39 points

The author of this article seems to think that choice and alternatives are a bad thing.

I’d like to take the opposite position. The more the merrier. Come on in.

Variety drives open source.

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Variety is good to a point. Too many alternatives and all you get is a bunch of under-resourced and unpolished results.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I disagree.

This assumes that progress on one distro doesn’t lead to progress on others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

There is a difference between feature development and distro maintenance/packaging.

Feature development is done upstream and does flow down to others.

Distro maintenance and packaging is downstream, and almost never provides value to other distros. It usually doesn’t even provide value to the next release. Distro maintenance is a hard, thankless Sisyphean task.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You think there is a dearth of software engineers out there who can’t spend time on something cool like a linux distro?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Well, yeah. Its pretty well established that there is fairly limited resources in open source. Loads of software engineers, very few contributors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I tend to agree. I like being able to install whatever distro I want and add the DE of my choice, and there is a glut of different combos to choose from.

However, are KDE and Gnome going to gradually focus on making their respective DEs work on their own branded OS, rather than any old base system? I know that’s a worst case scenario, but putting a lot of added effort into a full OS is a nontrivial investment for a desktop environment. Some mission drift might be expected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Honestly, I’m all for it.

Both the Plasma and Gnome teams have visions for how systems should be when using their DE, but sometimes existing distros don’t go along with that.

I think it’ll be interesting to see how a Plasma or Gnome distro pans out.

And if I don’t like it, there’s nothing stopping me from simply continuing to use Fedora, or running something else.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

I thought that is what KDE neon is? Didn’t read the article though.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Yes, as is Gnome OS

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Isn’t Neon just Kubuntu with “updated bleeding-edge” KDE?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s worked for cinnamon

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Oh, good more distro fragmentation that’s exactly what the community needs.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I think immutability gaining steam made this a good time for this, normally i’m against distros for the sake of distros, but the kde one is going to be an immutable arch based distro and i think we really needed a good kde immutable arch based distro, and I think it’ll be great for the masses too!

don’t know anything about the gnome one, probably will also be good.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@programming.dev

Create post

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 562

    Posts

  • 4.8K

    Comments