Summary

Warren Buffett gave $1.1 billion in Berkshire Hathaway stock to family foundations and detailed plans for distributing his $147 billion fortune after his death.

His three children will oversee giving the remainder within 10 years, with designated successors in case they predecease him.

Buffett, 94, reaffirmed his belief in avoiding dynastic wealth, favoring philanthropy instead.

Over the years, he has donated $55 billion to the Gates Foundation but plans to shift focus to his family’s foundations.

Buffett continues leading Berkshire Hathaway while preparing Greg Abel as his successor.

-3 points
*

This guy seems like a narcissist. “I haven’t been in the news in a months because of trump, let me do somthing news worthy”

Edit. He’s donating to his own foundation you doughnuts

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

Except this is a good thing, and will encourage others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

This take would make more sense if it wasn’t something he does every year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“donating 1.1 billion to his family’s foundation” he’s literally doing this to avoid paying taxes

You absolute fool

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

“Dragon gives away hoard after death. That will fix all the lives he ruined, right?”

permalink
report
reply
1 point

How did he ruin lives? Didn’t he mostly make his money playing stocks and investing in stuff?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Lemmy, in general, thinks anyone with money is evil, and their money was sucked from the teets of the poor. It’s sort of annoying. Not just super wealthy people, either. If you have any sort of investment that increases in value over time, you’re a bad person. That money should have gone to poor people, somehow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s literally how wealth accumulates.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The money investors get, just by owning the stock, is produced by people working with the stuff the investors money bought. The money isn’t supposed to go to “poor people somehow” it’s supposed to go to the people doing the work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

He’s given billions already.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

if I take 100 dollars from you and give back 10 to random people, does that seem fair?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How did he take 100 from me, though? If I bought shares of Intel and made $100, how is it that I took it from you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

Fuck Warren Buffett. He’s just another scumbag who has soaked up wealth by taking full advantage of neoliberal economics. There are no good billionaires.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

People are so stupid, they look at that figure and go “147 billion. Huh”

That cunt is a fucking greedy evil bastard and is literally causing children to starve to death because people can’t afford food. This evil shit has $18 for every man, woman and child on earth. Think about that.

I’m not some sort of reactionary but I’m astonished how people don’t realise just how much suffering these evil fuckwits are causing.

Burn the cunt on a stake

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Fuckin’ amen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The only correct response honestly.

This fucker, and everyone else should not ever have $147 billion to give away, or anywhere close to it.

I’d argue it isn’t his money anyway. These psychos have concocted a system of capitalism that is inherently theft and exploitation. The wealth is dependent on the masses who are kept poor as wage slaves stuck in a perpetual cycle of produce and consume. Which most of us cannot escape.

The masses are the cement and rebar foundation for the billionaires wealth.

Honestly, it ain’t his money to give away. I wish people would realize this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Buffett gives money to Bill Gates to avoid dynastic wealth. Hmm

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Not Bill Gates, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. “The primary stated goals of the foundation are to enhance healthcare and reduce extreme poverty across the world, and to expand educational opportunities and access to information technology in the U.S.”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Riiiiight. Like the Clinton foundation!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

What’s wrong with the Clinton Foundation?

Beginning in 2015, the foundation was accused of wrongdoing, including a bribery and pay-to-play scheme, but multiple investigations through 2019 found no evidence of malfeasance. The New York Times reported in September 2020 that a federal prosecutor appointed by attorney general Bill Barr to investigate the origins of the 2016 FBI Crossfire Hurricane investigation had also sought documents and interviews regarding how the FBI handled an investigation into the Clinton Foundation.[16] In May 2023, it was revealed that the Justice Department had continued to investigate the Foundation until days before the end of the Trump presidency, when FBI officials insisted the DOJ acknowledge in writing that there was no case to bring.[17]

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
-1 points

Meh. His arguments boil down to “isn’t the government better at spending money?” and “Rich people are bad, they shouldn’t be rich!”. None of his points really have anything to do with these foundations.

The government isn’t “better” at spending money. They have a LOT more of it to spend, though. If the US Government got some tax revenue from, say, inheritance tax when Warren Buffet dies, I don’t see how Congress is going to say “oh nice, a couple more billion dollars to go in our trillions of dollars budget, lets spend it on education”. They’re going to spend it on military or whatever. People lobby congress to spend money and make laws that benefit their company/industry. So that cancels out more than half of his 5 minute video for me.

The beginning of his video talks about how the media portrays it, which is a different subject.

Rich people being rich is an entirely different subject. They are rich, and you can’t go back in time and change that. So that cancels out another minute or two of his video.

He tries to make a point about how they only have to spend 5% of their money every year, like that’s somehow bad? Compare it to a person in retirement: If someone starts with some money in their retirement account with 4% interest (and 3% inflation), if they withdraw 5% of their balance every year, they’ll run out of money. The Gates foundation has a plan to spend a lot more than that after they die. They’re not required to, sure, but why should they be?

All in all, I still fail to see how this strategy is bad for society overall. Argue all you want that there shouldn’t be any individuals with this amount of money, but that’s a different subject.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes that is the goal they State and the propaganda they write.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

There comes a certain point where wealth ceases to be a blessing, and managing it becomes a full time occupation. I can respect this decision.

All the more reason to level the playing field, eh?

permalink
report
reply
20 points

I would respect it more if I wasn’t so jaded, perhaps. But there’s been just too many charity foundations involved in scandals of one type or another.

So, yes, let’s level the playing field! I’m with you there…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He signed the giving pledge with Bill Gates shortly after its creation.

https://givingpledge.org/

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 198K

    Comments