equip themselves with such a sophisticated web of lies to prop up their beliefs. As such, Joe Schmoe from Bumfuck, Alabama had a limited platform and so could go on his blissfully ignorant way without much harm beyond his county line.

These days? They all communicate together and domestic and foreign operatives can reach them all the same to stoke division.

Crazy to watch.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I hope we can still correct course. The sad part is what many would consider a prediction is more that he was observing trends already happening even back then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

“Democratic collapse nowadays isn’t a matter of abolishing elections and declaring oneself dictator, but rather stealthily hollowing out a democratic system so it’s harder and harder for the opposition to win. This strategy requires full control over the state and the bureaucracy: That means having the right staff in the right places who can use their power to erode democracy’s core functions.”

The establishment Dems and Reps have been doing this for decades. Trump is just the last straw. He’s walking away with the monster they created and he’s probably going to let it off the leash.

The only question I have is whether the oligarchy wants him to do that. Imo they weren’t ready for it last time. They built the monster for someone controllable like Clinton or Jeb!, and I think they were actually surprised when Trump won the first time. This time they made him a nice little play book, and they’ve had some time to learn how to at least keep him pointed in the right direction, if not controlled. They might be ready to release the monster they created. Everyone will blame Trump too, instead of the oligarchy… Bonus.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

He’s also much more senile this time. And they have plenty of experience with that from Reagan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

The only question I have is whether the oligarchy wants him to do that.

Quite a few have explicitly said they do. That’s a big reason why Trump won with Silicon Valley conservatives this year.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It is alarmists. Ill repost this in 4 years when he peacefully leaves office to laugh at u all. Btw does lemmy have a remindme bot or has it been banned like all the other usefull bots.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points
*

+1 for remind me bot
-1 for weimar republic level misinformation

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Who’s “you all”? The people with whom you’ve been arguing will probably all have new user names by then.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Im sure they will. But when they read it they will be forced to admit that im right and thats gonna give them all sorts of self value issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They’ll defend their egos by finding some way in which they’re still right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Peacefully leave after appointing the next president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hush, you’re embarrassing yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You can put a date in your calendar to remember

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think that is beyond their capabilities

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Ah yes peacefully leaves office, just like the first time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Lemmy won’t be allowed in the new Republic, comrade.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

? Trump literally runs his own mastodon. There will definitely be a place for Lemmy in the future. It’ll be an instance called TruthNews run by the

Ministry of Not Fake News

permalink
report
parent
reply

They think they can stop it. Just like they can stop monero, piracy, and encryption?

Plus i dont live in the worlds richest 3rd world nation like u so ill be fine over here in australia with my socialised healthcare and gun free schools.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

And your nanny state. Don’t think the rest of the world doesn’t know Aussies clutch pearls hard enough to crush them. Y’all are a stones throw away from Fascism, mates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That headline though. My inner pedant just cannot leave it alone. Democracy is like Nature. It does not care about you or me or Trump. It will continue to exist as an idea no matter what he does. Other countries will even continue to use it.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Same as anarchism.

Lots of people valuing self reliance and care for others without regard for our existing leaders and systems. There just happens to also be systems of governments around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

excuse my ignorance, but ive always wondered this about anarchism: Seems to me that people gather and organize themselves to reach common goals. How can these organizations not become governments? is that actually possible?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A lot of what is commonly called anarchism isn’t a complete lack of government. It’s more like removing the capitalist system and wealthy elite. Then not having large governments, make stuff like the town council the highest form of government.

I’m not 100% sure how that translates to modern mass infrastructure and global trade but those are the basic ideas as best as I can see.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I think like any other political or philosophical view, this is one of those things where you will get one unique answer per each anarchist you ask.

Speaking personally, I think philosophies should be used as tools, and as the best tool for a job.

To me, anarchism means disregarding established authority and working together to achieve whatever a goal is. Ideally cooperatively. Some groups will perform well at this and some will not. Some will perform better under a more traditional organized structure.

I don’t want to subjugate people with anarchist dogma. I want to help people learn to trust themselves and to cooperate. And I want to get better at it myself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

By avoiding hierarchy. So it’s like how a poker game has a bunch of players, but nobody is the boss of poker. And if somebody starts cheating, you either expel them or form a new group.

The hard part is scaling this up to billions of people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

This is written as if the election were still in the future. We’re going in, and it’s going to be hell. This is the loadout selection screen before the match starts. We need to be thinking of ways we can bolster our communities and defend ourselves.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

This is written as if the election were still in the future

Because it was at the time

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 212K

    Comments