243 points

No shit.

This is literally in the first paragraph of every economics textbook when they talk about tariffs.

permalink
report
reply
143 points

Donald Trump didn’t win the Presidency by reading textbooks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

And you don’t need a textbook to understand how the very basics of business work. You know, the thing people seem convinced he understands? A fucking toddler has more knowledge than Trump. The United States of America doesn’t have two brain cells to rub together

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

They heard lower taxes, and simply misunderstood that tariffs are another form of taxation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
110 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

How do you get by in life without reading? I mean, don’t you have to know what the symbols on clocks mean to tell time?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

He won it by taking bribes from billionaires, like a true politician

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Clearly we need to add those to the banned books list

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

No, the first page is how it introduces inefficiencies into a supply/demand equilibrium, resulting in a lower quantity supplied and at a higher price.

No one who every studies economics, even in passing, would even consider another country paying a tarrif for something you buy. The concept is just… what?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah, the, misguided, idea is that the increase in price from imports will drive domestic production, of those things, as the high prices reduce demand, and cut into profit margins. This used to be something that was a sensible assumption of what would happen. However the contemporary world has far too much infrastructure for tariffs to truly work like that any longer. It will, usually, be cheaper to increase the costs for the tariffs, than to restructure back to domestic production.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It could drive up domestic production, however there us a good reason we import, which is similar to your last point.

Bad example, but its the same reason you “import” Mexican workers - their skills and work ethic, along with willingness to work long hours for low wages. You aren’t going to get hundreds of thousands of Americans to decide to work in a sweat shop, or on farms, or doing handyman work for the same wages.

I was going to mention the low cost of a life in China, and the lax H&S, ethic and environmental regulations, but America is trending that way too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

My friend just got into a fight with some MAGATs on facebook about why we need things like civics education so we know what we’re voting for.

You’ll be shocked to learn the MAGATs called him a communist for daring to want to educate them. They don’t even want to open the textbook let alone read it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
118 points

It’s a certainty, not a fucking "likelihood’. That’s how they work.

permalink
report
reply
65 points

You mean there’s no chance that Wal-Mart might choose to absorb the increased prices out of the goodness of their hearts? :o

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Well, the far-right courts made that illegal for publicly-traded companies, so, no.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I have a trick to get others to pay it for me:

permalink
report
reply
64 points

just like mexico paid for his ‘wall’

permalink
report
reply
3 points

That wall probably bought him a lot of renovations at Mara Lago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’m very glad I live in Canada.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

I’m not sure, USA is way too close for comfort

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Over 51% of men are voting for Poilivre in the next election. That’s across all age groups. We’re where we usually are: 5-10 years behind something the US is doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I hate to say it but the NDP need to replace Singh with someone more charismatic.

There’s too much Trudeau hate for the Liberals to have a chance. Too many people will be voting “anything but liberal” this election because they blame Trudeau.

Right now conservatives feel like the only other option because there’s also enough racists to not to vote for Singh.

We need another NDP leader like Jack Layton that people will see as a symbol of change or we’ll be following in the Americans footsteps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I hate to say it but the NDP need to replace Singh with someone more charismatic.

Right now conservatives feel like the only other option because there’s also enough racists to not to vote for Singh.

Let’s be blunt, the last part is why Singh has to be replaced. This guy got us fucking dental care added to our universal healthcare and people fucking shrugged at it. Rural voters won’t vote him, that’s the ‘issue’ with him in charge.

So the NDP will be forced to pick a white guy to lead and then they can start wrestling away voters from the Lib and Cons. It sucks, but I guess that’s what Canada has decided it is.

EDIT:

Just to be clear, these are who Canadian voters preferred to win the presidency in the US:

Those Con numbers are bleak.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The NDP needs a leader who doesn’t come over as comfortably middle class. It needs to appeal to working class Canadians who are turning to the Conservatives because Trudeau is implausible as a champion of the workers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

The USA screwing up trade never leaves Canada in a good spot. Our prices will go up too. And we’re about to suffer the same effect of mass ignorance after the next federal election when the voters elect a populist bigot with no idea how to run a country. We’re already suffering it in the provincial governments. Plus the bigots in Canada feel empowered to get loud and violent when the Americans are all doing it. I’m glad not to be living in the USA but we’re not looking forward to fun times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’ve heard that y’all have your own far-right, MCGA bullshit to deal with. Do everything you can to stop it. Get involved with as many organizations as you can and get as many people involved as you can. “It’ll never happen here” is complete and utter bullshit. Good luck, Northern brethren.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I live in Alberta. Our premier is basically Marjorie Taylor Greene.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

We’ve already lost that battle sadly. Alberta has Smith (think Marjorie Taylor Greene), the Cons, while refusing to admit climate change is real, and with a leader who spent his entire political career trying to repeal abortion rights/gay rights, have locked away the vote of men with 51%+.

In 2022, 41% of Con voters supported Trump. In 2024, it’s increased to 44% (higher than Biden or Harris in both, though.)

In addition, the Canadian Right-Wing’s favourite Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, heads up a global ‘get Right-Wing governments elected’ organization.

So I wish you the best of luck as well, though I fear we are on similar Germany-in-the-1930’s path).

Help the women and LGBT people in your life, they’re going to need it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Hahaha

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Unless something happens, so far people are voting for PP because of the carbon tax stuff. people don’t want to understand it and want to see the prices at the store cheaper not the refunds at tax time.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 9.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 213K

    Comments